Its not your answer. Its hers. She gets to choose the venue, the time and the method to provide any reassurance needed, assuming her voters need one. You are not entitled to invent an answer, as whatever answer you think will make her look worse, just because she did not provide one to you. Neither is the Daily. What they can logically conclude, by her refusal to answer their question, is that she did not want to answer their question.
Now if I could trust you, those statements would be reassuring. I definitely do not trust you. They are not.
No, I mean that the only difference between christianity and al queada is how seriously you take your fairy tales.
1 Samuel 15 Contemporary English Version (CEV) 15 One day, Samuel told Saul: The Lord had me choose you to be king of his people, Israel. Now listen to this message from the Lord: 2 “When the Israelites were on their way out of Egypt, the nation of Amalek attacked them. I am the Lord All-Powerful, and now I am going to make Amalek pay! 3 “Go and attack the Amalekites! Destroy them and all their possessions. Don’t have any pity. Kill their men, women, children, and even their babies. Slaughter their cattle, sheep, camels, and donkeys.”
Or by Omar herself. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/a...-dual-loyalty-charge-was-anti-semitic/584314/ Is she a Nazi now?
And yet, if Trump doesn't in no uncertain terms condemn any violent acts by any radical Right wing group Lefties will say he enables or supports them. https://www.politico.eu/article/tru...sts-in-statement-on-charlottesville-violence/
I guess, the danger is that I convince the christians that the bible does tell them to kill and they will all start bombing. I suppose the good thing is that christians don't take their crap as seriously as the muslims.
I do, but are you seriously suggesting that this gives Christian individuals the license to kill non-believers?