Apparently, only one of about ten witnesses is willing to be interviewed for an upcoming documentary pertaining to the twenty four hours prior to when one of the (supposed) hijacker's committed their dastardly deed. Why only one? Are the rest being threatened, or intimidated from speaking out in some manner? Seems to me that people would be eager to come forward to verify what they saw when the truth is supposed to be so very clear. Would anyone agree? The link below: http://www.911truth.org/still-silent-atta-alomari-portland-maine/
To set the record straight? Cash? If the story was the complete truth, I would think our leaders would be coaxing these folks to come forward and help restore some of their credibility that they've eroded over the years. There would be a host of reasons to further substantiate the whole truth, I would think. Why WOULDN'T they? (I can think of a few reasons). Fear of retaliation, for one.
Ahh, the ridicule has reared it's head once more. - - - Updated - - - Of course they do, (especially when they fear the retaliation) and who can really blame them? - - - Updated - - - You obviously want us to believe that is true, undoubtedly. - - - Updated - - - Not to mention holes, lies, exclusions, fabrications, propaganda, etc. It's all there.
Not ridicule...truth And you've proven NO 'holes,lies.exclusions,OR propaganda'......clock is ticking,boys...
Again, the ridicule. Is there anything else? - - - Updated - - - Call it whatever suits you but, it's still ridicule and I think we could have videos combined with signed confessions of all the players and you'd still maintain your support of that version of events. The clock is indeed ticking, on all of us.
You have been handed evidence PLENTY - and have refused to accept it as evidence. that is clearly your problem.
http://www.ae911truth.org/signatures/ae.html All of these folks seem to disagree with 'we'. I just wish the ones that advocate 9/11 was exactly as presented, would be a bit more agreeable that it doesn't pass the stink test (or at least acknowledge that what is officially claimed can't possibly be true). That would something anyway.
I'm beginning to wonder why seemingly reasonably intelligent people fight so hard to keep such a discussion closed? Seems there's much to consider. PLENTY of evidence, indeed (and it's easy enough to disprove the original claims). People just can't accept the truth, I guess?
They can disagree all they want..won't make their claims true. As for your 'stink test'...LOL - - - Updated - - - Still waiting for your 'plenty' of evidence
Well, alright. I guess you respond in pretty much the same way everybody else does then? (and again with the ridicule).
All the witnesses are buried on Bushes ranch. OK I know I'm starting trouble but I like watching them jump around with their heads on fire.
Exactly what is this thread asking for apart from completely unfounded speculation from both sides? What a waste of time.
I'm not ridiculing other people's posts the largest percentage of the time either. I just point out the obvious. The bar isn't set by me, I don't think. - - - Updated - - - If the truth was crystal clear, no speculation would be needed.