Muslim kids in Philadelphia chanting about chopping off heads. Media is SILENT!

Okay, and who are you saying would cast them under a bus?

Well I don't understand the connection between, a) the Western media's failure to report on non-West stories, and b) Muslims coming to the West to escape Islam.

 

Do you think I'm going to answer differently if you ask the question again?

Try not connecting things that aren't connected.

 

I previously asked you about "drop the gay people" not "cast them under a bus." I truly cannot understand if you are
saying that the left would preference Muslims or gays if Muslims began to attack the LGBT agenda. You seemed to be saying both.

Alright, well if they're not connected, then why DO you think that the Western media doesn't care about non-West stories, specifically terrorist attacks?

 

I don't follow.

They don't happen here.

 

Political correctness
... it does not apply to Christian or caucasian sensitivities.

 

The Sunnah is the most important of the Islamic text.
It explains the religion.
It explains Muhammed.

 

the Jews and Muslims defended Palestine together against the Crusader hordes.

should tell u something

 

If you look at a map of the Roman Empire, you will see much of the Middle East belonged to it, along with the coast of northern Africa. After the conversion of Constantine the Great, this land all
became, at least nominally, Christian. With the advent of Islam in the 600 ADs Muslims immediately began launching wars of conquest against "unbelievers," Pagan, Christian and Jews. They
conquered much of the area around Saudi Arabia, then North Africa, then invaded Spain, and then France. There they were finally halted by CHarles Martel at the Battle of Tours in 732 AD. In
the East, however, Muslims stayed on the offensive, concentrating on the crumbling Byzantine Empire (the old Eastern Roman Empire). It was the desperate pleas for help from Byzantium that
led the Pope to call for the Crusades. Most of the battles of the Crusades were fought on land which had been Christian prior to being captured by the Muslims. The Crusades were wars of re-
conquest, not conquest. After the failure of the Crusades, the Muslims finished off the Byzantine Empire, capturing Constantinople (now Istanbul), after several tries, in 1453. They then fought
to expand into Western Europe by conquering Hungry and the rest of the Balkans, and then invading Austria. Vienna was besieged in 1529 and 1683, barely holding out each time. The
Ottoman Empire continued waging aggressive wars until finally defeated by Prince Eugene of Savoy at the Battle of Zenta in 1697. By then, Western military skill and technology had finally
surpassed that of the Ottoman Empire, which for centuries had been the greatest, and most aggressive, military force on earth. Islam waged aggressive war, killing hundreds of thousands and
en-slaving hundreds of thousands more, until it was surpassed by the West's technology. Islam did not become peaceful until it could no longer fight with any hope of success. This was a brief period
compared to centuries of aggressive war. The low-tech nature of terrorism has allowed Islam to return to its tradition of violence and aggression.

 

The biblical god used Judah to fornicate with his own daughter while using an adolescent virgin to create some messiah.

 

See the Philly article. Westboro's views square with those of many (not all) on the far right.

 

And you compare this obscurity (and I have no idea what you're talking about) to the pedophile Mohammed to the modern day Ayatollah Khomeini, a Muslim figure revered by Muslims everywhere?

If you're going to be an apologist for Islam against other religions at least try comparisons which make some sense and have some connection. https://archive.org/stream/TheLittleGreenBook--AyatollahKhomeini/The+Little+Green+Book+—+Ayatollah+Khomeini_djvu.txt

 

How many and where are they? What does Pew say about this, and why your obsessions with Christians? Aren't Muslims killing them fast enough for you?

 

The fact that Islam was forced upon all people of the region, you can still see the consequences on a map today, should also tell you something. It was the Muslim hordes who did the killing in order to spread Islam, and that's going on today as well.

 

That happened only a couple times in history, also in Spain.
They needed to join forces against the good Christians.

 

I doubt anyone outside of their insane church pays any attwention to them.
and, They aren't killing anyone.

 

What I referenced is in the Bible which you obviously don't understand. Most likely you know even less about the Koran.

 

The Westboro Baptist Church has fewer than fifty members and are considered nuts by everyne, including those on the religious right. I think "Mr. Truth" was referring to the story of how
after the destruction of Sodom and Gommorrah, Lot (not Judah) got drunk and had sex with a daughter because he thought they were the only people left. This action was not in anyway
approved by God. Lot was clearly sinning. I'm not an expert on the Bible, being an agnostic, but I believe that's how the story went. This is much different from Mohammed marrying a six-
year-old girl when he was fifty (though supposedly he didn't have sex with her until she turned nine).

 

The white terrorism that exists today has been largely spurred by that hate cult and by the present regime in Washington DC.

 

Try again. See the story of Judah and his daughter Tamir. All Abrahamic Jews are descended of this incestuous union (I am one such descendant).

 

LOLOL

So you think white terrorists are Westboro babtists.

 

Actually they are not.

The story of Lot didn't happen.

 

Well I said I wasn't a Bible expert! I did just read the story of Tamir and Judath online (New International Version) and didn't see any indication that God wanted this to happen. Also Tamir was
a daughter-in-law, not a daughter.

 

daughter-in-law = you are correct - but still incestuous

 

tell that to "born again" Christians [sic] on this forum

 

babtists ??


lol