Ronald Reagan: The Greatest President Ever

red states rule · Feb 16, 2012

frodly said: ↑

That is because you have bought into the reagan myth sold by the right-wing and corporate media. Any honest assessment of the long term impacts of his policies makes it clear the disastrous impacts of his policies!! He started us on the path towards enormous debts, he started us on the path towards huge trade deficits, he started us on the path towards economic failure recently, he funded the group that would become al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, and he spent foolishly to counteract a Soviet threat he vastly overestimated, and that was on it's last legs. Reagan's presidency was a disaster, so was Bush's, and so far so is Obama's. I suppose Obama could still improve, but I am about as far from optimistic that will happen as I possibly can be!!
Click to expand...

The greateness of the Reagan economy does drive libs up the wall

snip

HOW DID THE REAGAN TAX CUTS AFFECT THE U.S. TREASURY?

Many critics of reducing taxes claim that the Reagan tax cuts drained the U.S. Treasury. The reality is that federal revenues increased significantly between 1980 and 1990:

Total federal revenues doubled from just over $517 billion in 1980 to more than $1 trillion in 1990. In constant inflation-adjusted dollars, this was a 28 percent increase in revenue.3

As a percentage of the gross domestic product (GDP), federal revenues declined only slightly from 18.9 percent in 1980 to 18 percent in 1990.4

Revenues from individual income taxes climbed from just over $244 billion in 1980 to nearly $467 billion in 1990.5 In inflation-adjusted dollars, this amounts to a 25 percent increase.

HOW DID REAGAN'S POLICIES AFFECT FEDERAL SPENDING?

Although critics continue to focus on President Reagan's budget "cuts," federal spending rose significantly during the 1980s:

Federal spending more than doubled, growing from almost $591 billion in 1980 to $1.25 trillion in 1990. In constant inflation-adjusted dollars, this was an increase of 35.8 percent.6

As a percentage of GDP, federal expenditures grew slightly from 21.6 percent in 1980 to 21.8 percent in 1990.7

Contrary to popular myth, while inflation-adjusted defense spending increased by 50 percent between 1980 and 1989, it was curtailed when the Cold War ended and fell by 15 percent between 1989 and 1993. However, means-tested entitlements, which do not include Social Security or Medicare, rose by over 102 percent between 1980 and 1993, and they have continued climbing ever since.8

Total spending on all national security programs never equaled domestic spending, even when Social Security, Medicare, and net interest are excluded from domestic totals. In addition, national security spending fell during the Administration of the senior President Bush, while domestic spending increased in both mandatory and discretionary accounts

HOW DID REAGAN'S POLICIES AFFECT ECONOMIC GROWTH?

Despite the steep recession in 1982--brought on by tight money policies that were instituted to squeeze out the historic inflation level of the late 1970s--by 1983, the Reagan policies of reducing taxes, spending, regulation, and inflation were in place. The result was unprecedented economic growth:

This economic boom lasted 92 months without a recession, from November 1982 to July 1990, the longest period of sustained growth during peacetime and the second-longest period of sustained growth in U.S. history. The growth in the economy lasted more than twice as long as the average period of expansions since World War II.10

The American economy grew by about one-third in real inflation-adjusted terms. This was the equivalent of adding the entire economy of East and West Germany or two-thirds of Japan's economy to the U.S. economy.11

From 1950 to 1973, real economic growth in the U.S. economy averaged 3.6 percent per year. From 1973 to 1982, it averaged only 1.6 percent. The Reagan economic boom restored the more usual growth rate as the economy averaged 3.5 percent in real growth from the beginning of 1983 to the end of 1990.12

HOW DID REAGAN'S POLICIES AFFECT THE FEDERAL TAX BURDEN?

Perhaps the greatest myth concerning the 1980s is that Ronald Reagan slashed taxes so dramatically for the rich that they no longer have paid their fair share. The flaw in this myth is that it mixes tax rates with taxes actually paid and ignores the real trend of taxation:

In 1991, after the Reagan rate cuts were well in place, the top 1 percent of taxpayers in income paid 25 percent of all income taxes; the top 5 percent paid 43 percent; and the bottom 50 percent paid only 5 percent.13 To suggest that this distribution is unfair because it is too easy on upper-income groups is nothing less than absurd.

