The aggressive promotion of homosexuality;

To save drama and hysterics, let me say from the get go, that I wish no harm upon homsexuals, nor would I ever defend any physical attacks on them, nor would I criminalise the actions.

However, with all of that said, it is clear as a bell that there is a malevolent agenda to over promote homsexuality, in media, in films, in music, in politics, not to mention the sheer volume of different gay lobbying groups, of which there seem to be so many. This is all way out of proportion to the approx 3% of society that are homosexual, moreover, it is one thing to say what I did in my first two sentences, and leave it at that, but I really do not see how homosexuality is deserving of this level of promotion, as if by being so, they are somehow enlightened.

It isn't. Some offerings;

Now, Heterosexuals are in the Closet

If you search "heterosexual" in Google, you will get 16 million citations. Search "homosexual" and you get more than 20 million citations, pretty good for 3% of the population. ("Lesbian" got 10 million.)

Per capita "homosexual" received 100 times the citations "heterosexual" got. "Homosexuality" (10.7 million citations) got roughly 11 times the citations of "heterosexuality" (990,000.) Per capita, homosexuality got 3500 times more citations than "heterosexuality."

The fact that the word "heterosexuality" is in rare use is a shocking illustration of the cultural vacuum the non-gay majority inhabits. Our majority "default" status doesn't explain it. In terms of cultural support, non-gays are being starved or as I will suggest later, poisoned.

Another example. There are 21 times as many used books listed with the Advanced Booksellers Exchange under the keyword "homosexuality" as "heterosexuality" (24233 to 1154). Per cap this means there are 6750 references to homosexuality for every one to heterosexuality .

http://www.savethemales.ca/000652.html

 

A good chunk of those hits are coming because "Homosexuality" has been in the news lately, mostly from gays demanding new rights they didn't have before, and this, along with the responses to it, are driving the hits. There's not a lot of straights demanding new rights for themselves in comparison.

I suspect a lot of the hits for "lesbian" are for differing reasons btw!

 

I should have also commented on this part:

It's being promoted by liberals and the liberal media under the banner of tolerance for all - as long as it's an idea they agree with. It's a given that we're in a culture war atm, with the liberal news media taking it upon itself to decide what should and shouldn't be news. accordingly, since many conservatives are against gay marriage - voila, liberals are for it.

 

Shoot me for this, but I do not think gays should be 'free' to marry, in the interests of this BS 'equality', any more than you should have a campaign for Muslims to have the right to celebrate Passover.

**

Dr. Charles Socarides' book "Homosexuality: A Freedom Too Far" .

I urge you to read Dr. Charles Socarides' book "Homosexuality: A Freedom Too Far" to understand the true nature of homosexuality and the insidious campaign to mainstream it. As a psychiatrist, he treated homosexuals for 40 years.

In today's context, "tolerance" etc. really means non-gays must embrace homosexual behavior. This is also seen in their attempt to force schools to adopt "gay friendly" values.

Resistors are typically accused of "hatred" and "intolerance." There is a clear distinction between accepting differences without rancor and not wanting to adopt those differences yourself or to see society subverted.

The continuing assault on heterosexuals is seen in the demand for same sex marriage which is really about redefining and destroying marriage. Few gays want to marry.

http://www.savethemales.ca/few_gays_opt_to_marry.html

 

They already do. Heck, I have the right to celebrate Ramadan if I wish to.

 

Apples and Oranges. Marriage is a civil and legal conjoining. Passover is a religious observance.

And the reason that the word comes up so often is you folks who are bigoted against them keep whining about them on the interweb.

 

Yes, but why would you WANT to, and why would you expect to see that hammered along, ALL the time, in the media?

- - - Updated - - -

Don't play that card.

Doesn't cut any ice.

No drama, no hysteria, like I said.

 

There is no other possible explanation for the question of "Why do you care?"

SSM will not materially affect your life in any way, assuming you're not forced against your will to enter into one. You lack standing to object.

 

I don't want to, I merely said I have the RIGHT to.

As far as it being hammered along all the time in the media, you've already said you've turned the telly off over there in Airstrip One, so why would that even be an issue for you?

