I stand to be correced :bow . The search pulled bwk's quote not yours bx4. But again reviewing your post in the matter you were quite anxious for the FBI to investigate it stating for example "Yes - what has been confirmed is limited. But it has been confirmed. That means the rest of the dossier cannot just be dismissed. It does not mean the rest of the dossier is right or wrong, but having confirmed some of it means the rest should definitely be investigated." "It is the rest of the stuff in the dossier that is explosive. The allegations are serious. Seriously serious. Like treasonous serious, and that is not an exaggeration. If some of the stuff in that dossier is true - and the US authorities can prove it to be true - Trump will die in prison." Even defneding it. " I think the allegations that are made are serious enough that it really does need to be investigated, so it can be either confirmed (in whole or in part) or dismissed (in whole or in part). I don't think it is good enough to say "we've found one factual error so the whole report is BS. We won't look any further."" So can you point me to your outrage over the collusion involving the DNC and a foreign national with ties to Russia in obtaining it?
Right here. It was stated "- He did not have an American translator with him, which was a breach of national security protocol (according to reports)." Each leader was allowed one translator. Trump choose his Japanese translator as he was seated next to the Japanese leader and his wife. According to the above statement he was only allowed to speak with the Japanese leader then unless the other leader spoke English. I don't think that was the case.
So you never voiced a complaint about the DNC Russian collusion nor called for an investigation into it?
Seems the poster you responded to is correct, you are trying & failing to create a strawman argument as you have strayed from the topic and this is of little surprise.
If reading comprehension was your friend, you'd understand he's not correct. There is nothing wrong with owning what you write. I don't know why the poster is still fighting what his posts specifically project on the subject.
Here is what happened, fizbo. Bluesguy quoted something and attributed it to me. I called him on it several times because I did NOT write what he quoted. In post 327 he finally acknowledged he was wrong and that the quote he pulled belonged to bwk, not to me. So, yeah, I'm correct. I do own what I write. I don't like people pulling quotes that other people made and attributing them to me.
Sure you do, the DNC/foreign national/Russian collusion that tried to undermine the election with this phony dossier. Where was your outrage over that collusion have you to this day called for an FBI investigation into that collusion?
Yes you were correct that the similar bwk alias was selected as the user, when you said you could not find the quote I went back figured out what happened and stood to corrected and found other supporting quotes from you. You have my DEEPEST apologies for my mistake , tiny letters are hard to read on my tablet versus my PC. So let's continue. Where was your outrage over the DNC/foreign national/Russian collusion to attempt to undermine the election? Is it to be found anywhere?
See message 254 where bx4 injected Well they attempted to do that through the DNC/foreign national/Russian collusion, so it is perfectly legitimate inquiry as to where was the outrage over that attempt to undermine the election.
US Establishment In Hysterics That Trump-Putin Summit Might Succeed "...US reconciliation with Russia would yank the rug out from under the phony justifications for spending hundreds of billions of dollars annually to counter a 'threat' that ceased to exist over a quarter century ago.."