breaking 1 dead, multiple injured in shooting at Tennessee church, police say

Antifa, being Nationwide, and being a animated group at his rallies, deserves his attention. I think the Usher kicking that guy's ass is a bigger story. I want to see that guy's picture.

 

Regardless of politics, I think "nut" is the key word here. Political or religious movements don't cause nutjobs. Nutjobs are attracted to political and/or religious movements to justify their actions.

 

It certainly was a ballsy move. Running out to his truck and getting his own gun was also interesting. The church was racially diverse.

 

Spoken like a true Socialist, atheist Russophile. Good job!

 

Right, let's not pay attention to his religion, political views, websites he may have viewed, groups he may have sympathized with, or any of the other kind of stuff that was looked into exhaustively in the case of Dylann Roof. This case is completely different. This guy is black, and his victims were white. Therefore, the only logical conclusion is that this guy was mental ill, or some other victim of circumstance.

Case closed.

 

The silence regarding Antifa says it all. Only Pelosi said something and she was probably forced into it. Antifa is the Left's KKK.

 

So you think it was just to look at Roof's religious and political background or not?

I know all the idiot racists are choosing up sides here, but the church was racially diverse. I don't know the races of each of the victims and I doubt that matters. The shooter was Sudanese, but I have no idea about the basis of his motive. I do suspect, like Roof and other mass murderers/attempted murderers, that he's a nutjob.

 

Doesn't really matter if I thought it was right or not. His entire background was analyzed in regards to his motives, and many 3rd parties were blamed for the attack. I doubt you were complaining very much about Stormfront being blamed.

"Racially diverse". Were any non-white people shot? Or are you going to just pretend they were victims as well?

 

Yes, and this nutjob's background will be analyzed too. **** Stormfront and **** the Islamic Jihadists.

I haven't seen pictures of the victims. Why is their skin tone so important to you? Here's picture and link of the usher who stopped the shooter:

https://bluelivesmatter.blue/robert-caleb-engle-antioch-church-shooting/

 

It's important because you made it a point to bring up how this was a "racially diverse" church, as if non-whites had been victimized as well by the non-white shooter.

And no, this guy's background is not likely to be investigated nearly as much as Roof's was. The websites he visited will not be pressured to be taken down, nobody on the left is going to argue that whatever group he fought for (likely Islamic) should be censored more on the internet. The Sudanese flag is not going to be taken down anywhere in the country. The left will once again showcase how selective they are with these types of stories.

 

Yes, I did in response to your post. So now it's my fault? ROFLMAO

 

The victims were white, the shooter is black. Saying "but the church is racially diverse!" is just your attempt at making it sound like minorities are victims in this story too, instead of the perpetrators.

 

Nice opinion. Now prove it.....or does that involve a Stormfront link?

 

Here's the shooter:



Here's the woman who was killed



Another victim:



As for the others, the fact that our liberal media hasn't thrown out a black or Hispanic face yet to show how minorities are victims of this attack as well is a pretty good indication that the rest of the victims were white. They were likely targeted by the black shooter for their race.

But you go on thinking that minorities are the real victims in this shooting.

 

For non-racists: http://www.burnettechapel.org/

 

....and this proves the church wasn't racially diverse? Interesting.

 

This looks to be a be a similar shooting to what Dillon Roof did---only the colors have been reversed.

Also, the Leftist media will not make a fuss about it.

 

So what if it was? Were any non-whites the victims in this shooting?

 

It could be. It could also be religiously motivated. Still, like Roof, I think this is more about a nutjob looking for an excuse to harm others than a racial or religious thing.

 

I'm still waiting for you to prove there weren't. You're the one declaring this to be a black man vs. a white church event. I'm saying the church was racially diverse and I don't know the motivation of the shooter.

I do know the hero of the day; Robert Engle:

What does Stormfront think of this picture?

 

We know the shooter is black. We know the woman he killed was white, and at least one of the other shooting victims was a white woman. The media has not thrown up a picture of any non-white victim in this shooting, and they almost certainly would have done that, because they have the same hope that you clearly have, that this was not a story of a black minority attacking exclusively white people. That would make this story very similar to the Dylann Roof story, and they don't want to admit non-white minorities are capable of these kinds of attacks.

 

Yeah, the ****ing media and those pesky right-to-privacy laws, notification of kin laws, yada, yada, yada. When will individuals learn we have a right to immediately know everything about them if they are in the news, amirite? LOL /sarcasm

 

We knew Roof's motivations and the identities of the victims within a day of the attack.

 

Hmmm, Will CNN try to spin this as proof that Emanuel K. Samson is really another white supremacist racist Nazi trump supporter!

 

Wearing a ski mask on the ski slope, while running your snow blower, of ice fishing is an acceptable and logical activity. In a bank or trying to get on board an airlines flight is not the best idea in the world.