They are starting from a position of bias. They are racist and have no credibility. Got something done as a real study by an independent group? I bet not.
The reality is that the bottom 50 nations of ahuman development index are almost exclusively black, and the top 50 nations are almost exclusively white and yellow. Additionally, blacks in every white nation are the lowest ranking group in terms of income, education, employment and highest in imprisonment; Northeast Asians in white majority nations are typically above whites in these categories. Please name just one variable which could account for blacks on the bottom of a human development hierarchy and yellows and whites at the top?
That has nothing to do with the article showing blacks and Hispanics are net deficits, and your claim that a belief/bias makes your claims untrustworthy is asinine as any author rejecting racial differences should therefore be dismissed out of hand. - - - Updated - - - But that's irrelevant. There's no evidence of hybrid dynamism of biracial black and white children.
Anybody making a claim that starts out with the end result and tries to make data fit it is at the outset dismissed. You link claims that there are genetic reasons for intelligence, based on what? Biased information? What genetics specifically point to lower intelligence among certain groups? Quit fancy footing and prove the website is true that genetics is the reason.
They stated their belief in the mission statement of the site, which is a nice red herring since it's completely irrelevant to the article I posted. The article I linked doesn't claim whites have naturally higher IQ. You can read numerous other articles on the site which support their position. You're going off topic after I posted an article you seem unable to address. The facts are that blacks and Hispanics are net deficits in the United States, and whites are net surpluses carrying blacks and Hispanics.
Nor do I intend on addressing it. You can't prove what they claim that genetics makes up intelligence. They have no credibility, and the fact you keep referring to the biased website, means you are going there in credibility also. Prove your claim from something that isn't out to get blacks and hispanics based on skin color, or as they try to claim, genetics. The article you posted is from this racist, biased website.
I thinks Racism is better and smarter than Nazi but I likes Nazi more. And does not hating Negro and Muslims. Respect I have with them. I'm not hating negro of a communist who do not want to I'm Nazi and no ace. He thinks I should have ace the Finns. When I'm a Nazi. They want to check me. - - - Updated - - - A little Finns humanity. - - - Updated - - - He was checking my hatred is far from communists want to take other peoples. - - - Updated - - - Nazi life prefer begun far from the restistence.
Government corruption and history. I guarantee that those same nations at the top of the development index have less government corruption and are also at relative peace i.e. no conflicts. Also if you're site has an FAQ that goes into detail about how they may or may not be racist and need a lengthy description for it, then it might be racist, not that it bothers them apparently.
So is it a culture of corruption? Why do Northeast Asians outperform whites in the UK, but blacks have significantly higher crime and unemployment rates? - - - Updated - - - Could you give an example of blsck-white biracial children being better than either their black and white racial averages?
Racial differences aren't based on skin color otherwise albino negros would be white caucasian; this is a red herring as my article is not about racial differences in IQ. The article shows blacks and Hispanics are net fiscal deficits in the US unlike whites. Do you have any objection or countervailing evidence to the article?
As I said, note that those higher-up countries have little corruption and relative peace. By comparison, those other African nations have tons of corruption and some form of internal conflict, terrorism, political strife or war occurring. Same with those in the Middle East.
I don't know. Never got past the part of them being a racist website. They have no credibility. No reason to read something from a site that has ZERO credibility. They are biased in anything they write. Got something objective? I asked you this before. If not, drop it. I won't address your biased source for untruths they tell.
No...But that's not an example of hybrid vigor. Hybrid vigor would mean the average biracial child is above the average of either race.
All sources are biased. Your decision to pick and choose which bias to reject out of hand is a bias. What untruths has the site spread? - - - Updated - - - All sources are biased. Your decision to pick and choose which bias to reject out of hand is a bias. What untruths has the site spread?
Genetics are responsible for intelligence. I think you'll need to contact the author's at the website or start another thread on this specific question. Do you accept blacks and Hispanics are net deficits in the US?
Yep, just genetics and nothing else. Not education, health, environment or anything else, just genetics
Racists have very low self esteem: https://compassioncoach.com/blog/racism-and-low-self-esteem We see a lot of that here on PF. There are many articles online which confirm this truth.
Got any evidence that isn't from a racist site to show this? So to answer your question, No, not at this time.
The vast majority of racism in America 8snt coming from whites. It's coming from blacks. But the left only cares about white racism. Hypocrisy at its worst.
I believe I am the OP of that thread and you have no grounds to accuse me for being racist. A completely out of the blue accusation.