Well, I've been debating holocaust deniers for more than 15 years now, so its not slander, its actually an astute observation of the tactics employed by revisionists. From the laughably inept psuedo-science of Leuchter, to the "no true scotsman" crap of Zundel. From that inept idiot Krege to the ridiculous ramblings of Rudolph. The blatant lying of Cole to the antics of the IHR to John "don't look in the right place" ball. Slander? What is slander and outright jew hatred is denying that the Nazi's perpetrated mass murder on an industrial scale. Thru overwork, starvation, neglect, gas, beatings, experimentation, shooting, and hanging they managed to murder millions of jews, roms, gays, handicapped and other innocent civilians.
I love it when Holocaust deniers claim that the 800,000 Jews that were shipped to Treblinka were then shipped out of Treblinka. when you ask them for evidence, they say "got any evidence it DIDNT happen??" lol!!!!! too funny.
Nonsense. If they were not killed they were transited, if they killed they were not transited. You have no evidence of anything. You just repeat falsehoods ad nauseam.
we have evidence that they were sent to Treblinka. we have no evidence they were shipped away from Treblinka. use some common sense as to what happened to them.
Remember your assertion that "how to be a revisionist" was slander? 2. Heads-I-Win-Tails-You-Lose -- Demand that all evidence for the Holocaust be proved genuine (dodging any discussion of what that proof would consist of), and also demand that all your unsubstantiated assertions be proved false. That way, you never bear any burden of proof. I have always found it laughable that deniers are so myopic they cannot see the mountains of evidence surrounding them. Apparently all 10,000 or so nazis put on trial after the war were lying or were tortured for "confessions". Even Eichmann lied about everything. All that Einsatzgruppen documentation (both direct orders and reports) along with photographic evidence, forensic evidence, eyewitnesses were lying. The extensive documentation of priority rail transport for 800,000 jews to treblinka were fake, not to mention the eyewitnesses were lying and of course the mass graves found there were fake. (Krege was an idiot that even magnotto had to denounce) Watch the Fred Leuchter film, Mr.Death to see how utterly inept he was. Watch Cole's BLATANT lies on his videos. Examine Ball's ridiculous analysis of aerial recon of Baba Yar (he examined the wrong place!). Holocaust denial is not a legitimate academic pursuit. It is a pathetic attempt to rehabilitate Nazis and express extreme jew hatred.
http://www.nizkor.org/faqs/reinhard/reinhard-faq-13.html http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/orgs/israeli/yad-vashem/yvs16-11.html
I highly suggest that you all watch the following video that I am about to link. It gives a very informed and educated position on how the gas chambers at Auschwitz were not really used to kill people.
I've already answered this. I understand ad nauseam repetition is a favorite of the dishonest, the dishonest who fail to acknowledge the previous answer. You have scant evidence they went there, and no evidence of what happened to them after. There is evidence Treblinka was a transit camp and no evidence of any killing facilities or graves at the small camp. So the most likely answer is they were deported further East.
You are spewing lies. There is plenty of evidence of massive graves using GPR but unlike that incompetent idiot Krege, it was conducted by bone fide scientists. There is plenty of evidence of the operations of treblinka. There are all kinds of eyewitness testimony including confessions. There is definitive forensic evidence and direct testimony to understand exactly what Treblink was. That's pretty dumb. Priority rail transport for a million people while a war is being fought on two fronts all of them terminating at Treblinka? What possible justification Is "most likely" for such an enormous and militarily unproductive allocation of much needed war fighting resources? Just dumb.
Argument from ignorance. The idiot who thought this up just can't believe that people can be that evil. That people still think it was a good idea proves that the argument fails.
Mein Kampf predates those two speeches, it was a best seller in Germany, and it explicitly outlines the conquest of the east. Therefore we National Socialists have purposely drawn a line through the line of conduct followed by pre-War Germany in foreign policy. We put an end to the perpetual Germanic march towards the South and West of Europe and turn our eyes towards the lands of the East. We finally put a stop to the colonial and trade policy of pre-War times and pass over to the territorial policy of the future. But when we speak of new territory in Europe to-day we must principally think of Russia and the border States subject to her. This colossal Empire in the East is ripe for dissolution. And the end of the Jewish domination in Russia will also be the end of Russia as a State. We are chosen by Destiny to be the witnesses of a catastrophe which will afford the strongest confirmation of the nationalist theory of race. But it is our task, and it is the mission of the National Socialist Movement, to develop in our people that political mentality which will enable them to realize that the aim which they must set to themselves for the fulfilment of their future must not be some wildly enthusiastic adventure in the footsteps of Alexander the Great but industrious labour with the German plough,for which the German sword will provide the soil. http://greatwar.nl/books/meinkampf/meinkampf.pdf