Can you or rather will you extract the flames, the hate speech and that kind of talking and have a sane discussion? We will start with the nature of the unborn. What the mother believes is contained in her body. What part of the female is the baby? Why should life be extinguished as not value?
Since in my life, I am the unfortunate male that lost two children to the women impregnated, let me tell you what she and I called the life. We called it our baby. Why did we call it our baby? Because absent an abortion, statistically it was our baby. I have had children so i know when my wives were pregnant, we were in the process of having our baby. Both women agreed. We did not sit around discussing our babies in terms you use.
First let's not ignore how the Supreme Court actually operates. The Justice put in by Trump is not red eyed and a danger to society. He is a current Judge and highly respected. Cases do not simply appear in the Supreme court as posed by the 9 justices. They flow up to the court and get screened. i passionately want Roe v Wade overturned but simply do not accept that this Justice is the way to get it done. He has not shown signs this is his intention. A major problem at my advanced age I keep noticing is the vast change in Americans since Roe was made the law. This nation is far more vicious. I believe we are not beating crime. i believe we have a party devoted to destroying religion, free speech, lying about voter suppression, and trying with a frenzy to import millions of other nations people for nefarious reasons. They want voters is all I can think of. There is no rational reason why poor of other nations need to move from their state of poverty and violence to drag it here. We know a lot are nice people. But also with them is like a mattress infected with bed bugs. The infection is worse than the gain from the added mattress.
You are correct. The dems get nervous when they do not get thier way just like when they seceded from the Union over hurt feelings and fear of losing their slaves.
Unfortunately, that is not true. More than the majority vote during presidential election years. Obviously, they think that's the "important vote". Which is why parties "sneak in" important voting legislation before the mid-terms because most often less than the majority vote*. Like Donald Dork did to give even more of a tax-advantage to the money-bags who helped elect him ... *Which is why that if voting is an intrinsic right of every citizen, then it should be an intrinsic duty that they vote. Or pay a fine if they don't. Moreover, creating a national identity card (based upon our SS-number) would help "purify" voting in both state and national voting. Why the US does not have one is another one of those fanciful ideas that "in a true democracy one does not need an identity card". Which is pure BS, given the problem we are having with the migrants. I was a migrant, when I was transferred from the US to work in Europe. No problem, because the company for which I worked petitioned the government to allow me an entry permit. We should expect that same level of veracity of all who enter the US and are not permanent residents of the US. That they ask for (at the US embassy in their country) for a "Tourist Permit" to enter the country. Without which nobody but nobody gets in - and when they do, they are arrested and remanded immediately to their home country. If they refuse to acknowledge their home-country - then they become permanent guests of the US government ... in prisons.
So if you cannot prove me wrong then you can only dismiss my post....lolz! I destroyed your premise with one small sentence....I win again.
Of course they are trying...they are eroding it and in many states the laws are prohibitive ..like having to wait , etc
You personified your ZEF the same way many people refer to their puppies as their babies. If it had developed it would have indeed been your baby...but they never did. You lost the fan stash of a toddler, not the reality of a ZEF
It is against the law to extinguish life....we are talking about ZEFs Ps I found your tag kind of sad...sounds like she thought she had a sucker
Will you please never refer to the mothers baby by that scientific name. What if you got called your scientific name all the time? Instead of you being human, you get constantly called homo sapien!!!!!
At first I did not want to believe this about the woman. She owned a very nice home. I knew when she bought it, she was married to a pastor. Who she married caused me to think she was high morals. When I first got suspicious, I still was not willing to think this of her. Anyway, she is ancient history for me. But when I figured her out, I quickly stopped dating her. Even had I been willing, being with a dishonest person kills the deal. And she was not honest.
In a word, yes. No automatic fire-arms whatsoever in a self-indulgent society that wants to mimic what it watches on the BoogTube. I don't use that word mischievously. What people see on the TV molds their behaviour in real-life. Especially as regards children watching the mindless bloodletting. Which is also why political advertising during campaigns should be forbidden. It is here in France and nobody misses it! However, there are programmed debates between candidates that cost them nothing show on prime-time TV. If you are running for public office and have something to say, then TV-management should be compelled to allow candidates to say it on TV free, gratis and for nothing. Period.
Will you stop calling a zygote a baby? I know righties don’t like science but I repesct science . I don’t mind if people call me a person, if people call me a woman because that is what I am. I am not a zygote
Of course you’re not seeing it because you don’t educate yourself...just like trump described his base. Come on, try educating yourself so you sound informed
Are you afraid of science? At least it would be correct unlike calling a fetus a "baby"...might as well call it a teenager while you're at it...
Roe vs Wade carefully & consciously made a ruling that would avoid killing babies. They dug deeply into when a fetus no longer needed a mother's womb to survive and made abortions illegal from that point on during a pregnancy. Killing babies if far too strong a word for the deliberate and tedious job those Justices did to protect the rights of both the fetus and the mother. This is something the far right Pro-Fetal conservatives selectively choose to ignore.
It's NOT infanticide if it's not an infant. To be an infant, it must be a viable, self-sustaining organism that can survive without the aid of a mother's womb. This way, the mother has legal rights too--not just the zygote.