The proportion of total income taxes paid by the top 1 percent rose sharply under President Reagan, from 18 percent in 1981 to 28 percent in 1988.14

Average effective income tax rates were cut even more for lower-income groups than for higher-income groups. While the average effective tax rate for the top 1 percent fell by 30 percent between 1980 and 1992, and by 35 percent for the top 20 percent of income earners, it fell by 44 percent for the second-highest quintile, 46 percent for the middle quintile, 64 percent for the second-lowest quintile, and 263 percent for the bottom quintile.15

These reductions for the lowest-income groups were so large because President Reagan doubled the personal exemption, increased the standard deduction, and tripled the earned income tax credit (EITC), which provides net cash for single-parent families with children at the lowest income levels. These changes eliminated income tax liability altogether for over 4 million lower-income families.16

Critics often add in the Social Security payroll tax and argue that the total federal tax burden shifted more to lower-income groups and away from upper-income groups; but President Reagan's changes were in the income tax, not in the Social Security payroll tax. The payroll tax was imposed by proponents of big government over the past 50 years, and it is they, not Ronald Reagan, who should be held accountable for its distributional effects.

Nevertheless, even if one counts the Social Security payroll tax, the share of total federal taxes increased between 1980 and 1989 for the following groups:

For the top 1 percent of taxpayers, from 12.9 percent in 1980 to 15.4 percent in 1989;

For the top 5 percent of taxpayers, from 27.3 percent in 1980 to 30.4 percent in 1989; and

For the top 20 percent of taxpayers, from 56.1 percent in 1980 to 58.6 percent in 1989.
On the other hand, the share of total federal taxes, if one includes the Social Security payroll tax, declined for four groups:

For the second-highest 20 percent of taxpayers, from 22.2 percent in 1980 to 20.8 percent in 1989;

For the middle 20 percent of taxpayers, from 13.2 percent in 1980 to 12.5 percent in 1989;

For the second-lowest 20 percent of taxpayers, from 6.9 percent in 1980 to 6.4 percent in 1989; and

For the lowest 20 percent of taxpayers, from 1.6 percent in 1980 to 1.5 percent in 1989.17

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2001/03/the-real-reagan-economic-record
Click to expand...

MegadethFan · Feb 16, 2012

red states rule said: ↑

The greateness of the Reagan economy does drive libs up the wall
Click to expand...

Your link shows how bad his economics were actually. He violated the free market with more protectionism than any other president since ww2, he increased the size of government in spending, taxes and employment by the end of his second term. And that's his economics. People here seem to have forgotten his ardent support terrorists in multiple countries entirely screwed over countries like Nicaragua.

frodly · Feb 16, 2012

red states rule said: ↑

The greateness of the Reagan economy does drive libs up the wall
Click to expand...

Well that piece of propaganda is truly trash!! First of all, SS is funded by it's own tax, and consistently ran a surplus throughout the 80s. To blame that for the deficit, and not Reagan's disastrous defense spending is proof of either a liar or an idiot. So the author of your article is one of those 2 things.

Next up, right wingers who believe in the Reagan myth, love to reference the expansion that took place in about 2-3 years in the middle of his term, ignoring the fact that it was bookended by 2 major recessions. Also ignoring the fact, that the mid 80s expansion was almost entirely down to Paul Volker's decisions as federal reserve chairman. However, by the time Reagan's long term policies have been felt, it becomes quite clear how truly disastrous they are!!

Iriemon · Feb 16, 2012

red states rule said: ↑

The greateness of the Reagan economy does drive libs up the wall
Click to expand...

Reagan's tax cut effects were mitigated by the several tax increases he imposed.

But even so, as your article points out, revenues dropped about a percentage point relative to GDP. That, combined with massive spending increases (mostly military) was enough to triple deficits and quadruple the debt by 1992.

But the Heritage article doesn't mention that, does it?

What a shocker.

Mushroom · Feb 16, 2012

Mr_Truth said: ↑

The World Trade Center was still standing
Click to expand...

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=wtc+bombing+1993

Mr_Truth said: ↑

Reaganvilles
Click to expand...

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=reaganville&l=1

Mr_Truth · Feb 16, 2012

He also failed to mention the deregulation of the banking system, the lending market, and the housing market under Clinton
Click to expand...

Can you list the names of the Congressional politicians who created those laws and what political party they belonged to?

red states rule · Feb 17, 2012

frodly said: ↑

Well that piece of propaganda is truly trash!! First of all, SS is funded by it's own tax, and consistently ran a surplus throughout the 80s. To blame that for the deficit, and not Reagan's disastrous defense spending is proof of either a liar or an idiot. So the author of your article is one of those 2 things.

