RE: Because our government, like all governments, will & has misled its citizens when certain members of that government consider the truth to be "damaging to National Security".
I have been there more than once, first in 93 and twice later and I know for a fact it would have been easier from that window. The target was very close and moving very SLOW almost directly away from the point of view of a shooter in the window. There would have been only a very slight rise of the target from bottom to top in the shooter's field of view and the slow moving nature of the target would have made that rising effect negligible. Even moving that slow the angle from the knoll would have required a serious lead on the target the shooter would have had to practically move the muzzle of the rifle as the limo moved.
Yes that is true but such lies always come out usually sooner rather than later and there is simply no evidence of it here. Applying occam's razor it simply makes more sense that one nut did it rather than a huge cast of characters pulled it off and no one ever left evidence or admitted their guilt.
Don't be silly. People are convicted every day on circumstantial evidence, right? It was impossible for Oswald to have done the job, impossible for one bullet to have inflicted so many wounds in so many different directions, and the evidence points to government agencies having their finger on the trigger. As I said, you can debate what agency did what and why ....................... but it looks, talks, and walks like a duck.
No one has been able to make that shot "as proof" of anyone being able to do it as the commission said it was done. Duh. Innocent until proven guilty. What you are saying is that "there is not evidence at all to show" Ho Chi Minh "could not have done it". I see. It's like that, huh? OK. So show me your evidence that Oswald did it. Show me evidence that Oswald could have done it. You are wrong there.
Wrong. Many have made those shots and proven that it could easily be done. I already posted video evidence of people recreating it and showing that not only was it possible but well within Oswald's abilities. They recreated his shooting right on film. So much for your claim. There is a mountain of evidence that Oswald did it and no evidence whatsoever that anyone else was involved. I am quite correct and you are making claims you cannot support with any evidence. You are simply making claims with no support at all and your assertions are not even backed by any knowledge of the event.
No some people have been convicted on circumstantial evidence but not every day and certainly not for major felonies. It was not impossible for him to have done the job and yes we have proven that here in many posts. You are babbling incoherently about multiple bullets and multiple directions because no one including the government ever made such a claim. Oswald fired 3 shots. The first missed and chipped the curb near the underpass, a fragment of the bullet or the concrete nicked the face of a man named James Tague who was standing nearby. The second struck Kennedy in the upper back or lower neck and passed through him and went on to strike governor Connally. After exiting Connally's chest it struck and passed through his wrist and then struck him in the leg. It barely penetrated the skin and then fell out later. No major changes in direction and nothing impossible or extraordinary about it. The third struck Kennedy in the head. Again nothing extraordinary or magical. That is what the Warren Commission reported and it is based on solid PHYSICAL evidence nothing about it is impossible and you have no evidence to refute it. There is no evidence you can cite which points to anyone else pulling the trigger or being involved.
I am right actually. We have shown the evidence that not only he could have done it but did do it all over this thread. His rifle was found at the scene with his prints. The only expended casings were matched to his rifle and no others. The only recovered bullets and bullet fragments were matched to his rifle to the exclusion of all other rifles. The autopsy which was performed by experienced experts prove Kennedy's wounds came from above and behind. The same is true with eh medical evidence from Connally's wounds. Oswald was seen immediately before the shooting on the sixth floor and was the only one remaining on that floor when all others left. He is the only employee of the TSBD who left the scene and failed to return. He is the ONLY person in Dallas who shot a cop that day in an attempt to evade capture. I can go on but that is a ton of real and damning evidence and it is far more than what we get for many murderers. Now what evidence do you have?
Well you didn't say it so you don't have to admit you believe the US government, your posts are more than enough. But you didn't call yourself out on your own questionable claim. Oh really, so where is the post where you question the official JFK narrative then?
Where is yours? You never question anything. Or more importantly face any questions directed to you. You only repeat that the government lies about everything over and over. That is not questioning the government. You only proclaim something which is unreasonable
Red herring #1 and #2. Why are you questioning me? Here I thought you were kind of insinuating I was wrong that you believe the US government. You're asking me about crapola that has nothing to do with the fact that the US government is covering up the JFK assassination by admitting they're hiding the evidence. Red herring #3. I don't need to be an expert in anything to know that a metal projectile hitting a human head at a high velocity will not cause said head to lurch violently toward the path of the projectile upon impact. This is simply common sense. Did the silly watermelon experiment show the watermelon being hurled forward? Red herring #4 (the "mess"). Sure Sherlock, it was "messy" that JFK's head parts were all over the trunk of the limo. Red herring #5. Us? You mean you, you're the one asking, no one else. What is "usual" or not has nothing to do with the facts (i.e. the stand down). Sorry, I haven't read that you questioned anything about the official JFK narrative so far. Questioning me and everyone else who doesn't buy it, absolutely. That is your MO as already noted. But feel free to point to one reasonably significant question, just to show me how wrong I am.
No I mean this: youtube.com/watch?v=8A3UH4d2exo You tell me what you think after watching the video. For me a stand down before the act means someone knows. That's backed by history, it's irrefutable. “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” - Joseph Goebbels
That's enough fantasy for one day. Now get me a medium crab bisk soup and keep your hands away from your petzl.
Those were proven facts not fantasy so show some evidence as requested or better yet learn a little more about the assassination as you are out of your league.
yes as long ago pointed out it was not a stand down nor done right before turning the corner. It was at the airport and was merely one agent confused as to what his assignment was. You got debunked and crushed on that one.
It did not lurch toward the path of the projectile because of the impact of the projectile it did so because of other forces. Which you willfully ignore because it wrecks your fiction. It left debris from his skull in the windshield and dashboard as well which you also ignore. The mess went everywhere. There was no stand down your fact is a false claim. Been done. You have been proven wrong across the board.
Yeah, official proof from the Warren Commission. "Your" league? I am nearly 71 years old. I was on this earth when it happened. I remember what they said .... long before you came along to read the censored version. The point is, I have heard all of the revisionist excuses through the years. That doesn't prove that I know who did what and when, but when the official story changes as often as I change my socks (to fit the original, see-through lie) then I know there's a long-tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs. A sure sign of guilt.
The Warren commission report remains solid and backed by evidence and you have no idea what it contains as you have never even bothered to read it. Nor has it been censored. It is irrelevant how old you claim to be or where you were when it happened you are out of your league and have no idea what you are talking about. You did not even know how many bullets were fired. Getting back to basics you have no evidence for your claims the evidence is in fact overwhelming and against you.
Yep. I'm about your age and I know exactly what you mean. Here's Dan Rather contradicting what anyone can see with their own eyes. As an aside, I'm fully aware the US government boot licking troll I have on ignore is stalking my posts with his favorite tools ("debunked" and "crushed"). Responding to him (her?) is a waste of time and energy. Most intelligent people know the official JFK narrative is a scam just like the official 9/11 narrative.
To be honest, I don't know. Maybe the truth is out there and just been dismissed as a "conspiracy theory"