Dr. Cyril Wecht Curriculum Vitae University of Pittsburgh (B.S.), (M.D.), (LLB) University of Maryland School of Law (J.D.) Listen, Pause And Reflect on Dr. Wecht's Brilliant Observations. [video=youtube;-muQL-QPKeM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-muQL-QPKeM[/video]
He owned nothing he merely replayed the same debunked and tired talking points. For example he cites the large majority who believe there was a conspiracy or who doubt the WC conclusions. Sorry but consensus is not evidence. Further most of those who doubt the WC have never read it but do believe many lies about it and yet resisting this means you. HE cites anecdotes to claim Dallas was a hate filled city which hated JFK and democrats. Anecdotes prove nothing of course and the ENORMOUS reception of JFK in Dallas proves a general lack of hatred city wide. The claim of Dallas being a city of hatred of catholics is a nonsensical assertion with no supporting evidence. HE repeats the long known removal of the body which is questionable but does not support or prove a conspiracy theory for the assassination. And on and on and on. The only ones owned here are conspiracy theorists who fall flat and fail epically to prove a conspiracy.
A top notch forensic pathologist like Wecht knows what a massive exit head wound looks like. The wound in the back of Kennedy's skull, which is an exit wound, instantly shuts down all other lying blather about Oswald and the Texas school book depository.and this and that. With an exit wound to the back of Kennedy's skull as proof of a frontal shot by some unidentified assassin there is the end of Oswald the lone killer on the sixth floor of the TSBD. There is no defense or counter to that demolition of the Warren Commission report. It's over!
No it does not shut down anything. The wound at the back of his head was caused by a bullet entering the back of the head from above and behind bursting the back of the skull open. Wecht stated opinion and nothing more and he had no opportunity to examine the wound first hand as the expert pathologists who conducted the autopsy did. There evidence destroys his opinion. It was over before he spoke and it is proven through evidence that Oswald acted alone.
http://jfkmurdersolved.com/images/headwoundsketch.jpg Wow! And you seem to know so much about the issue, too.
An artistic drawing which was not made from like is not evidence. The evidence proves you wrong and what a childishly silly attempt. http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/head.htm. There was no wound to the temple and in fact the bullet entered from above and behind. Simple fact your claim is debunked
Do I take the expertise and judgement of internationally famous forensic pathologists like Cyril Wecht over the paper pushing rank amateurs with NO experience in an autopsy used as stooges by all the generals at the sham autopsy inquest at Bethesda? Hell yes! Only a nut case and a clown would say otherwise.
The doctors at Bethesda were experienced expert pathologists and were not managed or controlled by anyone. The claim that they were inexperienced and managed is straight from the movie JFK and it is fiction like the rest of that film. Wecht is JUST as MUCH a paper pusher as the expert experienced pathologists at bethesda. Of course all doctors are paper pushers. It takes a ton of administrative work to practice any form of medicine. The difference is that the doctors at bethesda had direct access to the body and could examine it for evidence. Wecht did not. Only a fool would take his word over theirs.
Yes. Cyril Wecht is a world renowned expert in the field of forensic pathology and his opinion has much credibility and expertise behind it. The two instructors at Bethesda who had never never conducted an actual autopsy in their lives, certainly not one involving gun wounds... not so much. They found what the attending military men wanted them to find. Period!
Cyril Wecht is no more renowned than the OTHER pathologists and experts who testified with him before the HSCA. They all signed off on the original autopsy and it's evidence. He is also no more expert or experienced than the doctors at bethesda. They were in fact experts experienced pathologists with a history of determining cause of death and examining violent death to include gun shot deaths. Yes there were three Doctors involved in the JFk autopsy at Bethesda not 2 and they all had years of experience conducting autopsies including autopsies on gun shot victims. The claim they did not is a line of fiction from the movie JFK. Attending military men means nothing as the expert pathologists themselves were military men and under no ones management. The claim that they were managed by other officers is another baseless lie from the movie JFK. Those experts at bethesda had direct evidence which wecht did not which is why the vast majority of doctors agree with them and it was a legitimate sound autopsy with evidence proving you wrong.
"The ARRB sought additional witnesses in an attempt to compile a more complete record of the autopsy on Kennedy. In July 1998, a staff report released by the ARRB emphasized shortcomings in the original autopsy. The ARRB wrote, "One of the many tragedies of the assassination of President Kennedy has been the incompleteness of the autopsy record and the suspicion caused by the shroud of secrecy that has surrounded the records that do exist." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_autopsy Humes and Boswell were the two incompetents that conducted the original autopsy under the watchful eye of Pentagon generals. Their claims are directly contradicted by all the experienced E.R. doctors that examined JFK's body when it was first brought into Parkland Hospital. The people that know provide facts. The fools that don't just make asses of themselves.
I see since my last visit here we have another paid shill other than the regular troll that has been trolling here for years the one that is from nazi germany.lol to join him now to join him in his trolling here in the JFK section.the CIA is worried about all these truth threads you create RS the fact they have one here regulary they have been paying for years and another one that recently joined him.lol
Wrong. it was an expert autopsy unsupervised by anyone outside of the actual doctors who were experienced experts. Few real doctors have challenged the findings even if some claim some minor errors were made. The autopsy defeats and trumps the parkland doctors who were ER doctors and not pathologists and who did not examine the head other than for life saving measures.
They are not creating truth threads they are embarrassing themselves with conspiracy crap as you always did
I see some nonsense about no entrance wound in the front of Kennedy's head. Neither is there an EXIT wound. From a weapon that supposedly just put a bullet through Kennedy's back, out his throat (clipping a vertebra), into Connoly's back, taking out several inches of rib bone EXITS his chest and goes THROUGH his wrist (hitting more bone) and into his thigh...all without noticeable deformity? You seem to miss the huge flap of scalp and bone flying up from the front right side of Kennedy's scalp in the Zapruder film. Could that have been an exit wound? Possibly but not from a bullet fired from the TBD
The entrance wound was in the back and the exit wound to the side the bullet cleaved a piece of his head off. That is proven in autopsy which no one can challenge or refute. The bullet you refer to was clearly and visibly deformed in a manner perfectly CONSISTENT with bullets doing such damage. The claim that it was pristine is a long debunked falsehood. In the Zapruder film that flap shot up from the side not the front and in fact no evidence of any kind whatsoever shows a bullet coming from anywhere other than the TSBD
That would be the deeply flawed autopsy. And gee...in order to have an exit wound that far to the side of his head...the shot couldn't come from the TBD. Ooops
Not deeply flawed at all a professional autopsy conducted by experts and it came from the TSBD it did not come from anywhere else. The exit and entrance wounds fell right into line with Oswald's position http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/head.htm
From the McAdam's link 44 of 46 Parkland and Bethesday witnesses saw a large defect in the "back" of Kennedy's head Which contradicts the autopsy