Omar refuses to condemn stoning of gays

Omar refuses to condemn stoning of gays.

Anyone surprised? Sharia is brutal and violent.

 

Not to worry, old friend, I don't mind correcting your silliness. FDR interned Japanese citizens and aliens at the insistence of Republican governors and flag rank officers on the West Coast.

Also, all of the following is true and no one can rebut it: " Desegregation came from FDR (forcing labor unions with government contracts to hire blacks), integrating the Armed Forces in the Truman era, Brown v. Kansas and Little Rock in the Eisenhower era, the Civil Rights and Voting Acts under Johnson strongarming the GOP into support, and then Nixon."

Yes, Johnson forced the GOP to kneel before him and . . . kiss his shoes, telling them he would tell the world that the bills could not pass without their support and that he would blame them for it.

 

Republican governors? You seem to have forgotten the GOP WERE the liberals of the day.

 

Majority of Christians do accept it.

"By calling this covenant "new," he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and outdated will soon disappear."

 

Dems of those days were conservative.

 

Why do you call it nonsense. Do you even know what it is?

 

Prove this claim. My guess is that you do not actually know what "New Covenant Theology" is - never mind know what the majority of Christians denominations accept.

 

The same as any crime of violence towards another. 1 is too many. But I am not willing to make it some kind of priority or any other crime of violence unless there is strong proof pointing to a group of specific people. till then I want it handled like any other crime of violence.

 

That would be Tlaib, Omar is Minnesota's frankenstein. I do however believe that Tlaib cannot serve the Greater Detroit area due to her own bias and failure to conceive any other notion beyond "impeaching that mother ****er".

 

I'd be worried less about who started the KKK, and much more concerned with who those inbred bigots identify with today.

They sure as shiite ain't Obama voters...

 

Sure it does. And so does the koran. They also both say to kill people. Some people listen to the guidance that says to kill people, some follow the guidance that says not to kill people. Religion is based on nothing, so there is never any way to determine which one to listen to.

 

Do you know the difference between "New Covenant theology" "Covenant theology" and "Dispensationalism" - don't feel bad if you do not know this stuff off the top of your head. I have studied this in the past and still had to look it up.

I am going to address this issue by posting from some Pastor - a link from a quick google search - rather than going through this issue in detail.

https://berbc.org/Library/New Covenant Theology - A False Gospel.shtml

I post this not because I agree with everything this fellow is saying - but for context. Where I do agree is that NCT is "heresy" - and is viewed as such by the Catholic/Orthodox - and as we can see in part from this link - Protestantism. This guy is a "Reformed Baptist".

Unlike this fellow - and you can read further in the link - I am under no compulsion to back up my argument against NCT through the writings of Paul.

I refute this theology simply on the basis of the teachings of Jesus and his focus on works as a salvation formulation. The idea that the 10 commands no longer apply - as per the teachings of Jesus - is abject nonsense. No serious person - after reading the sermon on the mount "Matt 5-7" can maintain the this position.

One can maintain this position focusing only on Paul - but even those who rely only on Paul have problems - as outlined by the link provided.

Romans 2 for example has Paul saying that at the end of days we are judged on the basis of our conscience - "secret thoughts". How is this is not a reference to deeds ?

It is not for nothing that the "Majority" of Christianity - (Catholic/Orthodox) rejects "Sola Fide". Never mind Sola fide - which most Protestant denominations accept. NCT is a whole different level of pain - one which many (if not most) Protestant denominations do not accept.

 

How do you know? There is absolutely no reason to think it doesn't say to put on a suicide vest.

 

Neither is isis honestly.

 

ISIS is Islam as Muhammed made it,

The others don't like it because in true muslim fashion, they are conquering them

 

Well, christianity did a lot more conquering than islam. Maybe isis is christianity as jesus made it.

 

Not hardly.
Muhammed was a rapist, murderer, thief sexual pervert, slave trader, terrorist.
He encourages his men to be terrorist.

Jesus was none of these.

 

Christianity produced advanced nations.

Islam produced the permanent 10th century.

 

Now, Republicans are the ones working over black people.

 

Why must she respond to Brunei, when her she is so obviously so for LGBT rights than your random right wing Christian?

 

We don't know that. The bible allows all of that. The bible has and can easily be used to justify terrorism, or rape etc.

 

LOLOL

If you don't understand it the tenth time you are told.
.what makes you think you will understand it the 11th.

 

Why must specifically SHE respond to a call from an Islamophobic news site when her position on LGBT rights is so clear?

 

Not Jesus's part.

even the Jews don't follow their part anymore.

 

Fake. She isn't prepared to talk to an Islamophobic news site, while her position on LGBT rights is absolutely clear.