I am not the spokesperson for the MSM; I have no idea if anybody reported it or not. I have no idea who assumed what. I just recall reading somewhere that she had a gash on her leg, but technically it is possible she had a heart attack with just a minor injury or no injury and the driver still be charged for her death. He is charged with second degree murder which is so loosely defined in Virginia they could proceed under a "he scared her to death" prosecution as has been done at least in other places like when someone has a heart attack during a robbery attempt. ( see https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter4/section18.2-32/ )
It's like the Kennedy magic bullet theory but instead of bullets it's fat left wing protesters. How they teleport around is going to be debated on for years!
Both women was hit. Both women landed on the windshield of the respective car. One of them is dead. That is 100% manslaughter on the driver. That neo Nazi idiot will be spending time in jail playing mommy.
He's not responsible for her health problems. By this logic he could have bumped into her in the line at McDonalds and been charged with second degree murder. He was likely trying to get away from the armed thugs with bats (aka Nazi fighting Antifa heroes) and in the chaos her ticker gave out after a few decades of trans fat consumption. That's not his fault
ROFL. So not only one, but TWO women were hit by the WHITE TERRORIST with such force that they were sent flying, one across one car, and the other across two cars! And yet, no flying women are seen on any of the videos that capture the moment exactly. I don't even have to try at that point. Seriously. I think we've done almost everything here. The only thing remaining is the motive of the defendant. And then, we can all sit back and watch the triggering happen.
Except there is no proof this actually happened. A gash on her leg is all they have definitively stated. If she was killed by impact on the windshield where is the autopsy report? Why has the left wing media abandoned this story, especially after this interview and "heart attack" was revealed?
Which they will have to prove if they want the murder charge they gave him to stick. Of course they could hold out hope for an all black jury who, like in the OJ case, will view "he a racist!" as an open and shut case. We will see
If he bumped her in line at McDonald's with his car as he was speeding through the store he could still be charged with murder. He had criminal intent. If he was getting away from alleged armed thugs, he clearly could have gone backwards instead of into a crowd of people since he clearly had no problem hauling ass backwards after he ran through the crowd of people.
Do you have a reading comprehension problem, or did you just pull that gigantic strawman out of your rear end. Who said they were "flying." Too many movies dull the brain.
Yes, of course...because that twerp, James Fields, was such a pathetic loser that the only way he could ever get close to a woman was by ramming his car into one. What a stud!
No arguments, resort to insults. Typical. I'm not the one making insanely improbable scenarios to save face here. You didn't even explain your scenario, or provide any reasonable alternative. Again one side comes up with facts and logic, the other side is just throwing tantrums. The triggering might start sooner than expected. And the most funny thing is, you're the side that started it all! You're the ones who used this story to smear white people as terrorists and smear Donald Trump as a racist. You're just getting your deserved backlash, which has everything to do with supporting Trump and defending whites from slander, and nothing to do with being pro-Nazi.
So now you are resorting to yet another strawman? Show me where I "smear" white people as terrorists? Put up or shut up. I've explained the scenario, TWICE. That you can't understand it is your problem. That you can't understand the photo, is your problem, not mine. Spare me your aux outrage.
Yeah, the cause of death doesn't really matter. Whether it was from sustained injury wounds from the attack or the aftershock, if he doesn't run into her, her chances of survival are(obviously) much higher. There's no defense and won't be any defense coming from me for the scumbag. Neo-Nazis and AntiFA are disgraces to this country.
Legally it won't help the driver to claim his victim was obese and prone to a heart attack, one takes his victim as he finds him, sometimes they are weak and infirm already.
This is interesting, but the dude who gunned the car - a wildly irresponsible and dangerous act - is on the hook regardless.
"He's not responsible for her health problems" is a defense that will get laughed out of court. He hit her with the car, and she died. A reasonable jury will conclude the two are related.
Well putting your "peaceful counter-protesters" bait aside for a moment, I think it's a legitimate legal question. In some states, a death from a non related cause like a heart attack can be a murder charge during the commission of a felony. I don't know if that's true in Virginia. He was originally charged with 2nd degree murder and I wonder if this coroner's report will make a difference.
Ah so had his car not hit her you are basically saying she would have just been walking down the street and had a heart attack. The hits just keep on coming, hate to tell you this but your racist buddy is going down.
Okay to play devil's advocate here IF Heather Heyer actually did die from a heart attack the heart attack was induced from the car ramming into TWO parked cars. Fields is still responsible for murder here folks. Your logic breaks down right away and also the coroner's report ruled it a vehicular homicide. Personally, the fact that people are trying to defend a man who murdered a woman and hurt like 19 other people by DRIVING HIS CAR INTO A CROWD OF PEACEFUL PROTESTERS is ridiculous.