Even when they don't even nod to tradition (because heritage wasn't known until DNA testing was done, or whatever), they're still embraced.
Nascar ratings are apparently in the toilet even though they stand at attention before driving around in a circle. Still, though Nascar ain't much, you'd think slow-witted Nazis might feel a little inspired that if they try than can accomplish something.
Your argument is that even though there are: Left and right white, blacks, browns, yellows, reds and... I don't know. (There's got to be people pissed without a color.) Left and right Muslims, Catholics, Protestants, Saints and I don't know. (I promise whomever I forgot you matter.) Left and right rich, beautiful, poor, ugly, smart, fat, dumb and skinny. That somehow Jews managed to be different? Take a step back and think. They might have had more of an emotional grip on theirs (I have seen myself with LDS compared to others), the fact of the matter is Zionism is Jewish nationalism, while Globalism is one world (with quite a few powerful Jewish families on the team). A split, no matter how cohesive a unit, was inevitable. They really are against each other.
We are talking about groups, not individuals. Obviously there are exceptions to every rule, but given the histories and statistics of the groups, it would not be unfair to make assumptions about their political affiliations. Blacks are a liberal group based on their voting habits, which are almost monolithic. Jews not only originated most modern day liberal thought, but are also heavily committed to it, based on statistics. The "hello fellow white person" meme I posted earlier explores my point a bit, that there are some Jews who pretend to be something other than what they are in order to advance various political objectives. Some Jews are liberal, yet appeal to conservatives, since they know that conservatives are a loyal supporter of their ethno-state - the very same kind of ethno-state that whites are not allowed to have. And globalism isn't necessarily incompatible with Zionism, at least in the framework of the system that we are currently operating under (theirs). Promote globalism in Western countries, while practicing nationalism at home. It's been a good strategy for them so far.
I assure you, in a world with a billion Muslims already, with globalists openly flooding them into western nations, while encouraging the herd of retarded leftists that they're "good people" - one world = no Israel. Do you think Zionists are that dumb? Come come now...
Yeah, it's my view that it sounds like a basic Nazi viewpoint, or KKK, white supremacist, whatever you want to call it...I asked before what the difference is between what people are saying here and what is said on the American Nazi Party site... sounds like the same thing to me. Aside from "debating" here, I also don't get what people want? They want to own the media, or some of the media...buy it then, earn it, work for it...no? Free hand out? I don't get what it is people want here other than expressing what sounds like hatred and bigotry along the lines of Nazis and Hitler.
The impression I get is not that they're opposed to Jewishness (at least I hope that's not it), but they're opposed to the overwhelming bias of umbrella liberal ownership of media. Personally, while I dislike knowing all my news is filtered by Progressives, I don't care about the media ownership thing at all. It's a filthy job, and someone has to do it.
Basically, everyone of wealth has family rackets. Jews have been around long enough to know which carry the most weight, and specialize in them. The argument then becomes, "are there certain areas of culture too prolific to allow ANY sort of nepotism - via regulation and quotas"? It is a legitimate argument, just as too "big to fail", and "corporations being allowed to own other corporations" - are. The capitalist in me says the free market will correct Hollywood, and the media is the place where public oversight needs to exist. But with current trends of "the government no longer counts as public oversight" means we have bigger issues at play. Look up the Smith-Mundt Act. This was put in place in 1947 to make sure the newly created CIA could never use propaganda at home. That clause was reversed in 2014 - bipartisanly. How many of you know this? Like I said - we have bigger issues at play.
Well not sure if it was this thread (there are so many focused on race/religion it blows my mind), but when I pointed out that the majority of elected officials in the US are overwhelmingly white males (something like 65 percent) even though they are only 30 percent of the population, the reply was that everyone else needs to get an education and make something of themselves.
Not really. Its been my experience without the nod to tradition the "embracing" doesn't happen. Acknowledgement maybe but embracing no.
Yes, exactly. I said that Women Of Colour ought to seek to enter politics, if they feel underrepresented. As for media, anyone can work in the field .. given sufficient motivation and ambition. Good luck to them. I wouldn't do it for any amount of money. Well, maybe for $10m a year.