Next up, right wingers who believe in the Reagan myth, love to reference the expansion that took place in about 2-3 years in the middle of his term, ignoring the fact that it was bookended by 2 major recessions. Also ignoring the fact, that the mid 80s expansion was almost entirely down to Paul Volker's decisions as federal reserve chairman. However, by the time Reagan's long term policies have been felt, it becomes quite clear how truly disastrous they are!!
Click to expand...

Yea the NERVE of the auther to use data from

U.S. Office of Management and Budget, Budget

Joint Economic Committee, The Great Expansion: How It Was Achieved and How It Can Be Sustained, U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate, 106th Cong., 2nd Sess., April 2000, pp. 4-6.

the IRS

What would these government agencies know about the success of Reagan's economic policies?

Farnsworth · Feb 17, 2012

Mr_Truth said: ↑

Can you list the names of the Congressional politicians who created those laws and what political party they belonged to?
Click to expand...

Indeed, and of course they won't, they will change the subject and ignore real facts.

Mushroom · Feb 17, 2012

Mr_Truth said: ↑

Can you list the names of the Congressional politicians who created those laws and what political party they belonged to?
Click to expand...

Is it really so hard to do your own research? You insist on others doing it for you? Of course, it was actually rather hard to find out who the actual co-sponsors of this bill was. Almost every bit of information I could find only listed their last names.

Most of this is generally placed on the Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994, otherwise known as the Riegle-Neal Act. This is the act that started the rapid slide away from regulations that had prevented banks from operating across state lines, and also in participating in other areas of the financial market.

Before this act, if a bank had branches across state lines, they had to be either seperate banks working together (like First Interstate Bankwas a conglomerate of many individual banks), or a single company with different state organizations (like Security Pacific of California and Security Pacific of Idaho). And each independent office had to follow the laws of the state it operated in.

This prevented most banks from expanding more then a single state. And each seperate part had to follow the banking laws of the state it was in. With this law, a bank could spread across multiple states, and only had to follow the laws of it's home state.

This law allowed financial institutions to spread like crazy, often overextending themselves. And also many would re-incorporate in states with more lax regulations, and then were free to expand into other states without having to comply with their regulations.

It also started a slew of mergers between strong and weak banks, some friendly but many hostile.

And the sponsors of this bill? Senator Donald W Riegle Jr, Democrat from Michigan, and Congressman Stephen L. Neal, Democrat from North Carolina.

In fact, I absolutely love the article found here:

http://thinkprogress.org/yglesias/2...s-steagall-is-mostly-a-red-herring/?mobile=nc

And notice the picture of Senator Riegle. Think Progress has him listed as a Republican. Nice, except he switched to Democrat when he was still a Congressman in 1973. In his political career, he spent 6 years as a Republican, and his last 19 as a Democrat. Nice piece of highly inaccurate spin there.

Mr_Truth · Feb 17, 2012

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GrammLeachBliley_Act

Gramm, Leach, Bliley were Republicans.

MegadethFan · Feb 17, 2012

Why would you like Reagan when he condoned the most vile massacring of innocent people? Modern beheading terrorists have nothing on the brutality the guys, who he supportered, dished out.

frodly · Feb 17, 2012

Farnsworth said: ↑

Indeed, and of course they won't, they will change the subject and ignore real facts.
Click to expand...

Why exactly would you assume such a silly thing? Graham, Leach, Bliley was approved by 84% of Senate Democrats and 75% of House Democrats. That is is lower than the percentages of Republicans that supported it, but not by that much.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GrammLeachBliley_Act

People on the left in America, who still support the Democrats need to reevaluate their priorities. There were other bills that deregulated the system as well, and they all had significant Democtatic support and were signed by a Democratic president. Stop deluding yourselves into believing democrats in any way represent a left-wing agenda, because they don't!! They are coporatists just like Republicans!!

red states rule · Feb 18, 2012

If only Obama would follow in Reagan's footsteps

snip

During Reagans 8 years in office, the United States had the largest peacetime economic expansion in history along with creating approximately 35 million new jobs. President Reagan helped the U.S. achieve this economic boom through implementing sweeping economic reforms that contrary to the Keynesian economic policies of the liberals in Congress at the time (and Obama today). Reagan stated, Governments view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it. His solution to our economic malaise would be to correct those three governmental behaviors. Reagans approach would include implementing across-the-board tax cuts, simplified government regulations, and sound monetary policies.

