The same people who started out wanting peace and love ended up wanting to disembowel “sociopaths,” “narcissists” and “perverts.” In both cases they violated constitutional intent. First they did so for libertine values; then they did it for fascist values. The correct response is that the constitutional system does not exist to suit your mood. The constitution is clear about all things on this matter. You are obligated to respect people's rights even if they are sociopaths. You cannot go around demonizing people and trying to wipe their kind off the face of the planet. I am not a sociopath or anything close to being a sociopath. But I care enough about the world and about humanity to stand up to people who want to conduct witch hunts and inquisitions in countries that are intended to be free. The behavior of the women involved in this persecution is very similar to the behavior of the first-generation African leaders known as the Big Men. These leaders used the claim that their people have suffered historical injustice to get money and concessions from the West while preying on their own people. The Big Men were not victims of anything. They were wealthy despots. Instead they used the West's compassion to wrong their own people. And that not only hurt their people but taught the people in the West to no longer support the genuinely disadvantaged Africans. The leaders of academic feminism are themselves not victims of anything. They are middle-class or upper-class Westerners enjoying successful careers. Instead they attack their own constituents: Especially the women who are kinder and prettier than they are and young men nearest the liberal centers of learning and culture who are the least likely men to be genuinely misogynistic. Through their venal behavior they have damaged the reputation of women as such, feeding a resurgence of real misogyny. This does not touch them. It does however injure all sorts of good women all around the world. And in attacking such men, they have also alienated a crucial ally and made enemies of people who otherwise would have been allied with feminism. In truth, the definition of narcissistic and sociopathic disorders is very similar to the Nazi definition of Jews. “They aren't really human.” “They think they are special.” “They prey on our people.” “They are evil and can only be evil whatever they do.” It is for this reason that people who have perpetrated this hysteria have been rightfully called Femi-Nazis. Are “sociopaths,” “narcissists” and “perverts” evil and can only be evil whatever they do? This is completely irrational thinking. Anything capable of choice can act rightfully. This is even the case for people who have for one or another reason been disconnected from empathy or were born with some kind of a neurological disorder. If your heart fails, use your mind. Figure out what is another person's position. And then do what is right by that person. If you do not have regular human emotions, then you need to intellectually figure out what everyone else takes for granted. Any progress at all in that direction will give profound insight into people – insight that most people don't have. If you have to learn something consciously, you will understand it better than people whose learning has been unconscious. This understanding can most certainly be used for all sorts of wrong; but it can also be wielded rightfully. “Guns don't kill people; people with guns kill people.” With people like that, the solution is not to lynch them. The solution is to provide them a valid moral structure. And then these people will use what is in many cases extraordinary abilities and home-grown knowledge to do things that are beneficial rather than destructive. So now America has a president who has been diagnosed as a narcissist. Yet he is president and the people who believe such things are not. Enjoy what you are getting and don't ask me to help you. After all you are all strong independent women. You don't need some guy in Australia to stand up for your interests and your rights.
Human Rights Watch: Widespread rape, sexual slavery in CAR feud... Widespread rape, sexual slavery in CAR feud: HRW Fri, Oct 06, 2017 | WEAPONS OF WAR:Sexual violence is being used by the Seleka rebels and the Christian anti-balaka militias fighting them, and could be crimes against humanity
One in six women has been sexually Assaulted .IN AMERICA ...someone is sexually assaulted every 90 seconds..IN AMERICA
LOL! Looking the wrong way at someone is considered sexual assault in AMERICA because of the goofy ideas by the left. These women in Africa were held as sex slaves and gang raped. How dare you make such a comparison.
What is the definition of sexual assault? I'm asking because it's a term that's often used in place of rape, so it includes a lot of things other than rape.
Sexual assault is any type of forced or coerced sexual contact or behavior that happens without consent. Sexual assault includes rape and attempted rape, child molestation, and sexual harassment ... About 19.3% of women have been raped at least once in their lives, according to survey results released Friday from the About 2% of men have been raped during their lifetimes, according to the survey of conducted in the USA in 2011. Additionally, an estimated 43.9% of women and 23.4% of men experienced other forms of sexual violence during their lives. And 15.2% of women and 5.7% of men have been a victim of stalking.
Oh I see, because more women have been raped in Africa therefore we shouldn’t complain about rapes here....By the way sex slaves are a serious problem in this country as well as gang rapes. And when someone trivializes sexual assault as “looking the wrong way at someone” I understand they have a lack of human empathy. I hope you don’t have a daughter.
And we don’t need misogynists like you standing up for us....especially one who seems to lack an understanding of feminism. You’re not the solution you are the problem. Trust me we are not asking you to help us.
It is a wonder how people even date in today's hypersensitive world, let alon breed. I guess I need a true definition on sexual assault? No more dirty talk for Toefoot and Mr Weinstien?
So child molestation and sexual harassment are both "sexual assault?" The term is meaningless then since it includes almost everything.
If you go back and read my post I said nothing of the kind. The problem is not lack of empathy on my part but rather confusion on your part.
I see a real problem with trying to lump kid diddling into the same category as, "Nice gams toots." Sorry but that is not only nonsense, it's dangerous nonsense because it removes the ability to speak about sexual assault in an intelligent way. Data becomes meaningless when everything is sexual assault.
To Just because something isn’t the same doesn’t mean it’s not comparable. ...different degrees. Two men fondling a woman is worse than one man...but the act is still unwanted and terrible.
No. You're putting a construction worker wolf whistling in the same category as a violent rape. It's really amazing that you are trying to argue that's comparable.
No the real nazis and the ones who supported them along with their ally Hitler are the ones allied with islam to destroy the European Christians. My hope is that once they use islam to conquer the rest of the world islam turns on them like they did the Jesuits when they invented it to take over Jerusalem. Once this monster is given power it is hard to control. In their own words. Only one of many narsissist ,sociopath perverts. Admitting their plan to wipe out the white man. Because it is impossible for them to wipe out any other race because of mere numbers alone.
Not true. Just because a man looks at a woman or compliments her is not the same thing as raping her. Now I do know that many libs in Hollyhood and politics are child molesters and rapist. Want to see some of the worst freaks to ever live, check out the stars below. I bet you've not seen much worse demons in your life as Gwen No Doubt, Jullianne Moore and many others, $25,000 a ticket.
Complimenting a woman is not sexual assault. In my groups men ask how is the best way to compliment a woman....I say the same way you’d compliment a man
Well in my day I loved it when boys fought over who would open the door for me at the walk in theater. Tell me how beautiful I was and ask if they could kiss me. And whistled when I walked by. Well since then I went from a Georgia peach to a prune and those days have been gone but they were fun while they lasted. I like boys being boys back then and men being men long as they keep it PG. Trump would have had his face slapped if he ever said anything like that to me. And maybe a beat down if one of my brothers was around. Men honored their mothers and women back then along with their nation. Hippies and fems took care of both of those attributes.
I guess to you honor is having a door open for you. For me honor is opening the door to the board room because I am an executive. To you being told you are a beautiful makes you feel Important, to me being told I am smart is more meaningfulI I don’t yearn’ for the days when I needed my brother to defend me I prefer to be able to defend myself. Your needs are very superficial . Honoring isn’t keeping women down, keeping them dependent....honoring is respecting women as equals. Just being told you’re pretty made you feel worthy. I remember being told that I was too pretty to be a feminist and I was pissed. I found it patronizing