You are 100 % correct. Men in Australia are so effeminate they don't even know they are men unless they look at their anatomy after a shower. The majority have turned into a bunch of cowardly pansies to frightened and afraid to protect their own gender. Therefore, it wasn't any great surprise they dropped to their knees and surrendered their dignity to bear arms to protect themselves and their families. Australian pansies are standing behind their women for protection these days, because their women have become more aggressive, dominate and masculine than the men. You just have to look at what is happening with that mongrel Sarah Hanson-Dumb. She is making a mole hill into a mountain regarding the comment to get TV exposure time, nothing more, and everyone (even the pansy men) are buying into her bull-s.h.i.t. Real men need to stand up and close the retarded moron down once and for all. This is the same moron that called Senator Barry O'Sullivan a "PIG" during a Senate inquiry and was never once asked to apologise for her outrageous remark. Now she gets insulted, and the world has to stop and everyone has to apologise because she is a woman. However, she doesn't have to apologise to Senator Barry O'Sullivan because he is a man. YES. Australia has become a land of effeminate men wearing slim fitting skinny jeans and the women wear pants. LMFAO.
Actually that is a Furphy posted by those who wish it were true https://www.factcheck.org/2009/05/misquoting-yamamoto/ As for the rest I think we would rather live in a society where children do not get mutilated or die in astounding numbers
Kids! 92yo woman shoots 72yo son dead over plans to put her in care home Anna Mae Blessing was arrested on suspicion of murdering her 72-year-old son She said her son wanted to put her in a care home as she was difficult to live with Police said they had visited the home before after an argument between the pair Arizona police said Anna Mae Blessing was arrested on suspicion of murdering the 72-year-old man, and was being held in lieu of $500,000 (AU$677,000) bail, court officials said.
The measure of masculinity - or humanity - is not in how many firearms a person possesses. Nor is the choice to support legislation restricting the use of firearms in any way wussy. It's great to live in a country where I don't fear my fellow citizen might be armed. And it makes policing a lot safer too - for everyone.
Guns don't kill people, people kill people. If someone really wants to kill someone, they will find a way besides using a gun. The Muslim terrorist didn't use a gun to kill and injure people in Flinder's Street - did he? Nor do African gangs running riot in Melbourne suburbs use guns, they use machetes. Kind of makes you wonder if do-gooders demonising guns comes from an irrational personal psychological fear, rather than factual based evidence. From my understanding, there is no evidence to support there has been a decrease in killing or crime within Australia since firearms were taken away from citizens in 1996.
I don't walk around unarmed. You would not stand a chance. And I don't visit Communist countries. No matter how pretty their Keltic babes look on the sandy strands of beach there in their bikini's.
Of course people use guns to kill other people. That's what they're meant for. And no they don't need a gun, there are other ways of doing it but guns have an advantage over many other methods. There was no Muslim terrorist in Flinders Street. He was a nutter. Apex gang using machetes. Of course. Guns are too hard to come by for them. Why do you draw a fatuous link between killing and crime and Howard's buyback? I happen to disagree with it as flawed policy for various reasons but it wasn't instituted because of "killing and crime", it was as a result of the realisation that Tasmania's firearms laws were so slack that a nutter could obtain certain firearms legally. Howard wanted to make firearms laws uniform across Australia and he used a particular approach that allowed him to get it done and to overcome constitutional obstacles. He forced the backward states into ensuring effective firearms controls were put in place.
Exactly, and limit access to guns has to reduce deaths, you would need some moronic mind to think otherwise. Of course, they could use a knife, a baseball/cricket bat, a bomb or just run them over with a car, we have even seen some of these. Now a car is easily accessible to most people, yet it isn't used a lot. I don't think most people actually realise that the gun isn't just the method, often they will sit cleaning it and fondling it for days, weeks even, it becomes some perverse relationship with the user, it becomes his partner, often leading him. Running them down, stabbing or even blowing them up is not the same, often it is too personal, it's very easy to just squeeze that trigger that extra millimeter and much too late once you have to change your mind.
Is he serious? Stormy Daniels' husband Glendon Crain cites cheating as grounds for divorce The husband of Stormy Daniels, the porn star at the centre of a very public row with US President Donald Trump, has filed for divorce in Texas. Ms Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, claims she had sex with Mr Trump before he became President, something Mr Trump denies.