Sorry but I didn't start this thread 15 years ago and so far you haven't contributed anything to it other than post irrelevant off topic silliness. I also asked you to show the relevance of your post to this topic (if you could) and you failed to respond respectively and appropriately. I then asked you for your contribution to this discussion because you chose to participate, albeit with disingenuous intent. Are you afraid to do that because you can't disagree with any of the 29 facts listed and that has you terrified? Explain your purpose, if you have a genuine one.
I have read your list.. and I am not impressed in the least. The conspiracy would have had to more participants than a DeMille movie. The conspiracy worked because it was small, simple and closely held. I would question whether or not the muscle on board the aircraft ever knew it was a suicide mission. The pilots were trained and couldn't get their tickets because their English was poor and English is the language of international aviation.. You are trying to start with the minutia and work outward.. quoting a bunch of half baked Congressmen who don't know jack either. Then you have other self styled experts who have an agenda. Listen carefully.. I could have flown a plane into the towers.. so don't listen to the bozos. If you don't plan to recover from the maneuver, any average pilot could do it. You also have to remember that there had been many, many hijackings for ransom over the years, but they were NOT suicide missions... This one took our people by surprise. Didn't you know that morning that the towers would fall? I sat at my desk saying out loud to the first responders, "don't go into the buildings".. If you have studied the work of the architect... the configuration of the cantilevered floors off the core and the aluminum skin.. you would stop playing this silly game. The attack happened as reported. See ya....
Whether you're "impressed" or not is also irrelevant. Those are 29 facts about the 9/11 Commission and their report Any one of those facts renders the report a fraud. All of them render it a complete scam. That you haven't attempted to correct even one of them signifies you agree with all of them regardless of your feigned trivialization. The remainder of your post also has little to do with the 9/11 Commission, the 9/11 Commission Report or the list of 29 facts I posted about both. I will restrict my response to what I believe is appropriate to this discussion. There's nothing "minutia" about the 9/11 Commission or the 9/11 Commission Report. It is a major part of the official conspiracy theory. It is being peddled as fact and used as pretext to commit endless genocide for the benefit of the military industrial complex. It is central to the 9/11 event. Yes they are simply puppets in that grand scheme but that doesn't change any of the facts. Their quotes reveal the 9/11 Commission and their report for what it is, an elaborate scam. I don't know who in particular you're referring to. If getting at the truth is an agenda, then yes, I agree, I have the same agenda. There was no legitimate report as evidenced by this thread and since you agree with all 29 facts, you also agree that the 9/11 Commission and their report is illegitimate. You can't have it both ways. I understand your avoidance of the subject matter, it is what I believe it is and I posted (see next to last sentence).
You still cannot quote one error or falsehood in the report which destroys the rest of your efforts. This is why the twoofer movement has shrunken to a hilarious footnote in history and is the laughing stock of the nation as a whole
15 years ago I believed the official story. 5 years after that, I came to the disgusting conclusion that I had been completely deceived, because the facts contradicted the official story. Likely you will never have that epiphany.
Except no one can produce any such facts. You had no epiphany you merely enjoy conspiracy theory so much you allow your self to ignore facts and evidence and instead embrace any loopy story as truth. This is very cmmon for immature kids and weak thinkers which is who makes up the twoofer movement.
Margot has often claimed in her posts to have close ties to the Saudi royal family. The Bush administration not only covered up for the Saudi royal family by classifying the 28 pages but also allowed the Bin Laden family to leave the US 3 days after 9/11 with help from the FBI. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bin-laden-family-evacuated/ Philip Zelikow kept the 28 classified pages hidden from the 9/11 Commission and even fired an aide who wanted the 9/11 Commission to have access to those 28 pages. Because of her admitted close ties to the Saudi royal family (and the nature of all her posts in general with regard to 9/11) I doubt that Margot will ever honestly examine any evidence that contradicts the official 9/11 story. You're absolutely right.
Exactly, he knew the exact date and targets well in advance. Thanks for the reminder. 9/11 Family Member Patty Casazza: Government Knew Exact Date and Exact Targets http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/11/911-family-member-patty-casazza.html
It may be hilarious to you but that's called TREASON and complicity to mass murder and terrorism in the US, funny that eh?
I don't have any conspiracy theory. Do you understand the difference between fact and theory? For example, the 9/11 event was a conspiracy fact even if you believe the official fairy tale or you believe UFOs did 9/11. The 9/11 Commission Report is an unsupported and uninvestigated conspiracy theory, not a conspiracy fact even if you believe it's 100% accurate. The incontrovertible evidence shows it's not fact. What is the point of your question? Reminder, I'm not the subject of this thread.
It is supported by evidence and your claim to the contrary is a proven lie. It has been investigated unlike any of your claims. You STILL cannot quote one part which is false
What “facts” contradict the 9/11 Commission Report? We’re looking for a Fact that is indicates A and the REPORT (nothing else) saying B is the case.
All of them, below is just a sample, you know, the ones you agree with. Who is "we"? You mean YOU, you speak for no one but yourself. Given ANY one of the above listed facts, no one in his/her right mind could conclude the 9/11 Commission Report is anything more than a fraud.
Again, “We’re looking for a Fact that is indicates A and the REPORT (nothing else) saying B is the case.” Quote where the text of the report is wrong. You seem to have some problem knowing what to do at this point except to bring up your 29 opinions so I will define it for you… Quote— Cite the text of the report. Not anything else in the universe; just the text of the report. Text—Written words Wrong—Incorrect. Thanks in advance for your cooperation.
More than answered throughout this thread. You are still not a "we", didn't you learn anything in grade school grammar? What is the object of your game? You're welcome.
You still haven’t quoted the 9/11 Commission Report. Please do so in the future if you’re going to question the findings of the report.
Some of us are able to move beyond that point of what the Commission said, to what it all means, the so-called big picture. Naturally, some of us aren't.
You canot quote what it says and show how said quote is false. So you have not moved at all but instead ignored anything it says and leaped right into conspiracy theories without evidence
This thread needs to be bumped. There's an incredible amount of factual information here that requires constant exposure, especially for those who haven't studied them and are interested. If you haven't studied the evidence, you only know what you were told by the US government.
This thread also needs to be bumped. There's an incredible amount of factual information here that requires constant exposure, especially for those who haven't studied them and are interested. If you haven't studied the evidence, you only know what you were told by the US government.