‘It’s just horrifying’: Seven killed in Australia’s deadliest mass shooting in 22 years

they are-they are trying to undermine our freedom in order to create a bigger and bigger government and give violent criminals more safety

 

Yes, we are well aware of your propensity to reject inconvenient facts.

That's okay; I don't have any more respect for your viewpoint than you have for mine.

You keep missing the point that I do not nor have I ever advocated for violence as a primary option. But, like most authoritarians you hold any viewpoint but your own in contempt, and your snide, arrogant, dismissive nonsense while you tell me I should just lay back and accept my Constitutional rights being stripped from me - without due process or regard to the Constitutional violations necessary to achieve your goals - show me that you and your ilk won't be swayed by protests or any kind of common sense, Constitutionally legitimate argument.

So, I'll just state unequivocally that there is a line in the sand whether you want to admit it or acknowledge it or not, and if people like you keep going the way you're going, ignoring our clearly stated warnings, you're apt to step on that line fully convinced we won't do anything about it. The consequences of such arrogance will be catastrophic, and the blood that results will be on your hands.

 

No, not terrorists. Just traitors.

 

LOL!!!!!!

your pathetic hyperbole makes me giggle.

your threats are silly.


.....and not taken seriously

 

bla bla bla.

supporting stronger gun laws when they are WAAAAAY too liberal, is common sense.

not "treason".

 

"Given that gun bans and gun control measures cannot restrict access to firearms any research that suggests otherwise is obviously contrived"

 

Did NYS go lower than 10 rounds?

 

Your partisanship just came out in the above posting. You cannot be taken seriously anymore in this thread.

You are protecting it because you believe you are right; its nothing more then a belief on your part; there are those who believe differently then you and believe they are right in their views and you are wrong. Do you see where I'm going with this?

 

"The SAFE Act was recently amended. The amendments include the following changes to the law:

• Suspending the requirement that only magazines that can contain 7 rounds or less can be purchased. Going forward, magazines can be purchased that can contain up to 10 rounds. Magazines may only contain up to 7 rounds regardless of their capacity, unless you are at an incorporated firing range or competition, in which case you may load your magazine to its full capacity.
• Clarifying that active law enforcement continues to be exempt from the prohibitions on the possession of high capacity magazines, assault weapons, and magazines containing more than 7 rounds, as well as the law prohibiting weapons on school grounds.
• Ensuring that local safe storage laws are not preempted by the SAFE Act."

https://safeact.ny.gov/

 

no one wants to give violent criminals more safety.

 

So no real cap at seven since you can still buy 10 round mags with no one monitoring how many bullets one has in their mag. And one can load 10 at a gun range. Weal ass amendment. Just as weak as the federal AWB was.

 

It's still the law.

 

It is...toothless, but it is. I'm guessing practically no one only loads 7 in the mag.

 

No, they understand.

They don't care.

 

You mean like enacting knife control laws?

Yeah that will never happen right.

 

You mean like encouraging Russia and China to nuke US aircraft carriers and our military installations?

 

its called "War"

soldiers get attacked in a war, especially when they start the war.

 

And you encouraging the enemy to strike our troops during a war is also called something. Do you know what it is?

 

The US enacted knife control laws? When?

 

what do you call the brave Germans who stood up to the Nazi regime?

 

So useless legislation that does nothing more than potentially cause law abiding people to inadvertently run into legal problems with litigious gun hating states.

 

No, but London has.

The left would do it here too.

It's always a case of having "not gone far enough" with the left.

I'm sure that's Maduro's opinion as well.

 

Yes, a situation you encouraged Russia and China to engage in to protect Iran.

 

So no knife bans in the US. Thanks.

 

to protect the world, including the USA

the world needs to guarauntee Iran's safety, in order to prevent a wider war