Coal mining begins seeing revival as Trump gives industry hope

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by zbr6, Mar 1, 2017.

  1. zbr6

    zbr6 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    12,880
    Likes Received:
    7,355
    Trophy Points:
    113
    President Trump is delivering on his promises to provide energy for America and create jobs by rolling back the long, long, list of anti-business anti-prosperity regulations introduced by Obama which were designed to cripple the coal industry and by extension the American energy sector.

    Bravo, well done, keep it up.

    MAGA
     
  2. Brewskier

    Brewskier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2011
    Messages:
    48,910
    Likes Received:
    9,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Good stuff. Keep on hammering away at those retarded policies that Obama designed specifically to harm the economy.
     
  3. Just_a_Citizen

    Just_a_Citizen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2016
    Messages:
    9,298
    Likes Received:
    4,133
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm a firm believer in us exploiting every energy resource we have.... Safely...

    Jobs, & striving for energy independence baby!
     
  4. Sampson Simpon

    Sampson Simpon Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2017
    Messages:
    455
    Likes Received:
    206
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    polluting water for a handful of people to have a garbage job that basically kills them, for a completely obsolete and dirty technology. Man, right winger are not smart at all. No wonder why these people are struggling, they refuse to adapt
     
    Blueneck likes this.
  5. Homer J Thompson

    Homer J Thompson Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    2,583
    Likes Received:
    1,901
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That makes a lot of sense. They should get on welfare so they can live in ghettoes, suck from the taxpayer teet, never have a future other than what some rich elitist regressive decides is best for them. Maybe even have a few extra kids to stack up the welfare payments. I mean after all coal is obsolete, no one even uses that stuff anymore. Even better, why not stop using electricity and go back to candles, piping is so evil start using outhouses again... Hell, caves are stronger than houses and cheaper...
     
  6. VietVet

    VietVet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2017
    Messages:
    4,198
    Likes Received:
    4,859
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    ABSOLUTELY!
    Who needs that Damn EPA with their sissy concern for air you can breathe and water you can drink?
    The Damn EPA was brought about by that pinko liberal.................Nixon!

    Sure, the future lies with coal? :eyepopping:
     
  7. Cubed

    Cubed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    17,968
    Likes Received:
    4,954
    Trophy Points:
    113
    bahahaha
    The era of coal as a sustainable job facilitator is over and done with. You can blame Fracking and the price of Natural Gas for that one.
     
  8. Just_a_Citizen

    Just_a_Citizen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2016
    Messages:
    9,298
    Likes Received:
    4,133
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Fracking, now THERE's a method of energy production w/o any type of serious ecological concerns.

    Nope, not a one.
     
  9. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    16,925
    Likes Received:
    13,464
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    No doubt. When are we going to bring back those buggy whip maker jobs?

    Besides, I don't think requiring companies clean up after themselves to be an unnecessary burden.
     
  10. Steady Pie

    Steady Pie Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Messages:
    24,509
    Likes Received:
    7,250
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Looks like someone is experiencing cognitive dissonance over the inevitability of Communism and the workers revolution. Turns out the workers don't want what you're selling, go figure.
     
    lemmiwinx likes this.
  11. Cubed

    Cubed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    17,968
    Likes Received:
    4,954
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh it has it's own issues (though not nearly the ones that Coal has), mostly due to bad workers on the cement casing side, and minor earthquakes (the biggest issue IMO), but comparative to Coal, it's positively green.

    The local switch-board operators union will definitely have something to say ;)

    And no, it isn't, but tell that to the companies who have to pay for it.
     
  12. lemmiwinx

    lemmiwinx Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2016
    Messages:
    8,069
    Likes Received:
    5,430
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Cognitive dissonance lol! That's Bill Nye's term for when you realize scientists are fudging data to get a desired result.
     
  13. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    16,925
    Likes Received:
    13,464
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    This is the confusing part. You say socialism around a Republican and they go ape (*)(*)(*)(*), unless it involves socializing the cost of doing business. Then, it's all good. This is who we are, now. Taxpayers help businesses pay to create & sell their product and they keep the profits. Sweet deal. I want some of that gravy.

    Don't want to pay your labor force? No worries, tax payers will give your workers food stamps.
    Don't want to clean up your mess? No worries, who needs clean water, anyway?