 

I like the reference to Airstrip One...

Now, what's wrong with lobby groups wanting to "normalise" (and I use that word to indicate a process, not the current status of anyone's sexuality) homosexuality? After all, the societal perspective on homosexuality, as with anything else, is socially constructed and is therefore amenable to alteration.

 

Society. I think beyond just me.

See, here is a 'spokesperson' for the 'soooooooooooo tolerant' and so called gay movement.

Only a blind man can see how dangerous it is to let such people have anyone's ear, right?

And the fact that the 'movement' did not just bin him, what message does that send to you?

Peter Gary Tatchell (born 25 January 1952) is an Australian-born British political campaigner best known for his work with LGBT social movements (lesbian, gay, bi-sexual and transgender).

In the 1990s he campaigned for LGBT rights through the direct action group OutRage!, which he co-founded. He has worked on various campaigns, such as Stop Murder Music against music lyrics inciting violence against LGBT people and writes and broadcasts on various human rights and social justice issues. In 2006, New Statesman readers voted him sixth on their list of "Heroes of our time".

In 1996 Tatchell led an OutRage! campaign to reduce the age of consent to 14

In a 1997 letter to The Guardian, Tatchell defended an academic book about 'boy-love', calling the work "courageous" before writing:

The positive nature of some child-adult sexual relationships is not confined to non-Western cultures. Several of my friends – gay and straight, male and female – had sex with adults from the ages of nine to 13. None feel they were abused. All say it was their conscious choice and gave them great joy. While it may be impossible to condone paedophilia, it is time society acknowledged the truth that not all sex involving children is unwanted, abusive and harmful

What.

A.

Freak.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Tatchell

 

It was not that long ago that people in this country routinely got married at 12, 13, or 14 years old. In nature, when animals achieve sexual maturity, they start having sex and making babies. We have decided that's inappropriate behavior for humans, but that choice is arbitrary.

 

A crackpot website features a crackpot article. What else is new?

One might as well get in a tizzy over "the aggressive promotion of left-handedness." Are folks who are drawn to this sort of nonsense fearful that they might change their sexuality?

Meanwhile, back in the normal world, heterosexuals and homosexuals that increasingly enjoy equal rights get along just fine. and the progress is not about to be arrested by those who want to see discrimination legislated.

 

Started in the early 1980's with the recognition of AIDS. The gays were dropping like flies and they needed access to expensive medication. With a corporate facist president in charge of the USA currently, it is only logical to rev the engine full throttle so that those costs (and other previously undefined privileges) are deferred to someone else for their vote.

 

Is this really about the UK headed close to legalizing gay marriage, though?

And I bet you could find ten more. So, are they to be the collective representatives of the gay movement then? Find the worst of the lot and parade them about as the norm?

 

It's great to see we've come so far since interracial marriages were banned.

Oh wait...

 

As long as your check book is paying for said civil liberties, I'm all in. If you want to include me, *&*!@#!!!!, you

 

Sure. As soon as you stop using government land, roads, schools, water, electricity, broadcasting, police, fire fighters, ambulances, emergency services, defence, technology, materials bought specifically through trade agreements, laws that allow you to make money in the first place, etc. etc. etc. etc. et-(*)(*)(*)(*)in'-cetra.

Those getting married are paying for their marriage, not you. You're demanding people not have a right to same-sex or interracial marriage despite the fact it relates in no way to you.

 

It could be much higher considering a lot of homosexuals wouldn't want to admit it when asked. The closet dwellers.

Or maybe straight guys promote homosexuality in order to reduce the competition for pulling the ladies?

 

Go on then, rot all the building blocks of your society, give it ten years, and it will be some group lobbying for 'the right for a child to have sex with old men.'.

Hurrah. Go progress.

 

Jack Napier... are you a Muslim?
Are your parents?

 

Why, do you want a date?

 

You actually noticed?

 

Yes. Of course. It is being FORCED everywhere.

 

It is nothing to be ashamed of. I was asking you a personal question. You are not obliged to answer it. I just thought you believed in transparency and truth and whatnot.

You are free to ask the same of me.