Reagans trademark tax policy was based upon the Laffer Curve. This concept made popular by Professor Laffer explained why high tax policies never maximize revenue to the federal government. Liberal tax policies assume in order to raise revenue all the government needs to do is to increase tax rates. Of course they assume that individuals wouldnt adjust their behavior in response to the tax increase. This failed assumption ultimately causes their tax increase to fail to create more revenue for the government and acts as an anchor around the waist of the economy. The concept of the Laffer Curve acknowledges that individuals will alter their behavior in response to tax policy. Laffer identifies an ideal marginal tax rate that maximizes revenue and economic growth. As the rate goes higher, the economy doesnt grow as fast and individuals choose not to work harder because too much of their additional income is taken in taxes. As the tax rate goes materially lower, the marginal revenue to the government is decreased because the additional stimulus to the economy of the tax cut is less than the percentage decrease in taxes.

Reagan found that equilibrium of the Laffer Curve existed at about the 28% marginal tax rate. Thus as part of the turnaround, President Reagan would reduce the maximum marginal tax rate for individuals and corporations to 28%. Reagan would also simplify the tax code again by eliminating many of the tax loopholes and exemptions. At the same time, he would help the lower-income families by increasing the personal exemption, the standard deduction, and the earned income tax credit (EITC). Although the liberals always whine every time taxes our cut, these approaches when previously implemented by Reagan doubled federal tax revenues from $517 billion in 1980 to more than $1 trillion in 1990.

In the area of deregulation, Reagan would primarily unwind many of the regulations created by Congress since he left office. Reagan believed in keeping federal regulations simple and enforceable. Reagan also believed in shifting most regulations to the States. This new Federalism would have the Federal government impact policies through block grants of funds to the states which allowed each state to decide how to implement their own programs. This approach would be a more effective way to address healthcare (including Medicare and Medicaid), illegal immigration, and environmental health and safety issues. During Reagans two terms his administration cut the Federal Register of regulations to almost half the size it was when he was inaugurated. Since the Federal Register has swollen beyond the size that it was when Reagan entered office in 1980, clearly his objective would be to reduce the complexity in those regulations by at least half. With simplified regulations, the government could more effectively actually enforce these policies and avoid disasters like the Dodd/Frank Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac meltdown in 2008.

In the area of monetary policy, Reagan would also make major changes which would require replacing the current Chairman of the Federal Reserve. Reagan would support the reduction of the current authority of the Federal Reserve including implementing an annual audit of the FED. We would see a return to the taxpayers of the unused TARP funds and a stop of the Quantitative Easing programs by the FED. In addition, Reagan would encourage the FED to slow the growth of the money supply to head off the tsunami of inflation that is building under Obamas policies. Of course some of these monetary moves will cause a short-term economic adjustment and downturn while the economy settles to a normal pricing equilibrium free of the manipulation by the federal government. However the increase in the stability of the U.S. Dollar and heading off of major inflation problems will lead to a huge influx of investment and capital into the United States which will more than offset the short-term economic adjustment.

Although Reagan had his detractors at the time and we would have them again today, President Reagans policies created growth that lasted for 92 months without a recession. During this period of unprecedented growth, Reagan dramatically decreased unemployment, reduced interest rates and reduced inflation. The foundation of all of Reagans economic policies was his belief in the power of the individual. It is the individual, not the government, who creates all jobs, all growth, and all value in our economy. As Reagan said, There are no constraints on the human mind, no walls around the human spirit, no barriers to our progress except those we ourselves erect. Wouldnt it be great to again have a President who has more faith in us than he has in the government bureaucracy?

http://trentderr.com/2011/03/15/3-economic-policies-reagan-had-right-and-obama-never-learned/
Click to expand...

MegadethFan · Feb 18, 2012

red states rule said: ↑

If only Obama would follow in Reagan's footsteps
Click to expand...

But then... which terrorists should he arm?

onalandline · Feb 18, 2012

MegadethFan said: ↑

But then... which terrorists should he arm?
Click to expand...

Well, he did arm the Mexican drug cartels through Fast & Furious.

frodly · Feb 18, 2012

red states rule said: ↑

If only Obama would follow in Reagan's footsteps
Click to expand...

