Never claimed to be a general, but I AM someone who has first hand experience of watching officers demonstrate appalling incompetence with weapons.
Wrong. We have a right to life, and a right to defend that life, and thus we have a right to the proper tools with which to affect that defense. Period.
No. What I have is a country that has steadily moved towards more freedom to carry firearms with a homicide rate that has plummeted to 1940's levels. People who think disarming others leads to less violent crime are simply stupid.
I served in law enforcement, and we did joint operations with the military more than once. Frankly, based upon the tenor of your comportment on this forum, it is painfully hard for me to take anything you say seriously.
That's a lie, and an astonishing fail considering the documented rulings regarding Constitutional rights considered by the court.... that until the criminally idiotic Miller decision made such an astonishing mess of things.
Instead of mindlessly critiquing those who are supposedly doing something wrong, perhaps it can be explained on the part of yourself as to what conduct should be engaged in that is considered right.
Oh please. Same old same old. You did this and that, and no one else knows anything. We're all in this together.
Some individuals know how to manage a fortune five hundred corporation. Other individuals do not even know how to tie their own shoelaces.
And thus you attack brave men and women putting their lives on the line to make this country safer. You must be so very proud.
You've never had a point. We have less gun regulation now than we've had for the last 80 years, and our violent crime rate is back to what it was 80 years ago. Your entire premise is a logical fallacy.
Dude we are 25 times the gun death rate of other developed countries. You pointed out ONE GUY who used a gun to stop a shooting. That was pretty funny. LOL