so its just coincidental that liberals voted for and supported authoritarians like FDR Obama Hitler Stalin Mao Pol Pot Castro??
You continue to make ludicrous comments. Remember that the authoritarian personality also isn't education friendly!
You're a newbie in America so I'm willing to be patient and introduce you to the culture: Harvard PH.D's, for example, have huge egos and huge authoritarian personalities so support huge libcommie authoritarian government whose policies they imagine they will dictate. Now do you understand? Freedom and capitalism render them useless so they naturally hate it!!
translation: I was defeated once again so once again will switch to substance free mode and hope I fool everyone!
Defeated? You're not even engaging in the debate. There's no academic conspiracy. Liberalism is indeed found to be related to greater analytical thinking. The authoritarian personality goes for a binary black/white outlook, quite alien to an education developing critique.
how is that possible with 120 million dead from statist liberalism? Give us and example of this greater analytical thinking?What does your fear teach you?
Analytical thinking wouldn't generate such a ludicrous argument. I'm not a liberal, but why make such silly argument about liberalism? You just destroy any chance of coherent comment.
Why not cut the BS? Give us an example of this greater analytical thinking which you say is associated with libcommie statist thinking? I've asked 3 times now. It's a simple question. Shall I ask 4 times in row?
you've said you're a liberal market socialist statist. A statist is statist whether a monarchist statist or communist statist. Our Constitution made all forms of statism illegal in America. Do you understand now
You do struggle so! This is about liberal traits. They are found to be more analytical. You're a typing example of the alternative, as illustrated by your insistence on using made up incoherent political economy terms.
Please don't make stuff up. I have repeatedly told you that I'm not a liberal. You simply ignore that as you adopt the binary world associated with the authoritarian personality.
Another silly comment. Imagine if you could be analytical and use democide data to make sound political economic argument? Seems a stretch, but we can dream.
actually you're the quintessential liberal if we use American definitions. We don't change defintions to suit different countries and different centuries. You have to learn to speak the common language if you want to participate. Now do you understand?
ok I've asked 28 times now for an example of this superior liberal analytic thinking. You rejected 120 million dead as an example. why not give your best example? Must I ask 28 times? why so afraid?
Again, completely wrong. Speaking American doesn't give an excuse to ignore political economy and erroneously pigeonhole according to the binary. Perhaps Liberalism's ability to understand the mutual exclusivity of capitalism and socialism is an example of higher level thinking?
Our Founders created the universe; they pigeonholed, based on all of human history, according to binary: statist illegal, freedom legal. 1+1=2
Our Founders created the greatest country in human history, so that is the highest level thinking possible, while libcommieism killed 120 million with the lowest level thinking possible.