37 FACTS that contradict the "official" BS story

After all this time we can only assume the contradictions are intentional. RWF thinks he's trying to trick us.

I'd say it's a strange tactic for someone professing the desire to uncover truth.

Why does telling the truth require that you tell so many lies, RWF?

 

I don't support disinformation.

 

I've seen all the proof I need to establish that the 'offcial' BS story is flawed, inaccurate, incomplete, and simply isn't the truth.

 

And you've been asked to provide it,and have been lacking.

 

Round and round goes the merry go round.

- - - Updated - - -

There were videos that were confscated though, and this isn't 1912.

 

I could never trick you guys...you're sooo much smarter than I am...how silly a suggestion.

 

I would not include Alex Jones as an engineering expert.

 

Idiots link to 'no planes' sites.

 

You won't find the truth on your 'no planes' site, fraud.

 

You are right in that not many Pentagon Videos are available for viewing as because it is after all the PENTAGON....they do not want to release every single video angle of that plane impacting the building as to do so would compromise security.

But multiple videos have been released of that commercial aircraft hitting the Pentagon and because of what I do...I have been allowed to view many camera angles that have not nor ever be released to the public.

RT WING....I know you don't know me but if you ever have the time check out some of the posts I have made upon this forum.

I think if you read some of them you will find I am NOT a person to take sides on an issue other than whatever side is the PROVEN FACTUAL SIDE!!!!

I am interested in only FACTS....and unless it is something I cannot talk about I will NEVER state something that is not true and if I make a mistake and someone here can provide a link to a VIABLE source to prove me wrong....I WELCOME ANYONE HERE DOING THIS FOR ME....as I would rather be proven wrong then be allowed to keep thinking and posting something that is not a fact.

And if I am proven wrong I will THANK the person who has done this for me and apologize to the membership for posting incorrect data or information.

Now...again...I know you don't know me but if there is ANYONE HERE on this forum that you can believe is posting about something that is a fact and is not a person that would EVER purposely post false information or data or have an ego driven issue that precludes them from admitting a mistake.....that ANYONE HERE...would be me.

Take my word for it.....and if not my word....I will give you links to unbiased sources that are worthy of you reading the data.

AboveAlpha

 

I can say this with CERTAINTY.

If 9/11 had been an inside job.....and this was back in 2001 and because of what I was doing in 2000 and 2001 and what my...JOB was at the time....I WOULD HAVE KNOWN ABOUT IT!!!

9/11 WAS NOT AN INSIDE JOB and for those of us....and there are not all that many of us looking at the percentages....those of us who are responsible for certain things and those things at that time in 2000 and 2001...we would absolutely been in the loop and I can tell you we would HAVE MADE CERTAIN ANY ASS#@!$# who might have even SUGGESTED doing or planning such a thing would have NEVER been heard or seen again!

To suggest 9/11 was an inside job is just plain stupidity.

AboveAlpha

 

Actually, no. The size shown is arbitrary. None of the authors in that article have any credentials to assess such evidence.

[QUOTR]The nose of the craft that hit the Pentagon was too pointed to be the nose of a 757.
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/blog/wp-content/images/pentagon1_plane.jpg[/QUOTE]They have mistaken the smoke frail for the aircraft.

There are witnesses that put the 757 flying at an angle that's inconsistent with the angle of the craft that crashed...
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/2170

...supporting the theory that a 757 flew over the Pentagon and landed at the airport behind it and a smaller craft came in at a different angle.

They have totally failed to measure the impact damage or identify the points of impact.

Speculative and without supporting evidence.

Dealt with elsewhere.

They are expert liars. Pod people are nuts or lying.

 

They have mistaken the smoke frail for the aircraft.

There are witnesses that put the 757 flying at an angle that's inconsistent with the angle of the craft that crashed...
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/2170

...supporting the theory that a 757 flew over the Pentagon and landed at the airport behind it and a smaller craft came in at a different angle.

They have totally failed to measure the impact damage or identify the points of impact.

Speculative and without supporting evidence.

Dealt with elsewhere.

They are expert liars. Pod people are nuts or lying.[/QUOTE]

The people who keep posting or creating conspiracy theory sites or blogs fail to talk about the recovery of the BODIES all over and around the Pentagon.

These IDIOTS will not even acknowledge all the forensic people and coroners and the pictures taken of EACH AND EVERY SINGLE BODY OR BODY PART recovered at the Pentagon Crash Site.

AboveAlpha

 

Present your sources, AA. I'll be happy to test them, and challenge them if need be.

As to the confiscated videos, why can't they release ONE that verifies their 'story'? Maybe, just maybe, it's because none exist, because the event didn't occur as they would have us all believe? Perhaps it shows something other than what they pretend happened? Bottom line is that they don't want the scrutiny, after that ridiculous attempt at the one BS clip they tried desperately to pass off as Flight 77.

 

Truthers - If it's not on video, it never happened. No planers are not smart. Ignoring witnesses, radar, debris and more.

 

Indeed.

They whine about no videos from the Pentagon, yet squeal that the MULTIPLE videos from the WTC were faked. Pathetic.

 

and these truthers are happy to call WTC no-planers "crazy" or "disinfo" yet see no hypocrisy in saying no plane hit the Pentagon or Shanksville. In truth there's more evidence that planes hit the Pentagon and Shanksville than there is that planes hit the WTC.

 

OCTers...if you don't believe everything they say, without questioning any of it, you must be crazy. Ignoring common sense, other pilot's assessments, the immediate confiscation of every piece of video they could get their hands on, and then, take their word for it that "nothing" was found...oye vay...

 

Shanksville is an even bigger joke. I still can't figure out if we're supposed to believe the plane buried itself 40 feet underground, of evaporated on impact. Either way, there is no evidence 93 hit. Looks more like a hole made by an on board missile from nearby (witnessed) military aircraft to me.

 

The videos have all been released. You can view them for yourself.

No planers are indeed mentally unstable.

- - - Updated - - -

Except for the eyewitness, RADAR evidence, forensic and DNA evidence.

 

Not all of them, boss.


Maybe the witnesses, radar evidence, were all part of the "simulation"? Something from the script maybe?

 

Yes child, All of them.

 

Sorry Fraud, but just because you say there's "no evidence", doesn't mean there is none. Anyone looking at this thread only has to google to see you are wrong. You truthers are your own worst enemy really. Your insane claims are one quick google search away for anyone. And that, Fraud, is why there is no "truth movement" anymore. You can thank your insane claims + google for that one.

 

Bodies and body parts can be planted before and after a crash so that's not conclusive proof of anything. There were people working in the Pentagon on the day of the crash so there being bodies and body parts isn't unusual.

In this video a plausible explanation for the bodies and DNA is put forth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5wkyEDIxTk
"9/11 - Painful Deceptions - (Full Length)."
(44:00 time mark)

You seem to be trying to sweep this under the rug so that the viewers don't see it. I can thwart you by reposting it from time to time.

 

Only to sheeple who take the word of lying schmucks who expect us to believe them with no knowledge of how a crater created by an explosive missile would look. There is no missile that could create the Shanksville crater. That simple.