Again, absolute trash you are posting!! Where you do you find this stuff? I love how you keep repeating this same meme over and over again, but never point out what it means. Nor how Reagan is responsible. Here is some actual economic analysis. I know you prefer to read right-wing propaganda, but humor me!!

As for the claim that Reagan's 1981 tax cuts were responsible for "the greatest peacetime expansion in U.S. history," a few grains of salt are in order here. The timeline better fits the liberal explanation than the conservative one. Volcker expanded the money supply in late 1982, and a few months later the economy took off. However, Reagan's tax cuts were passed in 1981, and were already in effect by 1982 -- but, as we have seen, 1982 was the year of the horrific recession.

Tax cuts were supposed to have spurred economic recovery by liberating the tax dollars of entrepreneurs and allowing them to invest them in greater productivity and jobs. However, such greater investment never occurred. It appears that the rich simply pocketed the savings, because investment fell during the 80s:

Private investment (4)

1970 - 1979 18.6%
1980 - 1992 17.4
So there is no evidence that the conservative revisionism is true.
Click to expand...

Flyflicker · Feb 18, 2012

onalandline said: ↑

Well, he did arm the Mexican drug cartels through Fast & Furious.
Click to expand...

Yet another parallel between the two presidents. They're looking more and more alike all the time.

frodly · Feb 18, 2012

Flyflicker said: ↑

Yet another parallel between the two presidents. They're looking more and more alike all the time.
Click to expand...

In their failure? I agree!! Obama is not yet on par with the massive failure that was Reagan's presidency, but he can certainly get their if he keeps up his current pace!!

PatriotNews · Feb 18, 2012

frodly said: ↑

Again, absolute trash you are posting!! Where you do you find this stuff? I love how you keep repeating this same meme over and over again, but never point out what it means. Nor how Reagan is responsible. Here is some actual economic analysis. I know you prefer to read right-wing propaganda, but humor me!!

Private investment (4)

1970 - 1979 18.6%
1980 - 1992 17.4
So there is no evidence that the conservative revisionism is true.
Click to expand...

Click to expand...

Wow, what an amazing statistic. I'm not sure what it would mean even if it were true. I don't know where you got it from, as it is posted in blogs all over the internet, but none of them credit a source for the stat either. I don't know why you post "actual economic analysis" without telling us who is doing the analysis. Perhaps this is evidence that liberal revisionism is alive and well.

MegadethFan · Feb 18, 2012

PatriotNews said: ↑

Wow, what an amazing statistic. I'm not sure what it would mean even if it were true. I don't know where you got it from, as it is posted in blogs all over the internet, but none of them credit a source for the stat either. I don't know why you post "actual economic analysis" without telling us who is doing the analysis. Perhaps this is evidence that liberal revisionism is alive and well.
Click to expand...

Do you know Reagan supported the massacring, raping, theft and pillage of thousands of innocent people?

frodly · Feb 18, 2012

PatriotNews said: ↑

Wow, what an amazing statistic. I'm not sure what it would mean even if it were true. I don't know where you got it from, as it is posted in blogs all over the internet, but none of them credit a source for the stat either. I don't know why you post "actual economic analysis" without telling us who is doing the analysis. Perhaps this is evidence that liberal revisionism is alive and well.
Click to expand...

Yes, that is my fault, and I apologize!! I meant to post the link, and somehow I forgot. Here you go.

http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-carterreagan.htm

PatriotNews · Feb 18, 2012

MegadethFan said: ↑

Do you know Reagan supported the massacring, raping, theft and pillage of thousands of innocent people?
Click to expand...

Really? I didn't see that in any of his speeches or writings. Where did you find the evidence that he supported this? I saw you earlier posts and was tempted to respond to them, but why? Reagan's support of freedom fighters throughout the world does not mean he is responsible for or condoned the acts of rogue elements or perpetrators of atrocities associated with democratic revolutionary movements. There is quite some difference between endorsing of democratic freedom movements and terrorist organizations which seek to impose their own form of despotic totalitarianism.

Mr_Truth · Feb 18, 2012

"If only O'Bama would follow Reagan's footsteps ... During Reagans 8 years in office, the United States had the largest peacetime economic expansion in history along with creating approximately 35 million new jobs. President Reagan helped the U.S. achieve this economic boom through implementing sweeping economic reforms that contrary to the Keynesian economic policies of the liberals in Congress at the time (and Obama today). Reagan stated, Governments view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it. His solution to our economic malaise would be to correct those three governmental behaviors. Reagans approach would include implementing across-the-board tax cuts, simplified government regulations, and sound monetary policies.''

