ISIS has jihadis embedded in refugee population... 'Just wait ' Islamic State reveals it has smuggled THOUSANDS of extremists into Europe Wed, Nov 18, 2015 | AN OPERATIVE working for Islamic State has revealed the terror group has successfully smuggled thousands of covert jihadists into Europe.
Vast majority of refugees to US just since Paris attacks are Muslims... 1 Christian: 236 of 237 Syrian Refugees Admitted Since Paris Attacks Are Muslims December 7, 2015 | – Since the Paris terror attacks on November 13, the State Department has admitted 237 Syrian refugees into the United States – 236 Sunni Muslims and one Christian (0.4 percent), according to data from the State Department Refugee Processing Center. See also: To Prevent Terrorism, US Should Halt Immigration From 'High Risk' Nations December 7, 2015 | -- In the wake of last week’s terrorist attack in San Bernardino, California, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) says the United States should shift its focus away from bulk data collection and simply stop all immigration from "high risk" countries to prevent future attacks. Related: We Need to Fix Tourist Visa Security Gap December 7, 2015 – Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, told “Fox News Sunday” that Tuesday Congress will vote on a bill to tighten restrictions on the visa waiver program, pointing out that the Paris attackers had French or European passports and would not have had to get a visa before coming to the U.S.
We got no way of trackin' the ones we already got... Homeland Security Chair: 'We Don't Have the Ability to Monitor' the 2000 Syrian Refugees Already Here December 9, 2015 | Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, says the Obama administration is "playing Russian Roulette with national security" by bringing thousands of Syrian refugees into the country.
Granny says, "Dat's right - dem refugees is a trojan horse... Fears Growing Islamic State Successfully Weaponizing Refugees December 24, 2016 | WASHINGTON Western security officials are increasingly worried that the Islamic State terror group may be a step ahead of their renewed efforts to stop terrorist infiltration of their countries.
Just as we suspected... Syria's Assad: Some refugees are terrorists 2/10/17 - While President Donald Trump’s executive order banning Syrian refugees from entering the U.S. has been controversial around the world, it has the endorsement of at least one foreign leader: Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
I realize you think your posts are interesting, but they are annoying due to a number of things: 1) You use a man's name 2) You pretend to be a grandma 3) You avatar is a monkey 4) The posts aren't in any serious format... sometimes not even in English most understand. Nobody responds. What does that tell you? With me, the people are afraid to even attempt to try and answer a question. With you, it's annoying to try and read your posts. Try being serious and you should get some feedback. - - - Updated - - - I realize you think your posts are interesting, but they are annoying due to a number of things: 1) You use a man's name 2) You pretend to be a grandma 3) You avatar is a monkey 4) The posts aren't in any serious format... sometimes not even in English most understand. Nobody responds. What does that tell you? With me, the people are afraid to even attempt to try and answer a question. With you, it's annoying to try and read your posts. Try being serious and you should get some feedback.
Granny says... ... dat's okay... ... s'long as she gets her 2 cents in... ... `sides dat... ... ya fergot possum... ... an' Uncle Ferd.
I agree. These days, Muslims are great people because they're embracing their culture and religion, while Christian Europeans are evil for doing the same. Total lunacy. Sweden is already almost a 100% Islamic state. Such a great country with rich history is going down the drain. We are witnessing the downfall of Europe, the West in particular. Once a global power, now a messy shi*thole. Sad.
I just don't understand the American people. WTF? The Muslims have said they will convert or kill us. Some say, well it's not all Muslims. Well Hell folks. Ninety nine percent of the people in the Ku Klux Klan will not harm you, but the government does not allow even ONE of them to operate freely in this country. Besides, why do so many people care so much about the rights of foreigners that have NOTHING in common with our culture? I do think there is a side reason. Most of us are not committed to the constitutional principles our forefathers fought bled and died for. Most of us are fretting over the Muslims, but we have no real culture left here. We are trying to be everything to everybody and have ended up being nothing.
WTF kind of stupidity is that? Are the whites in this country not imprisoned enough? And is it abject stupidity like that statement that isn't responsible? Screw you and I don't care if the mods like it or not. I've fought more wars for the whites than anyone on this board. To claim I advocated such a proposition is a lie and one only that took a lack of courage to say the way you did.
I'm sure Assad is right.(After all, didn't he release them from prison when this first kicked off?) But I don't see him suggesting the refugees that the US are accepting are potential terrorists The outflow from Syria is going un-vetted into Europe by land and sea. Inflow to the USA is not really possible without being vetted, as they can't make the journey themselves to bypass border control. However, Assad's note of support for Trump's gambit makes it easier for him to retain his position in the post-conflict Syria.
I'm afraid it was yourself that drew the equivalence between Islamic terrorism and the KKK. The KKK are white Christians. It naturally follows from your position in relation to Muslims that we can only protect ourselves from the KKK by imprisoning all white Christians.
I'm against the POLICE STATE under any pretext. Whites in this country have no Rights. Okay, in this silly ass Internet world, because I acknowledge what the powers that be enforce, I'm for it, right? Did it dawn on all these beaming paragons of human virtue that just because someone acknowledges the way things are that they agree with them? That is the basis of 90 percent plus attacks that I get. Well, if you didn't understand what I said, stay on the Net. All the talk will save you. I know the whites are the enemies of the government - the terrorists sure as hell aren't.
We are all against police states, until we need the police! If you wanted to contain Muslims in some way because some of them could be a security threat, you would actually require the apparatus of a police state to do that. So if you are against a police state, then you will have to be more lenient on Muslims. Having said that, there is a political risk that Muslims will vote for more freedom-restrictive laws in accordance with their faith. This might be best challenged through debate and I don't agree that they have no rights, but I do acknowledge that white heterosexual males in particular have inferior rights in law and inn many social situations. This imbalance is a result of corrective measures to account for previous legal and social advantages. However, it is in my view an out-dated re-balance that seems to be, thankfully, beginning to be redressed.
The United States is under no obligation to allow any group into America when such group poses a National Security threat to the United States. With the immigration debacle, the government is mixing differing concepts into the same pie and confusing the people - that and the anti-immigrant lobby is the dumbest group of Americans in history. Immigration = citizenship. Therefore, that word is insufficient to describe the situation we have. We have a country giving citizenship to a million people a year. What is needed is a country that allows people to come here, do business, but NOT BECOME CITIZENS. In the case of Muslims, their religion is antithetical to the principles of our Constitution. America cannot be everything to everybody. For the balance of foreigners, we have to identify exactly what it is we are trying to address and use the appropriate tools. Is the issue a criminal issue? Is it an civil immigration issue? Is it a trade / business issue? Is it a National Security issue? The political hacks don't care; however, it is imperative to our Freedom and Liberty that each set of circumstances be addressed by the appropriate powers.
Sounds good to me So you are saying that Islamic belief is itself a National Security threat? That would work legally if it could be substantiated, and already applies to extremists. But much more difficult to substantiate across so many individuals.
Since I don't have a definitive answer, Trump's frustration made he utter the ultimate solution: Shut down the border until we figure out what the hell is going on. That move would force the legislators to respond to the problem, debate it, discuss it, and do something in short order. If they just tried to throw something together, Trump could veto it and if Congress over-rode the veto and did not solve the problem, they could answer for it in the mid terms.