That has been explained a million times. If you don't understand it then that is your problem not mine. Newton's second law of motion and the third law of motion were not violated on 9/11 but they were only claimed to be violated by the official NIST report. It is impossible to violate natural laws of motion but NIST claimed, and reported, that Newton's laws of motion were in fact violated on 9/11 from 8:30 AM until 9:30 AM on 9/11 with the collapse of two towers, and Newton's laws of motion were again violated from 5:20 PM and 5:22 PM on 9/11 with the collapse of building 7, only in New York City. Nowhere else in the entire world either before or after those times has it ever happened. It was, and is, impossible. Without a doubt.
Jackie picked up JFK brain matter from the trunk and gave it to the doctors at Parkland hospital. That fact is documented.
No you are merely repeating yourself with a little more detail concerning the time. You cannot and never have answered what these laws state and specifically how they were violated. You refuse to do so because you do not even comprehend the laws of physics all you do is repeat that they were violated. - - - Updated - - - Yes it is and much of it was also splattered on the front of the limo. What you ignoe is that the limo was MOVING. Much of the material actually shot up in the air while the car was moving forward under it. This explains how some material landed on the back of the car but not on the front and windshield UNLESS he was shot from behind.
Your inability to understand Newton's laws of motion is your problem not mine. I understand them. Demonstrate with proof that Jackie Kennedy did not hold some of JFK's brain matter in her hand until she saw the doctors at Parkland hospital.
If you understood them you could explain them and then specifically explain how the NISt report claimed they were violated you are incapable of doing neither. I never claimed she did not do this I clearly stated she did you ignored why it is irrelevant
Read the report for yourself: If you understand the laws of physics then you will understand the report. If not then you may be prone to spread a lie. Are you are a liar or are you a teller of truth? NIST
Unlike you I have indeed read it and you are outright lying when you claim it violated the laws of physics. This is why you always run from stating specifically where and how they stated anything of the sort.
I don't run from anything Soupnazi. What are you talking about? - - - Updated - - - Mod Edit ~ Focus on the topic. Don't make it personal. The NIST report is a lie. Read it for yourself.
Explain specifically which laws of physics the NIST report claims were violated. How they were violated and where in the NIST report they made this claim. I have my copy handy right here so include page numbers.
Good grief. Does not anyone anymore understand the laws of motion? Good grief. I am living in a time of total ignorance because of government indoctrination? Why don't you take a physics class? A real physics class. Jonathan Cole explains. If you don't understand the videos then take a physics class for God's sake.
We were discussing the NIST report not a video and you do not understand them if you cannot answer the question. You claimed you never run but that is precisely what you are doing running away from a difficult question you are too ignorant to give a specific answer to
Attention ~ Stop the baiting and insulting. If unable to contribute to the discussion in a positive manner, leave the thread.
it sure is their problem if they can understand newtons laws of physics or use logic and common sense that Jackie retrived brain matter from the back of the limo behind them giving it to the doctors.
It is you lacking comprehension of physics and if you had read the posts you would know that it is irrelevant what she did.
Except the documentary that showed photos of kennedys skull showed a bullet hole dead center in the back (entry) and a large hole front right top (exit.) Debunked.
There was no bias in the source. You CAN debunk something with actual photographs and science, which is what it showed. There was a single hole through the skull, from roughly center of the back to the front right. There was more scientific experimentation with bullet ballistics, timing, etc in that documentary than this edited video in the OP showed. Not to mention the one thing that doesn't lie, the photograph. There is one hole dead in the center of the back of his head. God, you'd think idiots that believe conspiracy theories would at least believe something that a simple photo on wikipedia couldn't prove wrong. Debunked.
Debunked my foot.using proven faked forgeries doesnt debunk anything. the best photography experts around the world have concluded those are forgeries. you would think that idiots who believe in the conspiracy theory of the governments that oswald was the lone assassin would take the time to listen to what the doctors said.what the dallas doctors saw was TOTALLY different than what that fake photo shows. why is it that magic bullet theorists always bltantly ignore facts what the dallas doctors said they saw and what photography experts from around the world say? comedy gold.