I have entered into discussion here, with the idea of making a point, and that point being we can clearly see what was done, and that is evidence plenty, however people press demands that I explain in detail not only what was done, but HOW it was done, not happening. We Citizens, were treated to a show on 9/11/2001 a lot of staged action & special effects, when you see a movie, you can tell that certain things are special effects, and its not necessary to know HOW it was done, but you can see and appreciate what was done. Fact is, the mainstream media and our "leaders" supported a story that includes radical Islamic hijackers flying airliners into buildings and yet, there isn't any PROOF of this and the people who support the official story are now engaging in psychological warfare to maintain their position, because there is no hard evidence to show that suicidal hijackers crashed airliners into the WTC or Pentagon. When I get badgered & pressed for detail and at the same time the others on this forum give answers such as "gravity" and all they will say is basically "gravity works" What am I to think? To the casual reader of this forum, to the "lurkers" if you are sitting on the fence ( still at this late date ) Please do make an effort to sort out the psychological warfare from the REAL data that you need to make up your own mind as to what may or may not have happened on 9/11/2001. Thank U and Good Night .......
God forbid that you are asked to explain your own thinking and claims. You started to express ideas that stepped into a realm you have no knowledge of whatsoever (structural design and engineering). When people more knowledgeable than you in this area try to explain things that's what you're going to do? Just clam up and refuse to answer? Especially when it gets to complicated for you? Typical. I expected nothing less.
I agree. Here's a link to some of the real datal in case you don't know where to look for it. http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=348380&p=1063729867#post1063729867 Also, don't be taken in by the "No plane" theory. It was thought up by some public relations experts to discredit the truth movement. Real 9/11 truthers believe that robot planes hit the towers. "provocateurs,shills and disinfo agents" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYedTmaHt1A (7:20 time mark) 9/11: The Absurdity of the No-Planes-in-New York Theory http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV4rvTxcMSY 92 views clockwise attacking WTC 2 (no planes theory debunked) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wtu9r_v-XHE THE INFOWARRIOR with Jason Bermas (HD) No Planes Theory on 9/11 is Total BS!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBMOxLkhilU
I've personally witnessed the other side in here refusing to answer questions and ignore evidence, and obvious lies via the Kean Commission/Warren Commission style load of propaganda generated from them too so, I guess we're even?
You're "evidence" is continually debunked. When will anyone from your side provide mathematics and calculations showing what they think happened was even remotely possible? 12+ years and nothing. Pathetic.
"Debunked", only as far as the other side is concerned? If an honest discussion could be had, perhaps a better outcome could be achieved.
Another no planer OP with no direction or purpose other than to again show the total willful ignorance of no planers.
"robot planes"...really? Where did all the passengers go? How about the families whose loved one didn't return home that day?...Are they just lying? Do you people ever think past your BULSH claims?
You guys have had "movements" throughout a 12+ year timeframe. You have had your chances to present math based/calculation based arguments and you've presented nothing at all. Where are all the engineers that support the truthers? Less than 1% of the engineering community in 12+ years. Pathetic.
Oh please. That's just wrong, inaccurate, or just flat out untruthful. The evidence is there, in plain view. Half of the American people smell a rat about 9-11. (The other 50% are slow thinkers).
Haha. 50% ... you are way off. Where is the debate in the worldwide engineering community? The outcries for justice? The papers published? Yeah ... there's no movement, unless you count backward as movement.
Just a note for the people who say its been 12 years for heaven's sake why are you still at this, and note the history, there was a movement started MANY years before women actually got the vote, and they had perseverance and stuck with the cause because it was right. Seek JUSTICE and never give up!
Half the country's population doesn't buy the BS we were fed about 9-11 (and even higher percentages outside the country).
I notice that comments have been disabled for this video, this guy doesn't want to know what people think about the video? also video of whatever hit the North tower, does not indicate that it was for certain a hijacked airliner, what if it was a missile? There are all sorts of possibilities here, and to stick with the assumption that the only way that the attack could have happened was with hijacked airliners is so very limiting.
How about facts like details of how an aircraft would have had to function in the act of penetrating the WTC tower wall? The probabilities involved, the known facts about aircraft performance and would it be at all possible to hit the WTC at 590 mph, ( that bit has NEVER been put to rest, it is still a question and will be until some agent of Boeing steps up to actually provide INFORMATION ) can an airliner keep its shape while being forced to decelerate at >10 g? What about all the luggage/cargo that will break loose of whatever is supposed to be holding it in place? ever see a large truck with the load shifting?
You have been given the mathematical calculations and you were unable to provide anything to refute it. Take the blinders off and really look at the evidence.