    :evil:
     
  14. Cubed

    Cubed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    17,968
    Likes Received:
    4,954
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Socialize Losses, Privatize Profits. Great work if your big enough to get it.
     
    Blueneck likes this.
  15. zbr6

    zbr6 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    12,880
    Likes Received:
    7,355
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Haha.

    Backwards into regress!!!!
     
  16. zbr6

    zbr6 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    12,880
    Likes Received:
    7,355
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But guys don't forget that the alternative here, according to what we've seen from the Left, was to dump billions of tax payer dollars into junk "green technology" companies owned by people friendly to the Obama Administration for which we did not get a single usable product or advancement.

    How did that happen?
     
  17. Cubed

    Cubed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    17,968
    Likes Received:
    4,954
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Except that your almost entirely wrong about that. Yes a couple of funded companies went under, but the advancements in green tech have been leaps and bounds. Solar Panel prices are the lowest they've ever been and dropping, self driving cars are getting better and cheaper, battery advancements are slow, but consistent. Countries are powering their infrastructure with green tech more and more everyday (Germany gets closer and closer to a full day of green fuel, while other countries are doing the same if better)

    There is an entirely new economic sector that is springing up around us. Every major country is investing billions into green tech.

    I mean, i know it's not going to be a full switch-over anytime soon, but it's only on an upward trajectory.
     
    Blueneck likes this.
  18. Just_a_Citizen

    Just_a_Citizen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2016
    Messages:
    9,298
    Likes Received:
    4,133
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    An argument can be made that with technological improvements, coal can be as safe as fracking is all I'm getting at.
     
  19. Ericb760

    Ericb760 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2015
    Messages:
    5,165
    Likes Received:
    2,549
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Those "billions" are far outnumbered by the tax revenue on the more than $32 BILLION that has been loaned to companies like Tesla, which paid back back it's $465 MILLION loan NINE YEARS EARLY:

    https://www.energy.gov/lpo/tesla

    As of September, 2015, nearly $1 BILLION in interest has already been re-payed, and an additional $5 BILLION is projected over the next decade.

    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/obama-has-done-more-for-clean-energy-than-you-think/

    "Still, the loan program is not what it once was, helping to turbocharge a clean-energy economy. But it did seed the ground for an energy revolution with some 30 major projects so far, 20 of which are already producing clean power or churning out clean vehicles. All that is left to fight about is the speed at which clean energy will grow.
    As of September, 2015, nearly $1 BILLION in iterest has already been re-payed, and an additional $5 BILLION is projected over the next decade. "

    You can continue to s@!t all over renewable energy. That won't make coal come roaring back as a usable energy source. That horse has left the barn. Get over it.
     
  20. Cubed

    Cubed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    17,968
    Likes Received:
    4,954
    Trophy Points:
    113
    True. But most of the technological improvements usually mean automation which doesn't really employ the same level of humans as previous.
     
  21. liberalminority

    liberalminority Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Messages:
    25,273
    Likes Received:
    1,633
    Trophy Points:
    113
    taxing robots to pay for the welfare of unemployed people will not work because the people want to labor at something instead of sitting idle.

    in this case coal is coming back pollution and all, though investments in infrastructure can help handle the extra winds and storms.

    this could inspire innovation and job creation for managing weather related global warming events from pollution.
     
  22. Just_a_Citizen

    Just_a_Citizen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2016
    Messages:
    9,298
    Likes Received:
    4,133
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yet it helps eliminate potential dangers, increases output, & would allow related industries to employ more...
    Not to mention the potential for cheaper energy costs consumer side, which provides additional boosts to the economy.
     
  23. Cubed

    Cubed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    17,968
    Likes Received:
    4,954
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Which is great and all, but not many robots get taxed these days. And coal isn't coming back to where it was. It's simply not cost effective enough. It won't go away entirely due to its requirements for metallurgy, but it's days as a driving force for the middle-class is over.

    Yes, but again, if it's more economical to get the energy from other sources, that's where they will go. And are going.
     
  24. PARTIZAN1

    PARTIZAN1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2015
    Messages:
    46,850
    Likes Received:
    18,965
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The coal industry responds to demand for coal in order to ramp up production. Do you have facts on the increase in demand for coal since it had dropped over the years?
     
  25. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    79,149
    Likes Received:
    19,992
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Um, wait, how can they blame obama if this is true?

    Oh, I bet he allowed fracking.
     

Share This Page