Every wonder why no protesters show up at democrat rallys

Have you noticed that there are very few if any thug protesters that show up at Hillary and Sanders rallies.

IMO it is because republicans that might protest have job they have to go to, so they cant.

Too bad all the thug protesters that show up at Trump and Cruz rallies dont go out and get a job!!!!!!

 

Because the Rightwing talkin' heads say that protestin' is for communist Muslim gays and I ain't one of them.

 

So if Republicans can't show up to protest at Democratic rallies, because "they have job they have to go to"...

how do they show up at REPUBLICAN rallies???

- - - Updated - - -

Unless it's the annual January protest in D.C. against Roe v. Wade.....

or a rally to support Kim Davis against gay marriage....

or a Tea Party rally to protest Government spending by folks on Social Security and Medicare.

 

The answer used to be in my signature:

Emotional Liberals = Social Activists = Opposers of Free Speech = Anti-Constitutionalists = Anarchists

Not many emotional conservatives any more other than a few die-hard, late-term abortion provider protesters

 

And the "talking head" seem to be right!!!!

- - - Updated - - -

Simple-------------People with jobs can take vacation days. But they dont take time off to be thugs at rallies.

 

1. And we know you believe those talking heads. Every post shows you for a loyal ditto-head and/or Hannitized....am I right?

2. So they "take vacation days" to go to GOP rallies, but if somebody is protesting a GOP rally that person "doesn't have a job"?

Noooooooo, that's not partisan and contradictory one little bit. Mega-dittos.

 

Show me a group of thug republicans that think that cops should be killed that has shown up at a Hillary rallly.

 

LOL!

As far as I recall the OP is actually retired and on SS.

So, why doesn't he go to protest at Hillary rallies? He'd sure have the time for it.

 

There's an easy fix for that!

Just encourage the Donald to urge his audience to show up at Bernie Sanders and Clinton rallies in full regalia and make noise!

Why, they may even go as far as to sucker punch a few people!

But, I'm betting that the sort of cowards that do things like that would rather shout at the AM radios than engage with real people.

 

Like these?

 

Demographics confirm that most of the Fox and Limbaugh audience, and a substantial number of Trump's supporters are also retired and on SS.

Which give them no excuse!

 

How about some thug republicans who think sucker-punching protestors AND THEN threatening to kill that same protestor?



- - - Updated - - -

Another of those "Keep Your Gov't Hands Off My Medicare" Tea Partyers, no doubt.

 

because they believe in freedom of speech

as i recall only nazis go out and break up the other parties rallies.

 

You are right. The Nazis were the first party that pretty much first made a habit of sending out thugs to break up other party rallies.

Liberals really get their underlovelies in a wad when you accuse them of using Nazi tactics tho.

 

Who sucker-punched Rakeem Jones in Fayetteville, NC...."a liberal"???

 

Oh, they show up. They just don't get physically assaulted for no reason like they do at GOPer rallies.

 

In all fairness, much of last week's media cycle involved Bill Clinton's exchange with a BLM protestor

 

Spot on my friend, spot on.

It's all about the emotions.

Blame it on bad milk feeding mothers or too many years of Shakespeare, liberals are emotionally-driven people in every part of their life.

 

your comparing battery of one person with breaking up of a political rally. While battery is criminal it did not stop any bernie sanders rallies from promoting its candidate.

 

Provide evidence that this has happened at any other GOP rallies.

You won't, of course, because you fabricated the claim.

- - - Updated - - -

That's right. Nazis did incite their supporters to violence against the opposition.

So does Donald Trump. We have plenty of video.

 

Having jobs and responsibilities is, I'm sure, part of it, but I think the larger part is just the mentality of the left and right.

The left seems much more on the attack and on the offensive than the right is. The left don't just disagree with other viewpoints, they don't want them to be heard at all. That's why they are the ones behind colleges banning so many speakers. It's not the college Republicans who are trying to ban speakers, it's the left groups. They really are like brownshirts. They want to disrupt, intimidate, and silence the opposition. The right is just not there mentality wise.

Hopefully that doesn't change but as the left gets more crazed, who knows what will happen?

 

They do. BLM protestors were going after Sanders for a while. They interrupted Hillary a few times too.

 

but some do take days off to kill people that they disagree with on Abortion it seems

or take time off to do armed take overs federal building, can you imagine if BLM did a armed take over of a federal building?

and if were gonna apply the BLM to all the left, then we must apply the KKK to all the right.... right?

.

 

That's fascinating! Most of the Fox audience is retired? And Limbaugh's too? Where is the proof of that?

 

I find your comment confusing, but I see what you are trying to do. You want to establish some sort of moral equivalence between the left and the right on this issue by dragging the KKK and abortion...not sure where you are going with the abortion thing, but first, no one disputes that BLM is a left group, and an accepted one. Bernie and Hillary have not tried to disavow them, and in fact no major lefty groups do. They all accept BLM as a legitimate group, nor do they criticize their tactics.

The KKK on the other hand, is always disavowed on the right. There are no major groups or candidates that support the KKK or their tactics. So your comparison is invalid.