Yet there's been a recent push in New York and Massachusetts to expand access to late-term abortions. And in California they're probably going on all the time but the state has been looking the other way.
Women are waiting to start families... upwards of age 35 .. so there is a reason to wait and test at 14 weeks.
The reality is that the Pro-Choicers here would be all too willing to sacrifice this baby in the OP to keep abortion legal. Even when we're only just talking about abortion at later gestational ages.
Oh please....don't tell me you are willing to help that baby if it needs any government assistance at all
Yeah I thought so. You could care less about that baby.....if it costs you a penny. You are pro life for the fetus because it costs nothing
Or if it makes you $50 bucks. I hear if a fetal brain is harvested properly without being damaged, and it's a nice size, it can fetch up to $1500 dollars.
At least I care about babies enough to put my money on the line to keep them alive. You dont care if they starve to death
You think if babies are starving to death it's ok to kill them? You could have a field day in Africa then.
If you saw a baby starving in the street would you give it food....or a lecture on personal responsibility
All surgery is dangerous, ask your doctor or surgeon. My husband is a surgeon. We have many friends that are anesthesiologists.
I know.. I have hired many surgeons, Cardiac, vascular, thorastic, orthopaedic etc.. but, a D & C is not a particularly dangerous procedure.
Yes , it's crap but those poor Anti-Choicers...all they have is old debunked hogwash ……...and they have to dig it up every once in awhile PROVING they have no real argument...
Your whole post is old unproven hogwash from years ago but you got one thing right ! ""They want those organs as fresh as possible."" YES, harvested organs need to be as fresh as possible...Yeah for you, ONE right even tho you make it sound like a bad thing...
Vegas giants said: ↑ Wht hasn't she reported this to the authorities? As Judge Judy would say , THAT'S not an answer..... Can't answer???
LOL Are you inadvertently trying to tell us something ???? HILARIOUS posting from you.... "If I Only Had A Brain" ...from the the Wizard of Oz....
Another hilarious post Posters lose credibility when they try to prove things using the word "probably"....it just doesn't work !
Thought the mood needed a little lightening up. Maybe they could play this one in abortion clinic operating rooms...
I wonder howbnmany pro-choice voters would choose to abort their baby past 6 weeks gestation when on seeing the ultrasound the heart was beating and then fetus was visable? Or better yet choose to abort it at 8 or9 months when it was fully formed and could survive outside the womb? Why wouldn't she with the fathers permission deliver the baby and give it up for adoption. That brings up another point, shouldn't the father have a say before an abortion can be performed? Oops, the supreme court already ruled that has no rights concerning the decision to abort, regardless if he accepts sole responsibility for the delivered child. So in my opinion, if the woman decides to have the baby, the father should have no legal responsibility for raising the child. The woman can't have it both ways. Many more men these days have strong feelings about aborting aborting a fetus.
What difference would it make? Women still have a right to abort. And, no, women are not so stupid that they don't know what pregnant means and need an ultra-sound to show them. Why would a woman do that ? Because she doesn't want to gestate and give birth. BTW, women do NOT need any man's PERMISSION to do anything with their own body.... WHY? When a man impregnates a woman that doesn't mean he owns her. HE isn't the pregnant one . Should he "have a say" if the say is ""have an abortion""? If you're referring to the father, No, it didn't. regardless if he accepts sole responsibility for the delivered child. Good reason for a woman to abort.... However, the law and taxpayers disagree with you. . What "both ways" do you want women not to have? So? THEY aren't pregnant . If they are so against abortion then they should gladly bear the responsibility of supporting the kid when it's born. YOU seem to be against that. Men can't have it both ways