From https://westernrifleshooters.wordpress.com/ Im confused. Are you confused? Are they confused? Is our Media confused? Are our Politicians confused? IF WE COULD JUST FIGURE OUT WHOS CAUSING THE PROBLEM Lets see do I understand this thing correctly? The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim The Beltway Snipers were Muslims The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim The underwear Bomber was a Muslim The U.S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims The Bafi Nightclub Bombers were Muslims The London Subway Bombers were Muslims The Moscow Theater Attackers were Muslims The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were Muslims The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims The Kenyan U.S, Embassy Bombers were Muslims The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were Muslims The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims The first World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims The Bombay & Mumbai India Attackers were Muslims The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims *** THINK OF IT: *** Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem Hindus living with Christians = No Problem Hindus living with Jews = No Problem Christians living with Shintos = No Problem Shintos living with Confucians = No Problem Confucians living with Bahais = No Problem Bahais living with Jews = No Problem Jews living with Atheists = No Problem Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem Hindus living with Bahais = No Problem Bahais living with Christians = No Problem Christians living with Jews = No Problem Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem Buddhists living with Shintos = No Problem Shintos living with Atheists = No Problem Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem Confusians living with Hindus = No Problem ***WHEREAS*** Muslims living with Hindus = Problem Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem Muslims living with Christians = Problem Muslims living with Jews = Problem Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem Muslims living with Bahais = Problem Muslims living with Shintos = Problem Muslims living with Atheists = Problem MUSLIMS LIVING WITH MUSLIMS = BIG PROBLEM *** SO THIS LEADS TO: *** Theyre not happy in Gaza Theyre not happy in Egypt Theyre not happy in Libya Theyre not happy in Morocco Theyre not happy in Iran Theyre not happy in Iraq Theyre not happy in Yemen Theyre not happy in Afghanistan Theyre not happy in Pakistan Theyre not happy in Syria Theyre not happy in Lebanon Theyre not happy in Nigeria Theyre not happy in Kenya Theyre not happy in Sudan *** SO, WHERE ARE THEY HAPPY? *** Theyre happy in Australia Theyre happy in England Theyre happy in Belgium Theyre happy in France Theyre happy in Italy Theyre happy in Germany Theyre happy in Sweden Theyre happy in the USA & Canada Theyre happy in Norway & India Theyre happy in almost every country that is not Islamic! And who do they blame? Not Islam. Not their leadership. Not themselves. THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN!! AND THEY WANT TO CHANGE THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN, TO BE LIKE THE COUNTRIES THEY CAME FROM, WHERE THEY WERE UNHAPPY! Im completely stumped Any idea who might be causing the problem? The protesters say its Trump.
Tatars are Muslims, and live peacefully in loyalty to countries they reside in Eastern Europe. (Today at least)
The Tartars are not loyal in Crimea. I have no particular problems with the muslim faith. It has it's share of issues as do all faiths. I don't look at them and think they are any better or worse than all the others. Just more of the same.
well its my understanding that the method to spread Islam is war, as did the prophet of Islam Muhammad did and taught his followers to do. hence peaceful coexistence isn't in the Muslim psyche. thing is you are correct, these people will expect to live as they please and their pleasure to eliminate anyone not like themselves. Islam leaders have openly admitted to admiring people like Hitler, because Islam has been the standard for such thinking long before there was such a thing as Nazism.
WTF does western rifle shooters know about anything other than shooting rifles? But to answer the flame bait OP, ignorance. From all sides.
Well, Hindus living with Christians: East India Company, Christians with Chinese religions, Boxar rebellion, Hindus with Hindus, Tamil Tigers, Christians with Christians, ohmygod where to begin, IRA, 30 years war a.s.o., a.s.o. Christians with Jews, Holocaust, Inquisition Atheists with Christians, Gulag, Buddhism and Chinese, Tibet, Jews and Sikhs (and many other combinations), uh, what? Where do you look to see what happens there? Most religions have battled against other versions of themselves, as well as most close-by religions. Jews, Baha'is, Sikhs, Atheists and Confucians haven't interacted with that many other religions on any particularly interesting scale. Islam does happen to be geographically close to a lot of religions. Of course, I'm not blaming Christianity or Hindus or whatnot for the above, I'm just saying war between close by nations isn't exactly rare. But sure, nobody is claiming that ISIS or the 9/11 people aren't problematic. The question is what to do about it. Turns out making war unto other religions doesn't do that much to suppress them, and in fact just gives their recruiters more fodder. Triple Entente tries to suppress Germany after WWI? Germany holds a grudge and strikes back as soon as they're back on their feet. 9/11 bombers want to punish western involvement in middle east? US invades middle east in response. US goes to war against Iraq and Afghanistan? Some muslims start fearing for their lives and start ISIS in response. This isn't about who's the problem, it's about how to deal with it. Turns out branding oneself as fundamental enemies of others does very little in terms of easing problems.
