Some scenes of the moon landing were filmed in a studio but the moon landings did take place and the only reason some scenes of the moon landing were filmed in a studio was because of equipment which was classified could not of been shown to the public.
The technical details have been public info for decades now. Not a plausible theory. Especially as there is no evidence that any of it was faked
There's a mountain of evidence that it was faked. http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-landing/347662-apollo-moon-missions-were-faked-studio.html NASA has also destroyed it's crediblility by taking the position that the Chinese spacewalk was real when the anomalies in it prove it was faked. http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=362999&page=2&p=1064028979#post1064028979
There is no evidence it was faked all of your links lead to claims which have been proven false. Each and every post of hours has been irrefutably debunked. The Chinese space walk was real and no anomoly proves otherwise
No Scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c,there's Not, just a lot of manufactured hogwash from people like YOU.
You mean there's a mountain of nonsense relinked and repeated by a chorus of clueless kooks. And no again, the Chinese spacewalk was quite genuine and in no way shown to have been faked. The claims revolve around bits of debris flying from/by the craft, which actually happens quite commonly in orbit. They weren't any ******ned "water bubbles." You aren't clever for sitting in your basement, watching YouTube and deciding that space missions were faked for no good reason by public institutions that have to justify their budgets and actions to elected representatives and other public officials, who themselves would have no interest in "faking" space exploration when something to stupid as that would easily cost them their careers if not their freedom.
There is no proof of a hoax, we've covered this. The entire internet has covered it for nearly two decades and debunked every single piece of poor science, poor observation, poor conclusions, pure deception and outright lies. Your repetition of the same spammed nonsense is quite appalling. You can't make the infallible landing proof go away.
Betamax destroyed his credibility a long time ago. (post #12) http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=362999&page=2&p=1064028979#post1064028979 He's not to be taken seriously.
You have never offered evidence or even a logical argument. You really have no business criticizing the credibility of others. The lunar landings were real as was the Chinese space walk. You have never challenged those facts.
I wish the American astronauts met Russian Cosmonauts on the moon, and had low gravity wrestling matches for rights to plant flag.
Yes I have. http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-landing/347662-apollo-moon-missions-were-faked-studio.html http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=362999&page=2&p=1064028979#post1064028979
No you never have. Reposting the same things means nothing. All of your claims which you repost have been debunked and PROVEN false
Everybody viewing your stock, spammed response will see two things:- Number 1, you studiously avoid responding to my posts with anything other than your spam. Number 2, you think your opinion means something. As I have said before, when the judge of my credibility is somebody like you, it is meaningless. You point to a discussion where your points were answered and taken apart as some confirmation that you are correct. A truly bizarre thing to do. You still fail to even respond to the original obvious debunk of that off topic spam! By the way, nobody agrees with you on anything. If you find a poster who is as gullible as you, maybe then you might get a positive response.
The first anomaly on this list is that of the flag's moving without having been touched. http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-landing/347662-apollo-moon-missions-were-faked-studio.html You have the attitude that you're winning the whole time you're losing when the flag is discussed. You even doctored a video to try to mislead the viewers. http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-landing/362999-air-caused-flag-move-so-obviously-studio-12.html What's the point of staying and debating with you if you such obvious stuff like that? All of the viewers can see it; they don't need me to point it out. The anomaly of the buoyant cables in the faked Chinese spacewalk is pretty hard to obfuscate. Yet, you tried anyway. http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-...d-moon-july-20-1969-sir-questions-sir-12.html As I've said before, there's a point at which things are so clear that sophistry becomes ineffective so your always making the last post and doing the victory dance isn't going to sway any thinking people. You might as well insist that a picture of a pig is really a picture of a chicken. What's a truther supposed to do with a Black Knight who won't recognize he's wrong? Monty Python-The Black Knight https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKhEw7nD9C4 He'll insist that a picture of a pig is really a picture of a chicken forever. How long should the truther stay and keep pointing out that pigs don't have feathers?
The flag behaves in a manner impossible in atmosphere,,,And a person walking by wouldn't displace atmosphere to have the flag wave,which it did not. As for the chinese spacewalk,just another red herring by you to muddy the waters...no one cares about it,And actually you fit the profile of the black knight....
I wonder it he people who believe the moon landing was faked also think Columbus' journey to America was also staged.