Obama is a clear and present danger to the American way of life. There are MANY reasons to impeach this pro-Thug, anti-Israel president, but I am putting the two major reasons on the table 1) the Benghazi attack cover-up 2) a failure to defend borders from illegal immigration Please vote for your option. Thanks, Saul Cohen
There was no cover up re: Benghazi and no president in the past 50 years has been very concerned with border security or illegal immigration.
There are NO reasons to impeach President Obama. . .And the REASONABLE people in the GOP know that. . .or they would already have tried! In fact, what do you think ISSA's witch hunts and the MANY "investigations" into Benghazi were all about? They were trying to find SOMETHING, ANYTHING that they could throw on the wall and make it stick. . .but they simply made fools of themselves. And now, it is Bush and Cheney who are in danger to be arrested if they leave the US for their WAR CRIMES!
I don't think either one is an impeachable offense. But then I remember illegal immigration includes Obama's executive amnesty. That's about as close as you can come to an impeachable offense with this pair.
What about the amnesty by Bush? AND, President Obama's executive order places a lot of limitations on who can stay in the US legally, and the process to do so! It is NOTHING like "free to all" amnesty!
Really? Why don't you show a link that says that he wants to give EVERY illegal immigrants amnesty? And a link that he "spies on Americans" any more than the Bush White house? And obviously, a link that shows that "he wants to take everyone's gun!" Your comment is so full of crap and lies that you do not need to identify yourself as a "tea party" member! Get some FACTS and come back when you grow up! - - - Updated - - - Yep. ..and Obama made sure he made that very clear! He actually INVITED the Congress to do their job. . . but they haven't yet! So. . . someone has to take leadership! Duh!
I have to say, it really shows how the left craves strong man rule. I guess that's why you guys fall in love with brutal dictators. But as far as the issue of the thread goes, impeachment isn't so much a legal action as a political action. And right now, although a legal argument might be made that the President has broken US law by assassinating American citizens overseas or that he doesn't have the legal right to create the DACA amnesty or the most current one, there is no political argument for it. Remember, Clinton actually committed a felony by lying under oath during a deposition and he beat that in the Senate, not because they didn't find that he had committed the crime, but because politically the Dems stuck with their own. So there will be no impeachment. Obama could sacrifice an infant to Baal on live TV and there would be no impeachment. Hopefully, Obama will spend the next two years on the golf course and he can go down in history as a lesson learned when the country applies the same standards in electing a President as they do for American Idol.
Not a bad post, not one I agree with but not badly written. What gets to me is the almost monstrous arrogance of the Republicans in thinking the American public must WANT to have them threaten to overturn elections TWICE in two decades. I would think they might show at least a LITTLE respect for the will of the people rather than their plutocrat masters. If they're just too damned obvious in showing who they owe their real loyalty too then eventually all the money in the world won't be enough to fool anyone, not even the amazingly stupid. To paraphrase a truly great man who must literally spin in his grave when he sees what his Party has become. "You can fool all of the people some of the time, and then we have Republicans"
Well I don't think the majority of Republicans are supportive of impeachment, for much the reasons I gave; it just isn't going to happen. It's not about overturning elections, unless you think the impeachment power in itself is wrong. If you oppose the idea that the Congress should have that power, your argument is with the US Constitution, not me. But don't be fooled by all the impeachment propaganda. That was pushed by the left media and Obama himself because he wanted to goad the Republicans into impeachment before the elections to create a backlash for Republicans. Even on this forum, a few months ago when the impeachment talk was hot and heavy, most of the threads started here about it were started by leftists.
Sure, dear! I guess one should wonder what the GOP really think of the President. . .because the accusations towards Obama vary from day to day from "weak, lame duck and pushover," to "Anti Christ and dictator!" You guys are so funny! I guess it is really bothering the Right that President Obama's popularity at this time in his presidency is now much higher than Bush and about the same level as the Right's Hero: Reagan!
I would vote to impeach him, if we also impeached every member of congress, and clean out the entire lot of those treasonous, corrupt bastards. And for the simplest of reasons. None of them represent the best interests of the American People. They, even the dems, represent the owners of this Corporate/Police/Intelligence State, and have destroyed, sold out, our Republic.
If you really are a Democrat, you are from the same roots as the tea party from the Republicans! In any case. . . your stand is very weird but amusing!
One doesn't need to be from the Tea Party to oppose President Obama's abuse of presidential power. But so far it's only a mild thing. We only got two choices in the poll. And, weird but amusing is probably a good description of me.
This is why this poll is WORTHLESS and I chose not to answer. The person having written that poll is OBVIOUSLY ignorant of the ethical practice that makes a poll valid or a complete waste of time. By the way. . . here is what President Obama's legacy will REALLY look like: http://www.lovebscott.com/news/roll...ost-successful-presidents-in-american-history
I guess your survival instinct is more developed than your integrity to recognize fairness and right from wrong. That is at least something.
Really? You only give two options, with no 'other' choice? So you realize this poll is in no way representative, right? The best case against Obama is the killing of American citizens, particularly the case in Yemen where he ordered a drone strike on an American citizen who never partook in terrorist activity, but was an outspoken Muslim radical (who voiced support of terrorism). Basically an Islamic extremist community organizer. Neither of the options you gave are good grounds for impeachment. Both are simply cases of the President bumbling a public situation.
Love Oboma much? You defense of him sounds more like some 'gentle giant's' mom praising how their thug type son was a good boy and did nothing.