How a Democratic House will affect gun rights

Simply because something has been researched, does not mean the studies are valid in the real world.

For instance, in one study, those carrying out the research found that a parachute is no more useful to someone jumping out of an airplane than an empty backpack.

 

They spun it so fast it nearly created its own weather pattern

 

Serious lack of understanding of the term research

Tell me - do you believe that Dihydrogen Monoxide is a clear and present danger to man as well??? I mean there is plenty of evidence to show that it is a dangerous substance

 

https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj...ign=tbmj&utm_content=weekly&utm_term=20181214

It is humankind. Everything is a clear and present danger to the species, especially when it is utilized improperly.

 

Bullcrap and you know it.

 

To be frank, in the US in an average year more people are murdered by water than by an AR-15 used in a mass shooting.

 

Yep!! Sure know it was Bullcrap

 

Following the gun lobby logic then

Water does not kill people people kill people

AND

Why should we learn to swim - drowning wont affect ME!!!

 

Glad to see you finally acknowledged how false your claims truly are.

 

IT is scientific humour

And bloody good at that - thanks!!

They must be aiming for an Ig-Nobel Prize

The footnotes really say it all

https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj...ign=tbmj&utm_content=weekly&utm_term=20181214

 

Oh! I thought you were talking about the original bullcrap creator

Faux news

 

They are not, they just reported what the idiot stated.

Guess you cannot handle the truth when it makes a stupid liberal, look like a real liberal.

 

While off topic to the ongoing discussion, is it possible for yourself to participate in the ongoing discussion in the following thread?

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-dies-in-custody-at-the-border.547342/page-54

There is currently a disagreement over whether a minor can succumb to death via dehydration within a period of eight hours, while devoid of any preexisting conditions.

 

I LIKE ad hominems

They a a definitive indication that the opposition ha run out of arguments

 

They are guessing

Unless you know all the factors involved

Wait for the coroners report

 

Why? What do you think the Democrats can do to him?
Wait... are you under the impression the Democrats can remove him from office?
Bwwwaaahahahahah!

 

Tell us again how Aussie gun laws prevent mass shootings when law abiding Aussies have full access to firearms fully capable of being used in same.

 

This is a big pile of non-sequitur.

 

Thats a semantic argument I never engage in, and the point wasn't about swimming; it was about being held underwater in a murder. More people are killed each year by being murdered by drowning than in a mass shooting where the shooter used an AR-15 on average. That's how low the actual risk is.

 

You have deliberately redefined the target

This is the equivalent of saying “more people are killed each year by being flogged to death with shoe laces than by handguns bought from Eddie the eighty nine year old who only opens his shop twice a year

You have taken a minor number of deaths caused by only one type of weapon

I suppose that is to try and justify why rapid fire weapons should not have restrictions

Sorry - wont work

 

If the discussion pertains only to specific firearmss such as the AR-15 for example, why should the number of deaths its illegal use can be attributed to not be separated from all other firearm-related deaths using differing types?

 

Your proposal that "rapid fire weapons" should have restrictions won't work. It's not Constitutional, nor would be it effective here in the US. The GCAs here continually propose that "assault weapons" be banned, citing the danger to the public. When that danger is actually quantified, it's wouldn't actually justify a ban based on danger to the public.

 

"Rapid fire weapons"?
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

 

That's apoarently good since gun sales and NRA membership has been faltering without the fear of gun banning. Got to gin up that hysteria to kerp commerce flowing.

 

Everyone knows that more guns make us a safer country. That is why America has the losest rate of gun deaths among all developed countries. Just kidding!