"Trump admin has no strategy for election security, and no one's in charge"

Or you could just provide the government issued report, highlighting the details of voter registry "alterations" and we'd be done with it. Reading plain text doesn't require much thinking ... I'd simply be forced to absorb the factual data presented. Specific state registry, specific # off affected voters, specific source of manipulation. Where's it at?

 

Have you actually read the NSA "top secret" PDF linked in this thread? Why not read it and ask yourself why the next leak by Winner was killed IMMEDIATELY.

And, BTW, what's Mueller working on for his main task again? Don't hurt yourself with the spinning answering that one .

 

Remind me again who was in charge of securing our US voter system from attempts to breach it in 2016.
Was it the same guy who said our system was too massive and complex to ever be hacked and taken over? I think it was.

 

Remind me again which candidate benefited from the RU interference and why Obama, following the constitution and not wanting to put his hand of the election scale, went to Mitch and Paul and they flat out turned him down & threatened partizan wolf cries?

 

I'm not going to place any faith in a gender confused traitor OK? You made a phony claim ... you were exposed for it. It's over. The Russians didn't alter US voter information. They may have used ID info to ID key districts to bombard malleable liberal voters with anti Clinton propaganda, but that's the extent of it. "Reality" ... "Winner" ... good God what a joke.

 

BTW ... the next leak would have been another CRIMINAL disclosure of US intelligence ... jeesh!

 

LOL, two post needed to address the same quote! Telling! BTW, you are side stepping the PDF, question is why?

 

Trump does have a simple plan. Voter ID.

 

Addressed both ... "Winner" didn't leak data on registry alterations ... "Winner" wasn't permitted to publish additional stolen intelligence ... asking "why" is ... well I'm not permitted to say what that is. Again ... no investigative panel or agency concluded registries were altered. Spinning the official consensus won't work with me OK? I'm not a feeble minded voter who can be manipulated by propaganda. That's why my guy is in the oval office.

 

You address the reason why the PDF was "top secret"? And you also addressed the second document she was going to leak before she was QUICKLY SHUT DOWN? Must have missed it then . Your guy (read as RU puppet) is in the oval because the Russians, with Trumps encouragement, rigged the 2016 election.

 

Wrong. The answer was president Obama! He was the guy who was in charge of securing our election system and he was the one who claimed hacking our system was not possible and elections could NOT be influenced due to the nature of our country itself.

Happy to step in and educate you. You're welcome.

 

So you opine post, throw in a weak ad hom flamebait while side stepping clod-like and ask for a thank you as debate format.......lol, got it.

 

Who designated the PDF "classified" ... Trump? Priebus? Nunes? Who? The DOJ ... Rod Rosenstein designated McCabes conference table ... well ... the $70,000 dollar price tag ... "classified" ... to the extent that congress had to subpoena the unredacted expense account entry to find out. Your conspiracy doesn't support your claim anyway. Predicting what you think, hope, Winner would have published is a rabbit hole ... straw - man reach ain't it?

 

You still have not addressed the content of the Winner NSA PDF, why are you running away from the content of the PDF and the next document that was going to be leaked by Winner?

 

I just asked a question and you ducked it in favor of hypocritical formulaic trollery. Go back to work. I'm sorry I disturbed your mission.

 

The content doesn't support your registry alteration claim. Why are you running from that? Not at all interested in discussing facts I'm aware of and that are separate from the alterations you claim took place. You must be getting dizzy. I know I'm getting bored by it.

 

So now the first sentence is the straw....man reach. Well that was too easy to expose. Last sentence is more infantile flamebait. No debate necessary by me but to point out the MO in play here.

 

So now the shuck & jive post while still not addressing the content of the Winner NSA leaked PDF. Got it.......try to address the content of the PDF, tks.

 

Well I would support letting Putin know that any more interfere with our elections would be consider an act of war that we will reacted with whatever means we consider appropriate.

 

You discuss the portion of that PDF that proves voter registries were altered. That's your claim. Not even "Reality Winner" resides in your registry alteration "reality".

 

And still you avoid the issue.

 

There's no evidence of your allegation of a Trump/Russia connection. However it is common knowledge that the American left has evolved over several decades to be simpatico with communist philosophy. So it is laughable that the left would pretend to be abhorred with Russia and try to link Trump with them as if the left thinks there's something wrong with that. Sorry, but it's just a really stupid ploy. Or do you deny that the left is at odds with traditional American standards/values and capitalism. Clearly it is the left that conspired with Russians to sink Trump, and remains fully engaged in the great injustice of trying to overturn the election they had hoped to steal and secure by any means possible.

 

And the straw....man double down just a little "cleaner" this time.

 

There is enough evidence to have appointed a SC, some thing for you to read and ponder:
§ 600.1 Grounds for appointing a Special Counsel.
The Attorney General, or in cases in which the Attorney General is recused, the Acting Attorney General, will appoint a Special Counsel when he or she determines that criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted and -

(a) That investigation or prosecution of that person or matter by a United States Attorney's Office or litigating Division of the Department of Justice would present a conflict of interest for the Department or other extraordinary circumstances; and

(b) That under the circumstances, it would be in the public interest to appoint an outside Special Counsel to assume responsibility for the matter.

Consider the above with Mueller's mandate:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3726408-Rosenstein-letter-appointing-Mueller-special.html

 

And yet again.