It really doesn't take "math" to get the concept that in order to produce the result at documented, WTC7 would have had ALL of the support out from under the North & West walls go away and all at the same time. how is that possible with a "progressive" collapse?
Do you get "SCIENCE 101" ..... (?) Dr Sunder of the NIST explained free fall to all who would hear, very simply that when anything is in free fall acceleration, there is clearly nothing under it to resist the fall.
So in your interpretation of events, the fires in WTC7 were sufficient to cause the total removal of any & all resistance out from under the North & West walls of the tower, such that 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration happened? is that how you see it?
Where is the "worldwide engineering community" when it comes to facing the challenge and addressing the issue and claiming the bragging rights to having defeated "9/11 Truth" ?
The issue has been addressed and the 'truth movement' is long since faded to the point of obscurity. Like the flat earth society, only a few fringe clingers and exploiters remain.
You may believe that the movement is dead, but there is a LOT of life to be seen and the fact is, the evidence does NOT support the 19 suicidal hijackers story. Where is the proof that hijacked airliners were used as weapons? Fact is, if AMERICA doesn't come to its senses about this one, the next false flag will be so much worse.
Where is the physical proof that 4 hijacked airliners were used as weapons? Just to cite one example, the crash ( or rather alleged crash ) at the Pentagon, the aircraft would have had at a min 50 tons of aluminum, and the fire was said to have destroyed the aircraft, however, if the aluminum melted, there would be a blob of 50 tons of melted aluminum, and if it burned up in the fire, there would be more than 50 tons of aluminum oxide to deal with, question, where is it?
I'm arguing from the alleged "evidence" in that if the mass quantities of aircraft bits could not be found at the Pentagon, the common argument is that the fire destroyed the aircraft as if burning up, meant the total disappearance of the aircraft. If not by fire, then what do you think accounts for the disappearance of "FLT77"?
False argument: no one said mass quantities of the aircraft could not be found. Most of the plane, its contents, DNA from the passengers and their personal effects ... PLUS both black boxes were all recovered at the Pentagon.
and by what means was the aircraft accounted for? somebody took a few snap-shots of aircraft wreckage and that is the final on this? what?
No. Read the PENTTBOM report. The rubble was carefully sifted, looking for remains of people and other evidence.
The links to the "PENTTBOM" that you gave me + subsequent searches on the web, turned up NO data at all as to the search for anything at the Pentagon, 9/11/2001 is a most poorly documented event. If you have a pointer to the data that you allege to be, why not share it? what do you have? "PENTTBOM"?
I have attempted to find the bits that you refer to, however so fall all of my searches have come up empty, if you personally have seen this document, please supply a link to where it is, and a pointer to the specific location of the data in question within this "document".
Say ... did you ever find all those pictures of the Challenger you claimed were everywhere? Still waiting on you to point to those, too. Thanks.
Difference here is that a simple web-search turns up an abundance of pix where as the web-search on "PENTTBOM" turns up none of the data that you allege to be present. I leave it to the random lurker on this forum to make up their own minds.... have a nice day : )