You have a point. I guess it's more like a hand shake, than an embrace. Though god knows, embracing does sometimes happen ..
There are 18 pages of comments here and all sorts of views & wants so you'll need to be specific as to which views are "Nazi viewpoints". "Nazi" is an abbreviation for Germany's 20th century, political National Socialism so Nazism isn't quite the same as the KKK or white supremacist. I suspect that you're referring to discussions involving Jewish people and their predominance in MSM. I can't speak for what it is that other people want. You'll have to ask the individual Posters. By the way, 20th century's German National Socialists were not quite as racially fixated as the KKK or white supremacists in that Germany's military was made up of many different racial groups and Jesse Owens commented on how much better he was treated in Germany than in the US For Example: "Adolf Hitler’s Armed Forces: A Triumph for Diversity?" Veronica Clark https://www.inconvenienthistory.com/1/3/3102 EXCERPTS "The important thing to realize is that had the Nazis been as racist as most historians have argued, then they could not possibly have garnered the immeasurable level of support that they did. Even after Stalingrad; Spaniards, Slavs, Franks, and tens of- thousands of other non-Germans continued to fight for the Nazis on a volunteer basis. Frenchmen and Arab volunteers gave their lives in the final fight for the capital of Berlin in 1945. Hitler continued to allow thousands of Jewish men to serve, and many did so with incredible tenacity and valor. One has to call into question whether all of these Jewish men and other non-Germans were really as opposed to the Nazi regime as they have claimed after the fact. Their tenacity and determination suggests otherwise in many cases. The Jewish soldiers Bernhard Rogge, Helmuth Wilberg, Erhard Milch, and Ernst Prager come to mind. At least two million non-German foreigners and ethnic minorities served in Hitler’s armed forces at one point or another. Without foreign and non-German help, the Germans never would have had their Western defenses prepared in time for the Allied invasion. Let us think about two things here. Hitler’s Wehrmacht-Waffen SS combination was the most culturally, ethnically, and religiously diverse military force in Western history. In spite of this fact, we are all supposed to believe he was a hyper-racist (my own term) like some other Nazis. Harry Truman, not Adolf Hitler, said the following: “I think one man is as good as another so long as he’s honest and decent and not a ****** or a Chinaman. Uncle Will...says that the Lord made a white man out of dust, a ****** from mud, then threw up what was left and it came down a Chinaman.” Had Hitler said this, historians certainly would have used it as evidence of his uncompromising racism."CONTINUED
Yes, so in other words, this whole thread is a crock. Other than it gives Nazis, KKK, white supremacists, etc., a chance to whine their usual useless hatred and bigotry as they have since forever even though it's anti-American, dimwitted, and shameful.
It's not a crock to those who have a problem with biased media. Or to those who simply have a problem with Jews.
More nazi apologist drivel. All those jews mentioned were mischilinge that had one jewish grandparent and had to apply for special exemption of which another criteria was being raise in a "jew free" environment under the nuremberg laws. they were no more jewish that hitler was. And yes Hitler was a hyper racist who believed in a truly warped vision of white supremacy. No amount of spin or weasel will ever erase the facts. Your hero was one of humanities greatest scumbags.
Who said he was my "hero"? I'm just pointing out facts you don't like about the racial & religious make-up of the WW2 German military.
very few actual Jews served in the Wehrmacht or Luftwaffe. No one declared a Jew by german law was allowed to serve. ZERO served in the SS. those who did serve were 2nd or 3rd Degree Mischlinge and many required a certificate of Aryan blood from Hitler.
I did. there were no "real" jews in hitlers armies. Every one of them had only one grandparent and were not raised as jews and some weren't even aware of the mischilinge connection. I don't think it comes as much a surprise that all kinds of untermenschen fought for the nazi scum.
I'm sorry to ask, but is that on the same level as "real" socialists? It has gotten so bad with leftists that Socrates would have declared a "not real socialism" fallacy to add to the list.
Nazism was a response to the pedophilia and bestiality movement of the Weimar Republic, which had close ties to Bolshevism, which I would consider to be the most evil society ever.