Christians — have you been deceived?

Some groups of humans are descended from a completely separate species from "homo sapiens", so how can the mixed offspring be the same as homo sapiens?

 

Because they are still Homo Sapiens by definition. They are members of the same species.

 

How are they still homo sapiens by definition when they are mixed with non homo sapiens?

 

Is the problem that you don't know how science defines "species"?

If a dog had some wolf in its ancestry 100 generations ago, does that mean it isn't a dog?

 

lies.

Jews were already in Europe before Jesus was born, thanks to the Roman and Greek Empires. 10% of the Roman Empire was Jewish.

and considering that many folks in the northern Levant have light eyes, your other claims are also silly.

stop hating on the Jews

 

Bad analogy. All dogs have wolf ancestry. Not all humans have Neanderthal ancestry.

 

only Asians and Whites do.

I am 4% Neanderthal.

 

Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals have a common ancestry too.

And its not a bad analogy. If a dog has direct wolf lineage in its ancestry a hundred generations ago (even those dogs split off from wolves thousands of generations ago) does that make it not a dog?

 

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130116195333.htm

So, Ron, do you think Jesus had blue eyes?

 

Correct.

 

You can say the same thing about Chimpanzees and modern humans.

It's a bad analogy because all dogs have wolf genetics in them to varying degrees. With humans, some have Neanderthal DNA, which is another species from homo sapiens, while others do not. At best you can say some people are mostly homo sapien, with some other species mixed in.

 

probably not.

but its possible.

however, he surely did not have blond hair or light skin.

he likely had dark hair that was wavy/curly, dark eyes, and was very tan.

 

humans chimpanzees cannot breed.

blacks and whites can **** each other all day long, and make lots of very healthy babies who are very fertile.

 

So all we need is for white people to interbreed with Africans and then everyone will have the same DNA mix! Nice to see you encouraging miscegenation.

 

I agree. I think he looked a lot more like the 2nd picture than the Nordic European Jesus that many European people have internalized. I wonder, though, if they created this image of him in their mind themselves, or if they were sold that image.

 

That doesn't disprove my point about the "common ancestry" argument.

 

I'm not encouraging that at all. I'm not the Marxist trying to force a state of "equality" on the world. I encourage differences.

 

What value is there in humanity not all being part of the same species?

 

Considering the model for the modern conception of Jesus was Cesare Borgia, and he himself was a Catalan with mixed Southern European, Jewish, and Moorish ancestry, how exactly is that "Nordic"?

 

"Diversity".

 

He had Nordic features, which I already gave examples of. Whether he was mixed and still retained those features is irrelevant.

 

You seem very hung up on outside appearances.

 

That doesn't make any sense.

 

Humans are evolved that way. You can 'Marx' your way into thinking differently about it, but ultimately it's part of our nature.

 

Sure it does. I embrace the existence of real human diversity, whereas you encourage the blending of humanity into a nondescript brown blob of conformance (for political and ideological reasons).