This anti-abortion nonsense is simply . . . nonsense. Get this through your heads. Within the law this is the woman's choice, not yours. You have your own opinion, and that means that is only for you. It has no weight in law.
So do you, unless you support elective abortion in the 7th month of pregnancy. Look, the woman in this situation is already deciding to carry a pregnancy. It's not like the question is about whether to be pregnant or not. She just wants to terminate one of her twins. I question how much of a difference that really actually makes to her body. Yeah, the bump might be a tiny bit bigger, and there might be a tiny increase in risk. Most pregnant women who find out they have twins are elated.
There is no one else, kazenatsu, but your comments can be applied the to you, who is trying to decide issues immorally and illegally for the mother.
I'd hardly call choosing to electively abort one of your twins a complex moral issue. They usually don't even identify that twins exist until later into the pregnancy, and then they usually prefer to wait a few more weeks after that so the fetuses will be big enough that they can easily pick out one without harming the other.
Are you aware how much of a radical Pro-Choice position that is? Or do Pro-Choicers now support Elective Twin Reductions (i.e. "The Two Minus One Pregnancy" it is sometimes called)
The radical position is yours, kazenatsu. It is not your business, period, to interfere with others' choices.
kazenatsu failed to acknowledge "t is devilish to put a mother's health or life at risk to have a baby."
So what's the problem? The majority of women with twins will carry to term. But women who were high risk to start with need to have the option open to them to reduce the risk. Isn't it better to bring one healthy child to term than have a high risk of miscarriage or complications that might endanger both? When it comes to women making life or possible death decisions, it should be left to her and her doctors - not some key-banger who slept in a Holiday Inn last night and knows nothing of her medical history.
Pro-Choice ONLY means the woman has the choice. It does not mean anything else. You have been told that many, many times....why is so hard for you to get?? Do you need it explained in simpler terms? There aren't any. Is it so hard for Anti-Choicers to understand that women are humans with rights!!! ??WTF...why is that so hard to understand??
No, but God certainly can. After all, every child is a gift from God. But again, pro aborts who think THEY have the moral high ground will answer to a HIGHER authority in God Almighty.
Even the ones ripped from their parents and caged like animals and sexually abused on the border ?? There are no "pro-aborts"...there are Pro-Choicers who believe everyone, even women , should retain the right to their own bodies. Pro-Choicers do NOT insert their morals as Anti-Choicers want to do....they just want everyone to have the same rights...it is not a moral issue..
It IS a moral issue. it is about the sanctity of life. Not terminating it all because the woman wants to be a selfish self-centered bitch.
FoxHastings said: ↑ Even the ones ripped from their parents and caged like animals and sexually abused on the border ?? There are no "pro-aborts"...there are Pro-Choicers who believe everyone, even women , should retain the right to their own bodies. Pro-Choicers do NOT insert their morals as Anti-Choicers want to do....they just want everyone to have the same rights...it is not a moral issue.. No, it's not a "moral" issue...it is a legal rights issue. And your "morals" are not everyone's nor should they be and YOU have NO right to impose them on others.. YOU:"""because the woman wants to be a selfish self-centered bitch"""" The hatred and misogyny ALWAYS oozes out eventually... BTW, you forgot to address the question in blue bolded above....
You have the same right to think its wrong as she has to abort one of the twins. The solution is simple. Pass a law against thinking its wrong.