SUPREME COURT WILL REVIEW TRUMP TRAVEL BAN, ALLOWS IT TO TAKE EFFECT IN MOST INSTANCES

You think you are being clever. That is a mistake.

 

lol ah yes the classic liberal argument. Label the argument then pretend you don't have to debate it.

Face the reality Mate. Trump has the legal authority to put a travel ban in place no matter how much you scream and cry about it.

 

They don't love people enough - they don't love the future innocent victims of Islamic-inspired terrorism enough to be willing to condemn faith itself (faith itself - belief w/out a courtroom level of evidence - is the underlying indirect cause of this endless holy war that we are passing on to our children's generation.) They are valuing faith over all the innocent victims of faith (such as victims of Islamic terrorism, or victims of FGM, or victims of Muslim/Christian persecution of gays, etc.)

 

On the contrary -- I think certain people are wound so tight they refuse to see simple, valid points.

Internment camps ended with FDR; any claim that Trump plans to intern Muslims is hyperbolic nonsense.

 

Actually I get what he's saying now. I wish he'd change his avy, I get him confused with the Frog Toddv or whatever all the time. It's actually a slap at the socialist FDR who is Democrat through and through. My apologies Tog.

 

Still waiting to see yours.

Then next time be more clear because when you imply Trump is being racial in a thread about what liberals call a Muslim ban that implication will be drawn.

 

And your point IS....?

 

Yeah..Somalia , Iran and Yemen are such great trading partners....der...

 

You just did, and you agreed with it.

Don't confuse your haste to overreact with a lack of clarity.

 

They already did, which is why he issued the ban.

 

The key point of today's decision, is that the vote was unanimous.

When every credible legal scholar says it's a slam dunk case, what does this tell you about the lower court decisions, and about the Mediacrat coverage of the issue?

The judges that pretended that their own policy preference, was a legal precedent, need to be removed from the court immediately. You can choose partisanship or gross incompetence as valid reasons for removal.

 

What the heck are you talking about, we have a supreme court that has 5 conservative vs 4 democratic judges basically forever. The middle judges are more in the middle but the makeup has been the same. Trump has replaced on conservative judge with a conservative judge.

 

The USSC justices are always appointed by the POTUS.

 

You fool! It's very very expensive to buy C4, suicide belts, ISIS flags, etc.......so Muslims spend a TON of money here - and their untimely funerals, cost to clean up the area's damage caused by their suicide bombs, and salaries of increased homeland security workers creates many many jobs for Americans. Letting Islamic terrorists in helps the American economy.

 

Yes, because Somalia, Yemen and Iran are so crucial to the tourist industry.

 

That's the point. Elections have consequences. The USSC has been overwhelmingly liberal before, and led to some of the most asinine rulings ever, as well.
Limey's don't understand actual governing by the people.

 

Don't forget pressure cookers....and all the pre-attack surveillance photos...

 

Yes, almost intact.

As stated in the OP.

Yes national security is free but then maybe people from other countries will feel safer to come here.

 

Ahhh, the "Participation Trophy"....liberalism at its best (well, actually its worst.)

But the real (well, in hind-sight) THREAT from the Japanese-Americans PALES in comparison to the REAL THREAT from Islamic-terrorists/Sharia. I agree that literally this very day camps would not be a realistic possibility - but when we get the level of attacks that Britain and the Philippines are getting, then we too will likely put ARMY TROOPS on our streets - just like Britain and the Philippines have recently done - because our police (like in Britain and Philippines) will be unable to handle the Jihad. And Britain and Philippines are not even Muslim-majority countries! Just THINK how bad it's going to get in Muslim-MAJORITY countries as the Jihad continues to rage!

 

Yes - with all the stuff the Jihadist will be buying I think it's safe to say we should RECRUIT JIHADISTS to immigrate to America!

 

Yes, does even ONE Islamic-majority country have its own unique, for example, AUTOMOBILE COMPANY? I don't think so, myself. It seems that Islam only takes, and doesn't produce for the world.

 

Of course not, shopping judges is finding an EXISTING panel that is sympathetic to your case. Do remember this is a different country from yours.

 

Only one of the justices was appointed by Trump. There was no "judge shopping" involved in this SC decision.

 

Saudi Arabia has a government and does vetting and works with us to do so. Do you REALLY not know why the countries picked were picked, that's really showing your ignorance of the matter you know.

 

In Britain (America will end up like Britain when it comes to Islam) the idea of Muslim camps have now been raised by Nigel Farage (the Brexit guy), and Katie Hopkins, and Tommy Robinson. Sounds like a real good time for Muslims to start some serious reform of their religion's texts.