I dislike comceding anything to a foreigner who is only here to attack my country But since the fall of the old soviet union, which coincided with the assumption of power by baby boomer presidents clinton, bush and obama, US foreign policy has been reckless and destabilizing in many ways
Just to make it clear - I'm a foreigner who has always since childhood admired your country. But that was then - this is now?? Something strange has happened, and you seem to be acknowledging it. I am not 'only here to attack your country', I'm here to tell the truth as I see it.
Thanks, but we dont need your assistance I guess you are a euro And they are no wiser or better in any way Because you have your own generation of clueless baby boomers in chage also Indeed, thanks to immigration your lot seems as bent on self destruction as the libs in my country are
It's an arrogant man who ignores well-meaning advice from a friend?? By the way I'm not a euro, I'm an Englishman.
A friend? We have never met I consider your views on US foreign policy but certainly not on our internsl domestic issues Unfortunately most foreigners are not willing to confine themselves to our relations with north korea or syria They want to lecture us about abortion, gun ownership, the environmemt, gays, or other subjects that are none of your business
I totally understand how you cant see it any other way. As for stupidity in confronting Russian aggression, perhaps a history lesson might be in order. OTOH, stupid dangerous irresponsibility is a hallmark of Trump's tenure so far. He didn't even consult with his commanding generals before declaring ISIS defeated and ordering troops to be pulled out. Meanwhile he has "legitimized" Putin's cheating on an international agreement. Another nuclear arms race is of course entirely intelligent, safe and responsible. But you can't see that for what it is, since apparently trump can do no wrong in trumpland.
True, but with MAD Putin can push the envelop as far as he can. Perhaps you are too young to remember the nuclear "brinkmanship" of the cold war. No worries, it won't be too much longer before its all deja vu all over again.
So if nuclear arms control is so last week, I guess it doesn't matter if Iran wants to develop their own. Or that North Korea, now that they have them, might continue developing them. By withdrawing from the treaty, he has absolved Putin of his cheatin' ways. Bigly Putin win hand delivered on a silver platter by your Dear "toughest on russia" Leader.
Lol. I am sixty and remember the cold war well. Putin is a very different creature than Khrushchev was and the Soviet Union was very different from Russia. In many ways it is NATO that is pushing the envelope and Putin who is being reactive. Don't forget that Baker III famously promised that NATO would never move one inch past Germany. Putin has to find a way to defend his borders without retaliating dangerously against a superior force. All he has is diplomacy, tactics and the threat of nukes in Europe's backyard as the last straw. I don't like Putin's social conservatism nor his authoritarianism but the mistake the West makes is in casting him as a cartoonish villain rather than the pragmatic, strategic opportunist that he is.
"Russia has jeopardized the United States' security interests, and we can no longer be restricted by the treaty while Russia shamelessly violates it," "We will move forward with developing our own military response options and will work with NATO and our other allies and partners to deny Russia any military advantage from its unlawful conduct," https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...u-s-russia-nuclear-weapons-treaty/2737306002/ What part of this do you disagree with?
Defend his borders? Is that what he is doing with Crimea, Ukraine and the black sea? Is that what he is doing with his aggressive cyber war? Does he need hypersonic missiles to defend his borders? I totally agree that he is pragmatic and a rather good strategist as befitting a senior KGB operative. But, he is also perhaps the biggest thief in history, and abuser of his constitutional power and a murderer, which definitely puts him in the villain category. But when he stages pictures of him being a "man's man" and "true leader of men" I at least attribute some cartoonish character traits to him.
I don't disagree with the notion of "denying" russia any military advantage. I merely disagree on how to do it. Personally I would have imposed even more sanctions on russia. I would have actively solicited international support against their nefarious activities, BEFORE, I "officially" started another global nuclear arms race. Odd how Trump doesn't care if a treaty is upheld or broken or even ratified when he withdraws from them.
Ah. So you agree with the reasons, just not the action. Oh well. How is that relevant here... or anywhere else?
Denying adversaries the opportunity for military advantage has been the DOCTRINE of the united states since WW2. Or has the fact that the US militarily outspent the rest of the world by at least an order of magnitude escaped you? Or perhaps all those nuclear proliferation agreements and arms limitation agreements were merely diplomatic time wasting? I do disagree with trump's kneejerk responses. I prefer a little more contemplation, consultation and coordination in the decision making process of world leaders. Gee I don't know. I guess it is relevant because we are currently discussing the "relevance" of his withdrawal from the nuclear arms deal as a "first step" instead of a last one?
And so... as I said... you don't take issue with why he did what he did, just what he did. Oh well. Did Trump break any treaties by the act of withdrawing from them?
Very correct. From Russia's point of view, they are being surrounded by U.S. and NATO aggression: I happen to agree with his view's on social conservatism....it is certainly better than your average American liberal's view on social issues. Russia is now a federal republic just like our own.....claims of dictatorship are rooted in the fact that they don't have term limits on the Presidency, other than a prohibition on serving more than 2 consecutive terms. Thus Putin can serve 2 terms and skip one, then serve another 2 terms. He won't be eligible to run again in 2024, the next election cycle. Crimea voted to secede from Ukraine and then voted to join the Russian Federation. Given Crimea is made up of around 80% ethnic Russians and the Russian economy is much better than Ukraine's, it was an easy choice for the locals. Separatists in the Ukrainian states of Luhansk and Donetsk declared independence and want to form their own countries. When Gorbachev tore down the wall, he didn't leave Russian military bases in Germany......like we did.
Russia has always believed itself surrounded by aggressors, so there's nothing new here. Maybe because the Germans wanted American troops, not Russian troops, in their territory.
Foreigners only like it when the US goes to their assistance, but then complain that they didn't arrive soon enough.
And that's as you see it, Cerb. But between us and youse is the media, and the trash that they promote makes it difficult for anyone to get along - either in the States or with European allies. The BBC has always been the worst, or among the worst.