WIKILeaks Update: Anonymous Proves that Julian Assange Has Been Taken By The CIA! This is a riot.. Did you know that Osama Bin Laden is living in the Bahamas and has an income from the CIA of $200.000 a month? And the UN has pardoned Julian Assange. [video=youtube;ornLNJAQXQ4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ornLNJAQXQ4[/video]
And Dick Cheney is waterboarding Assange in a black location on Mars. Isn't this the same hacktivist outfit that promised to release and disclose all of Hillary Clinton's 30,000+ e-mails within days of the election? As I recall, the timing of their e-mail dump was intended to scuttle Clinton's candidacy AND prevent the Dems from replacing her with another candidate.
Yep... I know this is a piece of insane whimsy, but I couldn't resist.. People all over the internet believe it.
Well, Assange does need to be locked up with the key thrown away for a good long time, devoid of sunlight. No questions asked. I wouldn't discredit Anonymous so fast though. If this would be true, then the process for justice being served has begun. And with no right to a fair trial. And if the UN has pardoned Assange, then that is a mistake on the UN's part, no two ways about it. Assange is a criminal, and doesn't deserve to be pardoned.
It's a valid question. Supporters have been asking for proof of life for about two months now and they still haven't gotten it. Assange is the head of one of the most sophisticated digital outfits in the world, so it would be a trivial matter for him to post a video of himself with a current newspaper in hand. The fact that this has not happened after so many requests is indicative of something fishy. Granted, I do not know one way or the other, but the situation is becoming increasingly suspicious.
Precisely the point. You automatically reject any idea or narrative that falls outside the predetermined limits that have been set for you by a corporate oligarchy. Instead of thinking for yourself and judging a claim based on its logical and evidentiary merits, which is what reasonable people do, you simply parrot a set of political dogmas that were manufactured by the ruling class.
The fact that a "conspiracy theories" subforum even exists, and that this topic was summarily relegated to it, speaks volumes. I doubt the owner of the forum or the moderation could even explain what a "conspiracy theory" is and what distinguishes them from the "Current Events" that characterize the more mainstream discourse that occurs on these types of forums. Apparently, if The New York Times or The Washington Post publishes something, then it's a "current event". But if an organization like Anonymous publishes something, then it's basically a "conspiracy theory". Yet mainstream corporate news networks and publishers are every bit as mendacious and conspiratorial as the average internet kook. Just as one example, they were the ones peddling "conspiracy theories" about Saddam Hussein's weapons programs which later turned out to be false or only partially true. Yet they are not brandished with the label of "conspiracy theorists" for some reason. No, I don't. But I fail to see what that has to do with Assange or Wikileaks or your slavish deference to politically correct orthodoxies.