Florida shooting: Parkland school student calls Donald Trump a 'piece of s***' over tweet

Where in the constitution does it say you can't? Where does it say you can't own cannons? It doesn't. Know why? Cause merchant (civilian) cannons were crucial in winning the revolutionary war.

 

So what's the proposed limits? And is the motivation really preventing these types of shootings?

Can you absolutely gauarantee without a doubt, that restrictive laws will prevent more mass shootings? What is the limit of those restrictions?

 

You don't deserve the courtesy of a reply, seeing as how your post is a filthy degenerate screed that doesn't attempt to present a point of view but instead see how many foul pathetic insults you can cram into one extraordinarily foul post.
It's frankly the equivalent of a bloated, stinking corpse left by the side of the road put into post form and it's just as offensive.

But the FBI (the leadership of the FBI, specifically) has politicized
it's bureau and committed a fraud on the FISA court by misrepresenting the Steele dossier and this is not how the United States of America is supposed to do things, carrying out political vendettas against political opponents through the trust and power vested in their office.
It's not Nixonian because Nixon never dreamed of anything this big or nefarious. It's exactly what you'd expect to come out of the holdovers of the country's only Alinsky disciple president and his administration Go sanitize yourself now, if possible.

 

I am afraid that because every anti trump media outlet has it as their main story, it is well qualified.

 

Eh hem...

http://amp.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/broward/article200523359.html

Sorry... you were saying?

 

I meant both of those things. They're not contradictory. They're unusual among disorganized serial killers, because most disorganized killers preferred more visceral and intimate means of killing like stabbings or beatings. They're also unusual in that they actively invited media attention, which is a very rare trait among killers despite what the media would have you believe.

I'm not trying to make a point about guns, I just have a very macabre fascination with murderers. My original comment was mostly concerned with dispelling the illusion that random violence is a new phenomenon by comparing a modern murderer to a 70s murderer.

 

Ok... cause I thought your original point was that this era was the "golden age" of mass shootings, not serial killers who killed one or so at a time as anomolies who killed their victims with firearms, in response to this:

Oh ****... you did.

 

Well, they're INCREDIBLY rare, crime is WAY down, and children are safer than EVER.

Tragedies will occur, however.

Do you have a plan to prevent them?

What is it?

 

Yes!

Children?

Safer than ever.

Shootings like this?

INCREDIBLY rare.

Crime?

WAY down.

Great news, right?

 

You have no plan for these INCREDIBLY rare shootings?

Well, they are INCREDIBLY rare, and tragedies will occur, so perhaps it's best not to become hysterical.

 

What "mental health issues?"

Who decides who gets what constitutional rights?

How?

 

It's true that you have no argument, but others brought up constitutional rights before you did.

These shootings are INCREDIBLY rare, as the list you posted (but apparently didn't read) demonstrates.

One of us is brainwashed, yes.

But again, these shootings are INCREDIBLY rare.

Good news I'd say.

 

Who decides "fitness?"

How?

The Constitution fits in where?

 

Except she’s wrong. Gun control will not stop school shootings.

 

A "licensing agency" decides who is permitted to retain their basic constitutional rights?

Wow.

Just wow.

 

These incidents are actually INCREDIBLY rare, with children safer than ever.

 

Not constitutional.

Clearly.

 

These incidents are INCREDIBLY rare, and children safer than EVER, so...

More gun control?

Seems illogical to me.

 

The Constitution...?

 

She's an ill-informed, foul-mouthed embarrassment.

 

Even I wouldn't go that far!

Grounding or suspension will suffice I think.

 

^ VERY good point.

 

I don't know what the FBI could have done, but I like your second sentence.

 

They are so common. Your plan sucks