How about we deport the parents of the kids under 18 ? Yes I understand that there may be children who are born in the US to the criminal illegal parents so what do we do throw out those children who are American citizens? Do we throw them out with the legal parents and let them come back when they are 18 if they want to.
The tax payers have cost now. https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/...ignal&utm_campaign=pushnotify&utm_medium=push Because parents are responsible for raising their children and making decisions for their children. Some decisions effect the children in a positive way like where to live, and others do not, like dealing drugs or murdering their spouse. Until a child is old enough they will always be effected by their parents decisions. I'm done now. If this last plea didn't get through you are either refusing to listen or live in a different world then I live in. I wish you luck in winning this debate, but my head is bloody enough from beating it against this wall.
Their legal status is irrelevant. Please read the ruling. Or at least go to this thread and read the discussion. I'm not going to derail this thread any further re proving this..........http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ht-citizenship.407716/page-34#post-1065006608
I don't know the answer to this either. But according to factcheck.org "the vast majority of DACA holders are adults." https://www.factcheck.org/2017/09/spinning-facts-daca/ *DACA and anchor babies are two separate issues. Just so they don't get mixed together in this convoluted thread...
Do you watch the news and what Democrats have been fighting for? Amnesty and chain migration, hello? This isn't a secret.
I believe that was done under Reagan, could be wrong! But what's your plan for states and cities across the U.S. that will not conform to your new laws then and now?
Thank you for exposing yourself, Butterball, as a sham. You took my parody out-of-context, but true to being a conservative, never apologize for being a fraud.
I'm pretty sure we didn't have the internet in the Reagan years All businesses are required to comply with federal labor laws.
Yes that's fine, but you're still not addressing states like California and New York that will not comply with Rahl law?
I agree with you but we do get into a cross over of issues if an illegal owns a DACAlite and a child born here which is I guess can be considered an anchor baby.
So you’re saying,m Democrats don’t want chain migration or amnesty? THen why are they fighting over a govt shutdown if they want illegals to be responsible for their actions? It’s as if you don’t actually read the news. Yet you post here? Very strange
You are absolutely correct and when the children apply for welfare it should be granted, but if the parents come forward to collect it they should be arrested and deported. Of course they will have the option of finding someone legally in the US to take care of their children, taking the children back to their home country with them or putting the children in the care of CYFD until they are 18.
Once more our birth rates means that we are below replacement level so without new blood coming into the nation we will be in a world of hurt. I know that for some strange reason people like you feel that the moment your ancestors got off their boat the gate to this nation should had been closed and the welcome sign should have been taken down but that thinking is insane on so many levels.
That not how our government system work but then with Trump and the current GOP running the nation our system is barely working now in any case.
Of course there is no reason that a fifty year old american can not do the labor of a twenty year old in our fields and such. Without new comers we will be a rapidly aging population as we are below repeat below replacement levels.