LOL< You can TRY. We have not chosen to be progressives because we have not heard other ideological perspectives. Trump's ideas are not nearly as original or exotic as you may imagine. Even if they were, progressives do not want someone like Trump 'implementing' them. Its a waste of anyone's time. Whatever Sander's supporters Trump may acquire( between 4-10) are so weak of will and understanding of what progressivism is, that we'd be glad to be rid of them.
Whether that's so or not, the chances of Trump picking up many Sanders supporters is very low. They do not see him as someone who will benefit them, or the country.
Being a lefty means being delusional-there's too great a record of failure for there to be any other explanation. These are the same guys who think Obamacare is working, and Hillary is not in deep trouble with the FBI.
These are interesting times for the collective. A new class of drone has emerged and is causing mass disruption in the group think. This new drone, the Sanders class, was designed to be a minimalist; saving resources by becoming a moralistic socialist. Maximum production, minimal upkeep. However, the central nexus (the global club of billionaires) that run the collective, engages in highly corrupt activity in the name of the greater good. Normal drones turn a blind eye to the corruption because the "ends justify the means". However, the Sanders class drones are programmed to resist corruption. They do not comply with the "ends justify the means" doctrine of the central nexus. They are actively resisting the will of the central nexus and causing a large divide between the old and the new. Even worse, the Sanders class drones rather lose fairly, then win by comprising integrity. A large portion of Sanders class drones have even threated to defect. http://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/18/bernie-sanders-supporters-could-vote-for-donald-trump-expert.html
True. Lot of delusional people out there. People who believed in the "Romney Landslide", etc. Trump's Campaign is the "Romney Landslide" of 2016. Lots of delusion out there. That said, Madame POTUS Hillary is a mortal lock.
Another one of those fanatical Clinton supporters who intellectually equaled himself with an average George Bush support. No amount of facts, no amount of evidence enlightens them....I couldn't put it better myself. What a great title! "Young Turks" Panel Meltdown: Are Hillary Voters Ignorant? "They Reject Evidence," "Sound Like Bush Supporters" http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...pect_start_to_sound_like_bush_supporters.html - - - Updated - - - Another one of those fanatical Clinton supporters who intellectually equaled himself with an average George Bush support. No amount of facts, no amount of evidence enlightens them....I couldn't put it better myself. What a great title! "Young Turks" Panel Meltdown: Are Hillary Voters Ignorant? "They Reject Evidence," "Sound Like Bush Supporters" http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/04/20/young_turks_panel_meltdown_are_hillary_voters_ignorant_people_you_respect_start_to_sound_like_bush_supporters.html
Easy, Clinton could die or otherwise become disqualified. Besides that, I think Bernie cares more about keeping the democratic party liberal than winning. Free college is just a stupid idea. Too many people go to college as it is. College isn't sufficiently useful to every kind of person/job to justify its enormous expense, unless you actually believe in the delusion of getting people educated enough to make democratic processes work better than decisions by experts. Yeah I would be very surprised if Sanders went independent... much less surprised if Trump did.
It's actually doubtful that Hillary will be the nominee. If the FBI recommends indictment, which is likely, she will likely suspend her campaign under pressure. Who will be the nominee then, Crazy Joe?
Based on what evidence do you think that likely? I don't think history or the present process back you up on that one. How often do politicians who you think should be indicted actually get indicted? I think you are mixing up what you think the FBI should do with what they are actually likely to do.
The mainstream media, Fox aside, is treating this as a non-issue. They generally just don't mention it at all, because it doesn't look like anything newsworthy is going to happen. Not even Bernie's most ardent supporters and Hillary critics are giving this any credence. How often do politicians who you think should be indicted actually get indicted? What exactly makes this case different?