RUSSIA PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN WILL MEDIATE WITH NORTH KOREA

Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by trucker, May 27, 2017.

  1. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    what about testing his new toys military tech hardware out on us? seems like a nice proxy war to jump into ..
     
    Last edited: May 27, 2017
  2. 22catch

    22catch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2016
    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    2,209
    Trophy Points:
    113
    THAT is the first viable deterrent argument I've heard yet. So if you see or hear for any reason US troop movements moving away from the DMZ? It's coming.
     
  3. 22catch

    22catch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2016
    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    2,209
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You mean by supplying NK with these new toys? Doesn't apply. This isn't Syria where we are piddling around. It will be an onslaught. No war. No time. No infantry war or ground war at all. Propaganda will see to that from us and China.
     
  4. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    ok then here comes kims tanks and a blitz creg shock :salute: troops ~rolling across the DMZ then:truce:[​IMG]
    https://aw.my.com/us/news/general/north-korean-firepower
     
    Last edited: May 27, 2017
  5. 22catch

    22catch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2016
    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    2,209
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How well did Sadaams T-72s fair? Pretty sure he lost over 1,000. We lost zero. They look intimidating but they might as well be sitting in a golf cart shooting a water pistol.

    It was kind of sad but you can't be honorable in war. Those T-72s will be blinded. Just like Sadaams. Useless.
     
  6. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It will be a bigger disaster than the refugee crisis hitting the EU. You think China will wait till they get hit by this? They will not accept an attack on NK because of this and intervene. They have done so in the past.

    The dog in this fight, is American influence in North Korea. They will not stand for this. Besides, they also border NK, so millions could be heading their way too.

    Even Iraq was able to send missiles to Israel. NK is fully prepared and it's army is utterly and utterly massive. They will completely destroy Seoul.

    And the US is going to be blamed for this.
     
    Last edited: May 27, 2017
    trucker likes this.
  7. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Saddam had no air support yes the north korean have old planes ok but drones too with chemical agents spraying our troops, those us airbases in south korea better watch out and have there gas masked on..and look out for spies sleeper cells attacking it


     
  8. 22catch

    22catch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2016
    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    2,209
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sigh. China isn't going to stop anything. As soon as we attack if that action takes place they will be right there helping!

    We will be working with China as soon as KJU is captured or killed. China wants a stable leader there. We want the nukes gone.

    This isn't the Korean War. Different in every way. We have no intention of trying to unify the Koreas, that's all China cares about. We want the nukes gone. China can take them for all we care.

    Edit : Seoul destroyed? No. How? Only the Koksan artillery pieces can even reach Seoul and that's with specific munitions.

    It takes weeks of constant artillery bombardment to hurt a city. Now if NK could drop bombs yes. Artillery is ineffective.

    It's just not true.
     
    Last edited: May 27, 2017
  9. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    okeydokey sounds real good, but your forgetting the bigger picture if china wants to screw with us a little and play the art of war on us ..do a little back stabbing and twist that knife around a little.:omfg:
     
    Last edited: May 27, 2017
  10. 22catch

    22catch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2016
    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    2,209
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You could be right but critical thinking based on China's actions and communications since Xi visited Trump in South Florida says no and KJU threatening even them says no as well.

    To me China is thinking KJU has become a liability versus what the NK regime used to be for decades.. Which was a nice buffer they could control with mutual benefit since the Korean war to thwart US Imperialism.

    Now they are ready for a new leader to continue that. If Trump assures them we have no intention of threatening that set up? China wins. And we bear all the costs. A double win for China.
     
  11. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So far it's a total no. And it won't look like Trump is such a charming person to persuade them.

    Missiles with WMD's.
     
  12. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    ok what so you got that all button down in your mind;) with china what about putin he can feed kim all kinds of good mean toys over that railroad bridge..
     
    Last edited: May 27, 2017
    Sallyally likes this.
  13. Ninian

    Ninian Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2017
    Messages:
    3,902
    Likes Received:
    756
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I would rather assume that military of States will use nuclear weapons on the North Corea, or some other kind of weapon of mass destruction, albeit that will recquire NK being closer to posession of effective nuclear weaponry.
     
  14. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Sallyally likes this.
  15. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    yeah those pesky north korea farmers peasants have got to pay:eek: because i dont know they are slanted eye types..and they are way over there who frecken cares?:deadhorse:
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: May 27, 2017
  16. Ninian

    Ninian Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2017
    Messages:
    3,902
    Likes Received:
    756
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Federation will not be interested in arming North Korea. Federal military pretty much capable of testing their armaments in peaceful conditions, and albeit in operations in Syria been used the new tech, it was not sent there for a test, it was used because it is already incorporated in structure of our army. Unless Federation will be forced to get involved, for one or other reason - such as securing safety of people of Primirsky Krai and other federal states of Far East - there will be no federal military in North Korea, no russian equipment, and a very little interest in getting involved.
     
  17. Ninian

    Ninian Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2017
    Messages:
    3,902
    Likes Received:
    756
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They are a trading parthner, we trade with them. They are not part of Federation and likely to not receive military support in case of a war with States, even if government of North Korea will request it.

    What I mean is - Federation is certainly has no interest in a war next to yet another part of our border, but is not going to be involved in anything, but preventing or ending it.
     
  18. Ninian

    Ninian Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2017
    Messages:
    3,902
    Likes Received:
    756
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I never said that such act would be anything just or worthy. It would be an atrosity, a crime against principles we build our civilization on. I mean what I mean - I assume that if there will be use of force - likely it will be performed through that disgusting, devastating weaponry.
     
  19. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    but itsbest to test them in real war like situations to see if they preform under adverse conditions, just to be sure yah know, i test fire my ak 47 and sks with new scopes on it shooting it, see if it loosens up or gets off the target same thing.
     
  20. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    didnt stop us doing it on Hiroshima and Nagasaki japan ww#2 :eekeyes:
     
    Last edited: May 27, 2017
  21. 22catch

    22catch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2016
    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    2,209
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Again with China see my previous opinion. Trump and Xi came to some kind of understanding.

    Any missile fired will be shot down
     
  22. Ninian

    Ninian Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2017
    Messages:
    3,902
    Likes Received:
    756
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Any sort of adverse condition can be recreated in controlled environment, whithin the RF. The only thing the trial-by-battle shows is how accurate the tests were, and how people are capable of handling the real warfare.
     
    trucker likes this.
  23. 22catch

    22catch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2016
    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    2,209
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I responded with my opinion on your love of toys before. This will if it does happen be so fast so overwhelming... There won't be time to send an email let alone toys.
     
  24. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    ok speedy:smoking: but what if china and or russia replaces those missiles as we will blow up, a few months later over that rail road or ferry what the long term objective here:hmm: with this short term hit and run strategy?
     
    Last edited: May 27, 2017
  25. 22catch

    22catch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2016
    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    2,209
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's possible but I don't think likely and I mean that very strongly. Why? Our conventional methods are more than enough and I know the US is developing low yield and impact nukes but they aren't ready.

    Time has passed, the world has forgotten some... but if it comes to it. If KJU does not capitulate quickly on his missile program? We will be digging him out of a hole just like Sadaam.

    It's not nice . it's not pretty. But the US spends 600 billion a year on its military for a reason.

    I worry that KJU will force us to remind the world again.
     

Share This Page