BREAKING: Senate Panel Approves Wray ...

So the Donald can keep doing illicit things unchecked? You statists are all the same.

 

Kamala Harris has already surrounded herself with Clintons corrupt campaign operatives. Corruption, and deceit is a pandemic in the DNC. Simply cutting off the head, in this case HRC, hasn't slain the monster.

 

Say what? Just what has he done since he has become president that is illicit?

You delusionists are whats the same. Always seeing things that's just not there. But it is not surprising nor shocking.

 

The Demos are just like Daesh. Cut off one head and 2 more sprout up. We must not use weed killer. But just go with the straight vegetation killer. Just sayin.

 

Who is the he?

Who will be calling Mueller into his office?

 

You refuse to see the ties. The Russian Jr met with is a known lobbyist against the Magnitsky rule. Her husband has direct ties to Prevezon, the same Russian corporate entity stolen in a kleptocratic raid by Russian corporate priates. Prevezon has monies frozen due to the magnitsky rule.

In retaliation to the Magnitksy rule, the Russians formed their own human rights violations ban on Americans, Preet Bahara was on the list, the same guy who was investigating Prevezon - the same guy Trump dismissed, and upon his dismissal, the investigation into Prevezon is oddly called off.

Now, either that is a gigantic coincidence, or Trump and company are paying back some of their Russian pals.


Of the two, which one seems more likely to you?

 

Here is quick clue for you to fathom.....Trump Jr isn't Trump. Nor is Jr the President. Nor has Trump done anything illicit as president. Which is what you stated. Trump doing illicit things.

 

If you seriously contend that Donald Sr. Had no idea about these meetings you're the delusionist. Trump Jr. Couldn't give the order to drop the investigation into Prevezon.

 

Honestly, the "resistance" is turning out to be more an act of self immolation on the part of Dems, than it is a rallying cry. It's quite a spectacle to behold.

 

You forget this was back in 2016. Before Trump was President. That being said.....what evidence can you show that Trump knew about this meeting? Was he even in the same state at the time? Can you validate that much?

 

Not relevant. What is relevant though is that Trump Jr met with this woman, when he was elected Trump Sr. dismissed Bharara who was investigating laundered Prevezon monies, and then, the case is mysteriously settled for pennies on the dollar.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/p...ivil-forfeiture-complaint-against-real-estate

Tell me, you see no correlation here? This is a dismissal of an Attorney investigation fraud by a Russian corporation, Prevezon, who is then charged 2.5% of the total amount of monies they stole.

Of course the trial was just about to happen. What would have been revealed under discovery?

Surely you can see the ties here. If this had been Clinton you would be screaming for an investigation. From the release:

This could have blown wide open a wide crime syndicate, and yet, Trump, Mr. Law and Order, dismisses the attorney prosecuting the suit and installs someone who settles it almost immediately.

http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...-know-why-doj-dismissed-money-laundering-case

After Trump Jr. met with the Russian representative with DIRECT TIES to Prevezon, who would DIRECTLY benefit from a dismissal or settlement of this magnitude.

Surely. Surely. You can see there is something there. It's undeniable.

 

Wray with Trumps backing as the FBI takes back over any investigations.

 

Wrong it is relevant to what you stated. That Trump was doing things that are illicit as President. Which is hardly the truth or fact. Moreover the issues with Bharara doesn't have anything to do with this Russian bullshit.


All possible reasons Trump administration fired Preet Bharara
Every reason Trump had to fire prosecutor Preet Bharara is possibly correct and a benefit to his opposition.

The New York Times initially reported that a White House official said the firings were "emblematic" of the chaotic transition process but they also claimed that Bharara's firing was connected to his relationship with Chuck Schumer, who has become a willing target of the #trump administration for leading Senate opposition against him.

Preet Bharara's relationship with Schumer goes back to when he worked for him before the Senator recommended him to Barack Obama for his first term as president. Its also been widely reported that Bharara was asked by the now Attorney General Jeff Sessions and President Trump to remain in his position during a meeting at Trump Tower last November.

The notifications to resign were sent out on Friday, but Preet Bharara was immediately fired for refusing. Initial reports also suggested that the Obama-era prosecutor was likely removed due to his reputation for prosecuting insider trading crimes, as he was contacted by watchdog groups in the same week, asking that he investigate Trump for being in violation of the emoluments clause......snip~

http://us.blastingnews.com/news/201...nistration-fired-preet-bharara-001543721.html

 

Then why is it Prevezon was let off the hook, 9 months after Jr met one of their direct ties, and a few months after his father won the presidency and dismissed the acting attorney prosecuting the case?

