I tried it and, yes, "idiot" images yielded this: https://www.google.com/search?q=idi...wuvcAhUqy4UKHVMMDRoQ_AUICigB&biw=1366&bih=631 Hilarious!!!
Thats because Google has built political bias into its algorithm.Try it in Bing (which is using Googles old 'unbiased' algorythm). I just did, and I had to pass by Feinstein, Biden, a CNN host and the fat guy who made 'bowling for columbine' before I got to a Trump meme.
I didn't make it up man. Its called advertizing. Money rules the web. https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opini...not-impartial-they-are-biased-just-ncna849886 And apparently, the money leans to the left: http://www.canirank.com/blog/analysis-of-political-bias-in-internet-search-engine-results/ Suffice to say: the idea that 'trends' dictate search engine results is a myth. They play second fiddle to advertising in that dynamic.
there are others who says these algorithms are right leaning and promote racism: https://www.google.com/search?q=goo...69i57j69i64.3524j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
with all the rampant racism and hate from the far right that we see in the USA every day, it is a good bet that the majority of those things are racist and exert a big influence upon the populace
Just tried an image search for moron (that was Rex Tillerson's description of the man, after all) on DuckDuckGo. Only one US president appears, and he appears numerous times.
I tried it with bing and after several pages including several of Trump I have not come across any of the people that you mentioned. Perhaps you misspelled it?
you tell me... (FTR my original comment was based on results I got from my phone... which wouldn't let me post screenshots for some reason. results from my PC -below- were identical) I showed you mine. Will you show me yours?
That is an interesting and valid point to bring up, at least partially. Google probably uses algorithms which tailor searches to the searcher and/or to what is most relevant at the time, but not according to some conspiratorial political bias from within Google itself. Anyway, I just gave idiot a try on DuckDuckGo. It strongly resembles Bing's results. These unbiased search results demonstrate that Trump is more of a moron than an idiot.
Sorry, home in bed with malaria and using a phone as well. That could be part of the issue. As I reside in Africa bing or Google would filter relevance by location and most here would not find your list as relevant but Trump would be.
Did you find this hilarious ??? So one has to ask is, back in 2016 when you googled "Donald Trump" 90% of tr results that came up were negative stories about Trump. When you googled "Hillary Clinton" 90% of the results were positive stories about "crooked" Hillary. How much collusion was there between Google and the Obama White House, the DNC and the Hillary campaign ? How much collusion is there today with Google and the "resistance" to take down the sitting President of the United States ?
Can you or the Daily Fail demonstrate anything unusual about Google lobbyists meeting with a sitting president?
Google lobbyist meeting with the Obama White House on an average once per week ??? What are they lobbying for ? Or, what was Obama asking Google for ? You would expect Google lobbyist to be lobbying in Congress not at the Obama White House. The safest search engine out there. -> https://duckduckgo.com/
Here were the results I got using DuckDuckGo when I googled "Moron." -> https://duckduckgo.com/?q=moron&t=hi&ia=web Here are Google's results when you google "moron." -> DuckDuckGo "moron" image search results. -> https://duckduckgo.com/?q=moron&t=hi&iax=images&ia=images Google "moron" image search results. -> https://www.google.com/search?q=mor...ve3cAhWCFHwKHS6QA0AQ_AUICigB&biw=1366&bih=627 It's like comparing apples to oranges and Google seems to have a political bias. FYI: DuckDuckGo doesn't spy on you or register every key stroke you make. DuckDuckGo doesn't sell your confidential information or what you search for to anyone. Unlike Google, DuckDuckGo doesn't give a **** on how much money you have in your banking account.