The HSCA concluded a probable second shooter but that conclusion was based on one piece of evidence proven wrong leaving Oswald as the only shooter . That is fact. I have read more conspiracy theory books than you and demosntrated why they are wrong. That is fact. The magic bullet theory has been proven a lie which was created by conspiracy theorists and you fell for it and cling to it despite proof it is false. That is fact. Regardless of what many have claimed the shoots fired by Oswald were easily duplicated by many people both expert and average. That is fact. You are crushed by facts every time
oh and whats even more funny forgot to mention,is how the magic bullet theorists always whine and cry in defeat after going into meltdown mode like they always do and like he did with you in every post,after they always get backed up against the wall and are cornered with facts they cant refute.they can only sling crap in defeat and whine about being taken to school everyday. they are always left doing this after going into meltdown mode.
I'm always amazed that when people say that, and show the clip of the headshot, that they can't see the blood and brain spray go forward for a split second from the force of the billet from behind, and then the limo catches up to the spray, as it's also moving forward. Never mind the rest of the physical evidence proving the shot was from the Texas Book Depository.
oh yeah the fake spray they added in,Okay. lol. there is one poster in this section who trolls all the time ignoring the facts that there was a conspiracy and there is ZERO evidence there was a shot from the 6th floor windown always humiliating and embarrassing himself having hundreds of people come on here and laughed at his lies he makes up all the time constantly ending up with egg on his face all the time. you really don't want to go there and embarrass and humilate yourself like he has with hundreds of people on here in the past and say Oswald was the lone assassin to end up humiliating and embarrassing yourself like he does everyday and end up with egg on your face as well now do you?
Your claim that the spray was fake and added in does not make it fake and added in. You have no evidence that it was fake and added in making it quite real and evidence that you are wrong. The rest of your post is spam. The evidence crushes and embarrasses you and no one else proving that Oswald fired 3 shots from the TSBD.
I'm never humiliated by the truth. There is no evidence of a second or more shooter. The 2 bullets that hit people come from above and behind the limousine, as shown in the Zapruder film and the autopsy. the path of the single bullet that hit Kennedy and Connally present a straight path back to upper floors of the Texas Book Depository. And the CTers can't provide any evidence supporting their claims. - - - Updated - - - Yep. Every single conspiracy theory has proven that the CTers depend on a lot of names and events that they can't provide evidence for, unless it's forgeries.
Only 40 plus medical witnesses who observed a large blow-out exit wound in the back of K's head proving a shot from the front which could not have been done by LHO.
and dont forget all the witnesses who said they saw a rifleman behind the picket fence firing the rifle who then were meant with harrassment by authoritys to change their story. there were way too many bullets photographed all over the place that day as well that screams multiple shooters.they never have any answers for all these multiple bullets photographed that day that could not be traced back to oswald. love the logic of the lone nut theorists.the warren commission was so biased of an investigation its a sick joke It doesnt even touch on many key facts such as several of the witnesses testimony were altered by the warren commission,itself an illegal act,or the many unnaccountable bullets found that day like an entrance shot to the windshield that forensic officers said was an indeed an entrance shot,or the bullet photographed in the doorframe,or the one on the curb that was replaced two days later and plastered over with,or the one on the street marked by an officer,and the one in the street sign seen in the zapruder film that witnesses saw which was taken down and replaced a day later, or the one where a police officer is seen picking it up one off the grass and putting it in his pocket and walking away with it illegally removing evidence and according to two women, they altered the testimony of two theirs of having gone down the same stairway the warren commission said oswald went down during the same timeframe.altering their timeframe they gave. again they altered many witnesses testimony.a crime itself. you all are also ignorant of the testimony of Rose Cherimae, whom you see in the beginning of the film JFK she was a woman found on the side of a highway in Louisiana by a highway patrol officer who was taken to a hospital and told doctors a couple days before the assassination that there was a plot to kill kennedy.that there were MEN traveling to dallas to kill kennedy.they did not take her serious at first because she was found to be on drugs, but after the assassination,they then took her seriously and called the dallas police,and how conveinent for the government that she ended up dying mysteriously after that. many witnesses who came forward and gave testimony that did not fit the governments version of events ended up dying mysteriously.in fact,some witnesses kept quiet for many years because they were afraid of winding up as mysterious deaths if they camer forward and talked about a gunman they saw firing a rifle behind the picket fence.Now they are old and close to death so they dont care anymore and are no longer afraid. you lone nut theorists have no answers for any of these facts. they always fall flat on their faces with egg all over their faces EVERYTIME failing to refute these facts everytime.