Why was it settled days before trial, before evidence was due to hit daylight, that could have exposed the corrupt ties of Russians and their shell companies?

Russian bullshit? Bullshit on your apologist stance. Tell me, would you be letting HRC off this lightly? There is direct evidence here. Trump Jr met with a woman who has direct ties to Prevezon - who promised dirty info on HRC. Less then a year later and a lawsuit that would have probably exposed the entire syndicate crime network is settled after Don Sr. dismisses the attorney prosecuting the case.

What's bullshit here is your BLATANT hypocrisy. What's bullshit here is your BLATANTLY WILFUL ignorance to facts presented to you and the very easy to draw lines in this scandal.


Answer me this one question. If a democrat had their kid meet with a dirty Russian businesswoman with ties to a corporate entity being investigated for money laundering, and then went and fired the attorney investigating the business she represented, and mysteriously the case was settled for 2.5% of the amount exposed - what would you do?

DO. NOT. DODGE. THE. ABOVE. QUESTION.

And we will ALL know if you're telling the truth.

 

Oh are you trying to play for the Moral Equivalency? Did you forget Podesta and his brother taking money from the Russians and helping them get around BO peeps sanctions? That all took place before any of this Russian business with Trump. Given the pass, and then the deflection by the Demos about this Russian BS.

The only one playing the hypocrisy card is you. Knowing full well that the Podestas were dealing with the Shady Bank that Putin uses and his bestest of Buds. Knowing damn full well they were helping Putin and his boys get around the Peeps Sanctions. Not counting the money they were taking from the Russians. Notably Tony Podesta, Hillary's Big Money Bundler.

Oh and the reason Trump got rid of Bharara was due to his ties to Chucky Cheese Schumer. Which goes back in time even before all this Russian Crap by the Demos was stoked up.

Naturally you delusionists don't like that time line. Hence all this Russian conspiracy BS and the Slight of hand trick by the Demos to keep the focus off of them.

But it is notable that you fell for the Demos Bullshit.

 

Nope. Don't dodge the question. ANSWER IT.

Your credibility is on the line, ideologue.

 

I didn't dodge it.....I showed you why this crap is all a cover up. Your credibility was lost when you fell for the okie doke and gave Hillary and Podestas the pass and didn't say **** about it. Not at anytime were you spouting this BS over Hillary's Campaign Chairman and Big Money bundler and her Kremlin Connection with a known Notorious Bank and its Banker. Putin bestest buddy.

Now you are trying to present some conspiracy theory as to the real reason why Bharara was sacked. Which again had to do with Chucky Cheese Schumer being the Demos Senate Leader and his crony Bharara that he got the job for, in BO peeps Administration.

 

Yes, I agree, it is a cover up. By Trump and his associates. Now, kindly.

Answer me this one question. If a democrat had their kid meet with a dirty Russian businesswoman with ties to a corporate entity being investigated for money laundering, and then went and fired the attorney investigating the business she represented, and mysteriously the case was settled for 2.5% of the amount exposed - what would you do?

DO. NOT. DODGE. THE. ABOVE. QUESTION.

 

No its not a cover up by Trump and his associates. It is a cover up by the Demos as a party.....Trump didn't make Podestas and Hillary take any money from the Russians. Nor did he help the Russians get around BO peeps sanctions. That was the Podestas.

Its an illogical fallacy. As you think Bharara was fired over handling some court case he was involved in. While giving a Clinton Zombie a pass who had ties with thee dirty Russian Banker of them all. Despite an investigation that was taking place and then the Panama Papers busting out Hillary's campaign chairman and her big money bundler. Johns lil Brother Tony.

 

I insist you answer the question.

Why won't you answer it honestly?

 

take your bs somewhere else. this post displays rw morality perfectly

 

Aww cmon I rather make you take it. Knowing you can't handle it. But its good to know you can't practice what you preach.

 

Because you are locking in the false part. Which is the attorney being dismissed from a case. On your concept. Which isn't the truth.

Again.....its an illogical fallacy.

Demo or Repub.....doesn't matter.

So why weren't you screeching all of this over Podesta and his shady dealing with Sberbank and Putins bestest of buds? Despite being under investigation?

 

Answer the question.

Answer me this one question. If a democrat had their kid meet with a dirty Russian businesswoman with ties to a corporate entity being investigated for money laundering, and then went and fired the attorney investigating the business she represented, and mysteriously the case was settled for 2.5% of the amount exposed - what would you do?

DO. NOT. DODGE. THE. ABOVE. QUESTION.


ANSWER THE QUESTION.

 

We also know Comey let slide Lynch's meeting with slick Willie on the tarmac, a clear act of either collusion or at the very least a conflict of interest.