Sanctioned Russian Bank Confirms Executives Met with Trump Son-In-Law Jared Kushner

Hillary Clinton is irrelevant to the topic of this thread. If you want to make a topic about the Democratic Party hypocrisy as it relates to dealing with Russia, then you are free to do such. But first, do me a favor and tell me how many departments signed off on the authorization regarding the Uranium deal.

 

I guess some people are too dumb to see the irony in their own admonishment of other people.

I'm not talking about you, of course, just some people. I mean it's not like EVERYONE whose lips are stained orange are idiots.

 

I think you have serious psychological issues.

Edit- Trump is your President

 

According to whom? Certainly not the NSA, the FBI, the CIA, the head of the DNI, the 13 other intelligence agencies, multiple Republican Senators, Republican Congressmen, and - begrudgingly - the President himself.

 

Shouldn't that be Russias "alleged" interference? Or did they actually, finally prove such a thing happened?

 

Yes, they did. A long time ago.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ence-agencies-russia-behind-hacking/92514592/

 

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ence-agencies-russia-behind-hacking/92514592/
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive...sia-hacking-report-intelligence-agencies.html

 

These agrencies present assumptions, assesments - not the facts and clear evidences. Otherwise - why there is problem with arresting Trump administration for treason?

 

Hmmm....
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...Ill-have-more-flexibility-after-election.html
Or.....
Bill Clinton bagged $500,000 for a Moscow speech paid for by a Kremlin-backed bank while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.
Or....
Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman’s Joule energy company bagged $35 million from Putin’s Rusnano.
Or.....
Clinton Foundation chatter with State Dept. on Uranium Deal with Russia.
Or.....
Hillary Clinton hid $2.35 million in secret donations from Ian Telfer, the head of Russia’s uranium company.

Seems somebody is on the take from Russia, and it's not Trump.

What was the interference and why did it help Trump?

They lie about things like landing under sniper fire. They forget meetings with the Russians because Russia is just 1 of many many nations our leaders meet with.

 

That looks like a link saying that 17 agencies believe Podestas email was hacked by the Russians....didn't see where it mentions they proved Russias Election interference. Did I miss it?

 

No. I refuse to accept that incompetent self-serving narcissistic moron as president.

Respect is earned and Trump has done nothing to earn my respect. If he wants me to be my president, then he should start acting like one.

 

Because proving that Russian interfered in the election with the express intent of helping Trump is not the same as proving that Trump knew about the hacking or colluded with Russian officials to perpetrate that hacking.

 

...are you trying to claim that hacking and releasing Podestas emails do not qualify as election interference?

 

I'm not trying to claim anything, I'm just not seeing what your OP claims as fact being a proven fact at all.
They should use the word "allegedly" until such a proven connection can be shown.


Curious though, would you care to list out the most damaging contents of the leak...errr hack...that would have changed the election? Which ones were the most damaging, and would qualify as election interference?

 

You can read the report here: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive...sia-hacking-report-intelligence-agencies.html

 

Which means, exactly, what..? Explain yourself.

 

WTF? The BS about 17 agencies is the one guy that heads them all and another liberal mistruth.

The NY times was just emotional thoughts from a democrat source posing as a news org.

You can't get much more desperate.

 

You used it's Bush's fault for 8 straight years. This is too much. Do you even hear yourself?

 

And why did the Russians hacking the DNC and releasing their emails help Trump?

baby steps....

 

This is not a court of law. There is no requirement of using the word "allegedly" especially when, as I have shown you, the conclusion of these intelligence agencies is that Russia did interfere with the election.

No, I am not going down this rabbit hole with you. The influence of Russian interference is very difficult to ascertain. For some, the repeated and widespread usage of fake news story, like Pizzagate, may have been most influential. For others, it may have been the widespread use of misinformation, like Clinton supposedly selling the Russians Uranium or Clinton supposedly being fired from her first job for being corrupt, could have been most influential. For others, it could have been the complete removal of privacy related to internal communications within the Clinton campaign that was most influential. For others, it could have been the widespread promotion of Trump related propaganda that was most influential.

 

You said you were done trolling.

Now leave.

 

Why did Jon (I like giant paintings of little kids in their underwear chained to walls) Podestas emails help Trump?

 

The NY Times is a link to the official report from the Director of the National Intelligence Agency. You can't get more official.

 

I got pulled back in and who are you the thread Nazi? Lmao. I'm going but only because I'm tired of showing how completely fake and disturbingly hypocritical the left are.

 

Because it was selectively released in that they did not release hacked information from the Republican campaign officials and because they timed the release to damage her campaign.

But hacking Podesta was not the extent of their interference.