NY Times "Reporter" Never Actually Saw the Comey Memo

What a beautiful example of your sad mantra :Every major negative news story about Trump is a lie. All major members of intelligence agencies who investigate Trump are liars. Only Mein Trumph tells the truth in the whole world. Your version of how democracy works.

 

There remains no evidence of Trump-Russia collusion

 

Read your post and you'll understand the person lieing is you. More than any president in history, what the heck you 12 and not followed politics. If your looking for an honest politician good luck. Never qualified, coming from you the one that has no clue what qualifies you to be president, quit trying to act like losing California is in anyway shape or form America, remind me again how many states did Hils when lol. Quit getting your talking points from msnbc and maybe somebody will take your trolls seriously.

 

According to Crooked Hillary and other leftist liars, all 17, all of them said that there was collusion with the Russians.

One problem, there are only 16 intelligence agencies that are part of the intelligence community and if half of them made such a claim, there were some serious laws broken.

I want the left to produce the documents from the Department of Energy OIC, the Office of Naval Intelligence, Marine Corps Intelligence, Coast Guard Intelligence and the Department of the Treasury OTFI where they said the Russians were trying to influence our elections.

I don't think the above intelligence agencies are allowed to be conducting these types of snoop and pooping operations.

Last Friday night Bill Maher even quoted Hillary again and the liberal MSM with the 17 intelligence agencies claim.

It's Democrat donkey crap. It's just another leftist lie.

I've watched most of the hearings in the House and in the Senate dealing with the Russians and the 2016 elections on C-Span and C-Span-2 and only four intelligence agencies have come out saying that the Russians were meddling in the elections and that it's nothing new, Russia has been doing it for over 50 years now.

 

lol what a waste of time. everything you say has no backup. And you've proven how impotent your post is by using labels like trolls. That's the first sign of deep ignorance. Your complete lack of knowledge about not only the lies and screw ups during Orange-Clown's administration which deservedly brought on a special counsel very early in his presidential carrier, but the voluminous lies he told going all the way back to 2011 when he told his followers about his earthshaking findings about Obama's birth certificate which he never revealed makes him the most amazing lying politician on this planet. I've followed Trump for years. I feel sorry for your complete ignorance about Trump's sociopath lies we'll just chalk it up to lack of experience.. There is no Democracy when a sociopath like Trump lies to both his opponents and followers alike. Lay of the Orange Cool-Aide..

 

Yes because their source agrees with their political POV. Heck in my experience most libs won't watch FOX, or listen to Rush or watch Hannity. They also put down Fox which is a largely liberal news outlet. That shows just how far gone to the left they really are.

I trust most of the MSM to be radical leftist biased. They are NOT objective by any means. I think every reporter should be made to divulge who they voted for that way, their bias could be taken into consideration.

 

Oh how authoritarian.
Meanwhile you follow the Trump playbook line for line. All major negative news against Trump is a lie. All major investigations against Trump are lies. Only Mein Trumph tells the truth

 

Way off topic. And you've already agreed that Trump is destroying our democracy by lying to everyone about all things domestic and foreign. I don't care about your ravings about Hillary Clinton. This is embarrassing. Seriously is there some kind of medication you should be taking?

 

When did demanding the truth become 'authoritarian?' I'd like to know the political affiliations of reporters that call themselves or imply they are 'objective.' Especially NPR and PBS where objectivity is supposed to be assumed but, if you actually listen or watch, it's obvious just how left-biased they are. How do I know that? Because I listen to talk radio and FOX news as well as the MSM. To deny these op ed and news sources is to deny reality. They offer an alternate view of the 'news' and, anyone with half a brain can see the MSM media bias. Also, the MSM reaches many more people because of long-established networks. Try actually availing yourself of sources that don't agree with you...I do. That's how I know that the MSM is not to be trusted. The days of Walter Cronkite are long gone...and even HE was a libby. Wake up!!

 

It's this kind of paranoid hysteria that leads to an authoritarian state and this unfortunately is the outgrowth of a Trump machine that brainwashes it's followers to believe that all major negative news stories and investigations against the regime are 100% lies without question.

Lol so now you are the final word on what's biased reporting and what isn't . And in your authoritarian zeal you have already labeled all MSM liberal 100%. This is why we can't find any truly unbiased individuals to tell us who is liberal or conservative. If you don't like freedom of the Press too bad. find somewhere else to live. . . Also Trump is the reason we need a strong press. He's the original creator of false news and alternative facts. You can't let a pathological lying president roam free with out checks.

 

What you have mostly demonstrated is your own extreme perspective. The MSM isn't "radical" anything. I'm not even sure how to respond to such a claim, because it is so detached from reality.

 

Comey is stuck. Lie, Die, or tell the damn truth.

 

Lol! I think this is more of you pushing your own wishful thinking.

 

You can't respond because you have not considered any other opinions/news. Here is an exercise for you....Take a MSM '
story' and research it across the internet. I bet most links you find are liberal. I believe you and others don't really realize just how radical leftist the media has become.

 

Lol you've already deemed that all MSM news is leftest so therefore in your paranoid zeal you would automatically label all of their sources leftist as well. Your sorry arguments are truly sophomoric and work to form a vicious circle. And notice not once do you question the continual lies and fake news coming out of the Orange-Feacus administration. Its' our strong press that is a great defense against an administration's mountain of lies against the American people. We cannot sustain a stable Democracy when a pathological liar of Trumps nature is allowed to roam free without strong checks on him. Thank god for a free press and woe to those authoritarians who seek to diminish it.

 

the memorandum was expropriated and inadmissible under the code of ethics in journalism.

therefore the recounted details from the anonymous source became sufficient for objective reporting.

 

does it even matter at this point if it is true or not? the damage to Trump is already done the NY Slime accomplished it is goal and if it is found out to be not true the NY Slime gets to play the victim of a bad anonymous source

 

how real news works or how it use to work the press didn't just use an anonymous sources as the only evidence for their article they would gather what is called collaborating evidence to verify what the source gave them so to give credibility to the information

I will give you an example
I call up your hometown newspaper and tell them as an anonymous source that you are a kleptomaniac? would it be ethical for the news paper then to create a article proclaiming you are a kleptomaniac just on the words of an anonymous source alone with out trying to find collaborating evidence that you are like maybe a police record of you shop lifting?

 

And you're doing your best to pretend that it doesn't.

There is little doubt that it does exist, and that you will see it before too much longer.

As the mountain of evidence and connections regarding Trump and the Russians continues to grow like a slowly erupting volcano, extreme right wingers turn up the shrill knob and the volume in denial.

This story is not going to go away. Wish and shout all you want. But it's not going away.

 

The goal of DNC propagandists is to shape public opinion not report the truth. DNC disinformation is what they print. One has to remember with these neoMarxists democrats it's party before your own children. It's support the party stance or be ran out of town.

 

Will you take part in the riots when the DNC conspiracy dies?

 

I'm still waiting to see this so called mountain of evidence anonymous sources isn't evidence, guilt by association isn't evidence, assumptions and speculations isn't evidence

 

Document your claim that the DNC has anything to do with the Russia investigations.

 

Where did all this originate? The DNC server. An anonymous high ranking democrat tells me it was cooked up in the basement of the DNC. They read the memo to me over the phone, so I didn't actually see it but trust me it's real.

So back to my original question will you personally take part in the riots or just encourage those that do?

 

Does he really need to re-hash the Crowdstrike / Steele dossier again? Now deny it wasn't the premise for the FISA warrant, and ... spin!