Reagan was a Keynesian in that he increased the Federal deficit. Further, he did not come close to creating 35 million jobs:

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Which_president_of_the_us_created_the_most_jobs

"From 1980 to the end of the Bush 43 administration, all three Republican presidents combined produced, over a period of 20 years, two million fewer jobs than Bill Clinton managed to eke out in eight. Kennedy and Johnson managed to produce 50 percent more jobs in four years than the Bushes did in twelve."

--------------

Want more jobs? Vote Democrat and bring back FDR banking regulation.

MegadethFan · Feb 18, 2012

PatriotNews said: ↑

Really? I didn't see that in any of his speeches or writings.
Click to expand...

Yes, that's also quite interesting. Reagan wanted to openly praise their brutality but he was advised not to by his aids, like George Schultz, especially as Reagan began to work behind Congress's back, ie illegally, to continue the horrific policy.

PatriotNews said: ↑

Where did you find the evidence that he supported this?
Click to expand...

The historical record. Would you like some examples?

PatriotNews said: ↑

I saw you earlier posts and was tempted to respond to them, but why? Reagan's support of freedom fighters throughout the world does not mean he is responsible for or condoned the acts of rogue elements or perpetrators of atrocities associated with democratic revolutionary movements.
Click to expand...

Yes it is. In fact Washington often directed these attacks and purposely towards what were called "soft targets" that is civilians. The ICC also found the US guilty of starting an illegal war, but people swept up in the Reagan mythology forget about this evil.

PatriotNews said: ↑

There is quite some difference between endorsing of democratic freedom movements and terrorist organizations which seek to impose their own form of despotic totalitarianism.
Click to expand...

Reagan supported terrorist organizations which seek to impose their own form of despotic totalitarianism. Examples: Nicaragua, Guatemala, Chile, Afghanistan, South Africa, list goes on.

red states rule · Feb 20, 2012

PatriotNews said: ↑

Wow, what an amazing statistic. I'm not sure what it would mean even if it were true. I don't know where you got it from, as it is posted in blogs all over the internet, but none of them credit a source for the stat either. I don't know why you post "actual economic analysis" without telling us who is doing the analysis. Perhaps this is evidence that liberal revisionism is alive and well.
Click to expand...

It s from Paul Krugman - enough said

Log in or Sign up

Ronald Reagan: The Greatest President Ever

Who was the Greatest American President?

Ronald Reagan

Barrack Hussien Obama

Abraham Lincoln

FDR

Thomas Jefferson

William Jefferson Clinton

George Washington

James Earl Carter

George W. Bush

John Fitzgerald Kennedy

red states rule New Member Past Donor

MegadethFan Well-Known Member

frodly Well-Known Member

Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

Mushroom Well-Known Member

Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

red states rule New Member Past Donor

Farnsworth Well-Known Member

Mushroom Well-Known Member

Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

MegadethFan Well-Known Member

frodly Well-Known Member

red states rule New Member Past Donor

MegadethFan Well-Known Member

onalandline Well-Known Member Past Donor

frodly Well-Known Member

Flyflicker New Member

frodly Well-Known Member

PatriotNews Well-Known Member

MegadethFan Well-Known Member

frodly Well-Known Member

PatriotNews Well-Known Member

Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

MegadethFan Well-Known Member

red states rule New Member Past Donor

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

Ronald Reagan: The Greatest President Ever

Who was the Greatest American President?

Ronald Reagan

Barrack Hussien Obama

Abraham Lincoln

FDR

Thomas Jefferson

William Jefferson Clinton

George Washington

James Earl Carter

George W. Bush

John Fitzgerald Kennedy

red states rule New Member Past Donor

MegadethFan Well-Known Member

frodly Well-Known Member

Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

Mushroom Well-Known Member

Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

red states rule New Member Past Donor

Farnsworth Well-Known Member

Mushroom Well-Known Member

Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

MegadethFan Well-Known Member

frodly Well-Known Member

red states rule New Member Past Donor

MegadethFan Well-Known Member

onalandline Well-Known Member Past Donor

frodly Well-Known Member

Flyflicker New Member

frodly Well-Known Member

PatriotNews Well-Known Member

MegadethFan Well-Known Member

frodly Well-Known Member

PatriotNews Well-Known Member

Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

MegadethFan Well-Known Member

red states rule New Member Past Donor

Share This Page

Useful Searches