A few off the top of my head: Vietnam, Cambodia, Irak, Iran, Korea, Grenada, Cuba, Mexico, Syria, Ukraine, Nicaragua, Guatemala ... VENEZUELA. The definition of logic.
Huh? In that case, you've just proved yourself wrong in your first statement about being objectively correct. Duh.
It is objectively true that life ,liberty and property are paramount human rights Any person or government who disagrees is objectively wrong.
I don't try to compare it. For me it's two different problems, religious fanaticism and corruption by the industrial-financial lobbies. One doesn't excuse the another. One causes another, it's the industrial-financial lobby which organized the mass migration to lower the wages and divide an united ethnic group. Most of them are black. From my point of view, there is many ethnic group in France, "gauls" which are inhabitant of metropolitan France, carribean french which are inhabitant of french caraibs, the reunionais, the inhabitants of the island of La Reunion. So yes, french caraibean are from french ancestry even if they don't belong to the same ethnic group than "gauls". What are you refering to ? Burma ? I always said that I supported the expulsion but not the exactions going with them (slaughter, rapes).
No actually the founding fathers of our nstion made it up. That's why they wrote the constitution the way they did. Yes any government that doesn't allow for the protection of it's citizens life, liberty and property. Is a crappy government. I do not see why anyone would disagree.
As stated I am acquainted with a few Muslim women who go full covering. So you dont even have to deal with this and you're this upset about it? Whata going on in your life pal? Want to talk about it sport?
What does your constitution have to do with the rest of the world? Yours is inferior. You have had more than 30 amendments to your Constitution so "your founding fathers" were not so smart. That is why so many nations take up arms against the U.S. They value their lives, liberty and property. You really do not understand what you are saying. Your notion is:
Not according to the Independent. They believe it is an attack on Muslims women forcing them to stay in the home and say that footage showed that they were men dressed in shirt and pants and carrying backpacks. They believe this is a gift for racist vigilantes and speaks about headscarf's worn by Muslim women resulting in attacks. https://www.independent.co.uk/voice...lim-islamophobia-church-bombing-a8891656.html
Sweden huh? So how has America deprived the Swedish people of their lives, liberty or property? Enjoying all the medical procedures medications and technologies developed in America that would not exist were it not for people being free to persue their passions for profit?
The CIA murdered our Prime Minister. You are extremely misinformed about who developed what and you didn't respond to a single point I made in my post.
But I do. In the end, if La Reunion and whatever ends up not being part of France, you would demand that only the white French people can remain in France,... just like you don't want the Algerians out. I'm referring you don't like violence yet support ethnic cleansing. Not based on ethnicity,... but on religion.
In fact that's not true and the evidence is everywhere. Your beliefs can be forced through the educational system, the social system, the denial of free speech and access to outside world through books and other medis. Beliefs are being forced on these poor children, for example. https://www.theepochtimes.com/we-wi...lphia-muslim-society-say-reports_2906090.html
The ethnic cleansing of Muslims out of Europe / France... an idea that VotreAltesse supports. Do keep up if you jump in.
But I asked you what the term means because you've used it often.. What 'ethnicity' are you referring to and 'cleansing' in what way?
Is it your understanding that Islam is an ethnicity? What do you mean by 'cleansing'? How would the French do that?
According to the UN, you can ethnically cleanse a religious group. Let's stick with what the world has agreed upon. And yes, I soured that
I'm asking you, not the United Nations You're using the term on this thread, not them. Do you not understand what you're saying when you use it?