Well Islam, much like any other religion, is not a problem. It's the interpretation of it from the followers.
Typical response from the "progressive" peanut gallery, you can't refute the argument so you try to distract to the messenger. - - - Updated - - - Then communism is not a bad system, its just that its never been "interpreted" properly? At some point, when its been failure after failure after failure, you can't blame the "interpretation" of the system. You have to blame the system itself.
I have no problems with how Kuwait runs their Islamic society. They also take a very strong stance against extremists.
I notice you could not enlighten us on how western rifle shooters has any relevance to the topic. But have to instead engage in a personal attack. We'll take that as, they have no relevance and you can't give them relevance. They are just trolling and trolls fall for it. - - - Updated - - - Christianity had their own bad millenium. AKA, the dark ages.
Typical response from the "progressive" peanut gallery, you can't refute the argument so you try to distract to the messenger.
https://westernrifleshooters.wordpress.com/about/ Now I see why you can't give them credibility on the topic. They have no credibility about anything. Typical of trolling sites. You belong to this group?
[pruh-gres-iv] Spell Syllables Synonyms Examples Word Origin See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com adjective 1. favoring or advocating progress, change, improvement, or reform, as opposed to wishing to maintain things as they are, especially in political matters: a progressive mayor. 2. making progress toward better conditions; employing or advocating more enlightened or liberal ideas, new or experimental methods, etc.: a progressive community. 3. characterized by such progress, or by continuous improvement. 4. (initial capital letter) of or relating to any of the Progressive parties in politics. 5. going forward or onward; passing successively from one member of a series to the next; proceeding step by step. 6. noting or pertaining to a form of taxation in which the rate increases with certain increases in taxable income. 7. of or relating to progressive education :
I don't care what the group is about, their web site posted an interesting and insightful opinion, and I shared it. And that's the difference between a conservative and a "progressive" - conservatives can look at the content of a persons character and can recognize value, while "progressives" can only see skin deep.
You left out the definition of "progressive" as a noun - a person who thinks they are superior to all other people, who has no respect or tolerance for differing opinions and people, and who wants to control everyone else.
I disagree. And judging by the amount of response this is getting others seem to as well. It was not interesting or insightful. Just a uninformed hack job. And you've offered nothing to substantiate their illinformed opinion as valid. What character does this hack job website have? - - - Updated - - - Maybe you can link me to that definition? That sounds like the typical far RW nutter definition.
Have you noticed that all your posts have nothing to do with the subject of this OP? All you have written is attacks on the messenger, and nothing about the message. Yes, typical response from the "progressive" peanut gallery, you can't refute the argument so you try to distract to the messenger. That approach got you President Trump.
Have you noticed nobody has responded? I have not attacked you 1 time, just the very horrible website. Yet every one of your posts to me have been personal. But that is no surprise. I've asked several times why anyone should give your link credibility. And your response is to personally attempt to attack me. Good, I preferred trump over hilary.
The problem with islam goes back to its founder. Not a Christ like or Buddha like figure. It was created as the blood ran, and people died and that has been its history, waxing and waning, but never going away. Christianity could be reformed because the religion was not following the teachings of Christ, its founder. So reforming was easier, by just moving back to what he told people to do. Mohammed told people what to do as well. And the religion, especially in the middle east reflects this. Why make it more complicated than it is? Generally the apologists complicate it, to detract from the simple facts. Mohammed was such a lucky guy. For god chose him to be the end all when it came to this monotheistic god of the Jews. So what mohammed says corrects the record, and puts mohammed on top, and his religion is the only true one. God showed the arabs the jews were not the chosen people, mohammed and his arab army was. Cause god told him. And unlike Christ who taught the golden rule, who was not a conquerer, mohammed returned to war and spreading islam by the sword. Clearly this religion is the sort the liar, the Satan would create to fool people into thinking they were doing good when they were doing his will instead. It is closer to the religion of the Aztecs than to other religions. Not in its rituals or beliefs but in its primitive brutality and attitudes towards others.
It's more appropriate to compare and contrast Mohammed to Moses than it is to compare Mohammed to Jesus. Mohammed and Moses could be twins. They were both lunatics and homicidal maniacs. The main difference between them was that Mohammed wasn't as racist as Moses was. He was willing to accept anyone into his group if they accepted his fairy tale. Moses, on the other hand, wanted to exclude everyone who wasn't a member of his clannish ethnocentric group. He was racist to the bone and had no interest in recruiting other groups into his fairy tale. Both Moses and Mohammed claimed to have had a direct line to their deity and were eager to kill anyone who said otherwise. They both generated a ton of rules that everyone had to follow on penalty of death. It's a good thing they both didn't exist at the same time.
They probably understand the Koran more along the line explained here...... http://www.templemount.org/quranland.html Subject: by Shaykh Prof. Abdul Hadi Palazzi The Qur'an and the Land of Israel