as any open minded objective person can also see rouser,by viewing this video and watching just like the first 15 minutes of it,you can see the photographs of all the multiple bullets that I was talking about taken that day that could not be traced back to oswald showing there are indeed too many bullets for too few rifles. the best argument the magic bullet theorists have is that he was PART of a conspiracy but they still end up with egg on their faces humiliating themselves there as well http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSakrYOpJ5s
They saw a large wound they did not see an exit blow out wound. None of them were experts in gun shot wounds or pathologists. Bullet wounds are not so simple clear cut and dry as television has taught you to believe. The medical evidence proves that this wound they saw was inflicted by a shot from behind and above which IS consistent with Oswald's position. Most of those witnesses only casually obsevred this wound from the front they were not even present when the body was turned over exposing the wound. There testimony while basically honest is simply not valid or even in synch with the conclusion you reach from it. - - - Updated - - - No witnesses claimed to have seen a man behind the fence shooting a rifle and no other bullets were photographed as you claim. As usual you confuse spam with truth and end up embarrassed. No witnsses died abnormally or were afraid to come forward either.
A single witness could be mistaken or lying. But 40 plus each confirming the other is a slam dunk. The real unaltered autopsy photos (if they exist) remain in a locked closet. And for good reason.
And tens of millions of hollywood movie watchers still believe a gunshot impact will send a body hurtling across a room...the laws of physics still rule supreme, he was shot from behind...
Not a single one of them can show it was a frontal shot. And the shot from above and behind is consistent with the Zapruder film, showing the head shot, and the spray moving forward.
Many witnesses can be mistaken or lying especially when they do not agree on the details. The 40 witnesses you cite are not in synch with each other sorry for your luck
The only "detail" they need to agree on is the fact, that they observed a large blow-out wound in the back of K's head -- for you, a very inconvenient truth. Sorry for your luck.
They did not all agree on this therefor it is not an incomvenient truth at all. They agreed on a large wound and nothing more. This in no way proves or indicates a shot from the front
A large wound in the back of K's head certainly does not prove a shot from the back. Gunshot forensics postulate that an exit wound is large; entrance wound is small.
Gun shot forensics do not postulate any such thing. Such large exit wounds and small entrance are more common on the body or limbs than the head. The head has a unique bone structure compared to the rest of the body and much like an egg shell a wound from any direction can cause a massive gaping hole to appear. I never claimed that the gaping wound proved a shot from behind I stated that the medical evidence gathered at the AUTOPSY proves a shot from behind and it does. That is fact which these witnesses do not refute or challenge. None of them performed autopsy none of them were pathologists few of them had any experience in bullet wounds and all of them saw his head while he was lying on his back. This means they only casually observed part of the wound and nothing more. All of them were emergency room doctors this means their specialty was saving lives NOT evaluating wounds for evidence. None of their statements is evidence of anything refuting the autopsy. - - - Updated - - - From behind not from the front. No bullet fragments were recovered except at the front of the limo.
The chief autopsy doc was Commander Humes. The Parkland docs had much more experience with gunshot wounds than did Humes who had none, zero, natta.
yeah someone obviously doesnt know anything at all about ballistics.hee hee - - - Updated - - - it falls on deaf ears.logic and common sense is not soemthing the magic bullet theorists are familiar with.
you should start a comedy club.YOU need to bone up on the laws of physics which every junior high school kid always learns at that age that the laws of physics prove your head goes FORWARD if shot from behind.you hit a golfball,it goes forward,same as getting hit by a bullet.miserable fail.