If I can cite where in the majority opinion Heller says an example of a gun control law they would allow.....will you come on here and admit you are wrong?
You and I will burn up posts because, I suspect based on your recent posts you will not understand the scope and ruling and what was not part of the ruling. Below is the actual text of Heller and D.C. Minus Scalia's Obiter Dictum. Give it a shot, What was the limited scope presented and the ruling and what was not addressed as part of the ruling? What was discussion/rational vs the ruling. I can already predict your comment and it will open an interpretation you won't like. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/07-290.pdf By the way, the scope was very limited and acknowledged in the discussion that Heller vs D.C. Wasn't an indepth analysis of the scope of the second amendment (beyond the arguements for the ruling).
Look this is simple. If you have nothing to lose then agree to terms. You seem down right terrified. And you should be
That is simply untrue. That is like saying no traffic law could have ever prevented "that accident" when traffic laws prevent accidents every day.
